The purpose of this discussion is to define and compare political advocates and lobbyists and explain how the World Health Organization (WHO) advocates for healthcare policy. A political advocate is an individual that pleads a cause for others or a certain population to strive to achieve a larger goal for the greater good (Mason, Gardner, Outlaw, O’Grady, 2016). I like to think of advocacy as the umbrella term for recommending and/or supporting a cause. Mason, Gardner, Outlaw, O’Grady (2106) explains that lobbyists are individuals who practice a form of advocacy to represent issues of a specific group or organization with the assistance of lawmakers to influence government. Lobbyists practice advocacy, but anyone can advocate for others. The …show more content…
While lobbyists practice advocacy, advocates do not lobby, furthermore, lobbyists are paid professionals. (Mason, Gardner, Outlaw, O’Grady, 2016). Advocating for another individual is not a paid profession, although it may be part of a larger job description, such as for a registered nurse to advocate for patients. Being an advocate for one’s self, another person, or an organization can be accomplished by anyone, however being a lobbyist entails much more knowledge and effort. Lobbyists who practice and represent for 20% of their time engaging in lobbying activities must be registered through Congress, report their activities, and their purpose is to bring awareness to legislators regarding the effects that policies will have on others, or certain aspects that need to be reviewed for a change (Mason, Gardner, Outlaw, and O’Grady, 2016). While, lobbying can be practiced for business reasons on different levels, advocating can be practiced for just about anyone in a vast array of situations. For instance, Waterhouse (2013) explains that lobbying has often been related to protesting or riots, and associated with influencing policymakers for self-serving reasons, and lacks objectivity, and therefore lobbyists now must register and report their activities to congress to provide support and promote objective perceptions. In the end, advocating and lobbying hold similar principles of promoting …show more content…
The WHO practices epidemiology to establish the most prevalent health concerns across the world, they collaborate with other global and national healthcare organizations to combat these health disparities, and assists those most in need, and they advocate the most essentials needs in healthcare to promote healthcare for all (World Health Organization, 2018). Recently, the WHO launched a global advocacy campaign to promote quality women’s and girls’ healthcare initiatives and bring awareness for equity in reproductive health. The World Health Organization (2018) explains that they have held 137 inter-parliamentary union assembly which is established around advocating improvements for health and well-being to key decision makers. Lastly, they are the voice of those in need globally, in other words, they advocate for the rights, needs, and critical health concerns globally to bring awareness and make changes for the better (World health Organization,
In the article “Learning to Love our Lobbyist Friends”, Frederick Allen argues that lobbyists are an imperfect necessity to democracy. Allen argues that Americans adore the lobbyists who represent them, yet despise the ones who represent causes they oppose. Allen examines the history of lobbying, and how their transparency has changed over time. Lobbying has changed from a shady and secretive system composed of bribery and scandal to a much more open and heavily regulated system whose lobbyists are well-educated and dedicated to their causes. Although scandals and cases of bribery still do occur now, various pieces of legislation have been passed over the past century to make lobbying more transparent, with registration for a lobbyist being
The National Conference of State Legislation defines lobbying as, “a citizen’s right to speak freely, to impact
Lobbyists speak with Congressmen and women directly, some go as far as testifying at congressional hearings. They have access only to the lower levels of the executive branch,
Texas Lobbyists Lobbyists play an important role in the legislative process in Texas, as they represent the interests of various organizations and industries to influence legislation. They are professionals who work to promote or oppose legislation and policies on behalf of their clients. They use their expertise and experience to educate elected officials and policymakers on the impact of proposed laws on their client's interests. Lobbyists in Texas are required to register with the Texas Ethics Commission and file reports on their activities, including the amount of money they spend on lobbying efforts. This helps to ensure transparency in the lobbying process and prevent undue influence by special interests.
For this week’s discussion board submit I selected to discuss the lobbying systems in Congress for AARP (American organization of Retired persons). AARP is a u.S. Founded non-executive organization and interest group, its membership institution is for people who are aged 50 and over. The institution was once founded by using Helen Percy Andrus, PhD in 1958. Intently tied to congressional Democrats, AARP is the largest non-industry lobbying workforce in the United States, paying lobbyists large sums to petition Congress and federal corporations on issues of social and political import. In 2008, the businesses $27.9 million in lobbying bills have been passed simplest via those of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Exxon Mobil.
Khadka 2 Asmita Khadka Professor S. 1 Sharifian GOVT 2306-73011 4th April 2017 Lobbyists and Interest Groups in Texas “Lobbyists are salespeople hired to persuade decision-makers in the Legislature and in the agencies of the executive branch”. A group of people drawn or acting together in support of a commoninterest or to voice a common concern as defined by dictionary.com. 2 “State law requires lobbyists to report what they spend on legislators and other state officials. But the loopholes are big: Less than 5 percent of the lobby's reported spending on food and beverage names the eaters and the drinkers” (Analysis: 3 When a Disclosure is No Disclosure at All, 2015). Lobbyist are supposed to be facilitating the people whereas, it’s found that
The following analysis will expand upon one of the congressional caricatures observed in Hamilton 's article: the act of lobbying misrepresents the public 's opinion and should not be endorsed. Hamilton proposes a precisely balanced approach to lobbying. He states that lobbyists are principled people who play a large part of focussing the public 's attention on significant issues and are key to helping Congress members stay informed. He emphasizes that those who practice lobbying do so, in the open, as part of "the broader policy debate" (as cited in Stinebrickner, 2015, p. 117). As a previous member of congress, Hamilton 's opinion on the matter is soon justified and I agree with him.
Congress’s processes for reviewing and debating proposed legislation may be streamlined because, with the executive branch, the constituents, and the interest groups, it can help the process run smoothly. It should be streamlined because the executive branch aims at improving the function of the departments or agencies that Congress already has created as the constituents make telephone calls, respond to public opinion polls, and send faxes to keep in reach with their elected officials. Individuals and groups seek to influence members of Congress and legislation through lobbying, which they have to be well informed, knowledgeable, organized, and cooperative in order to convey others. The values that are served by streamlining is it helps to
Interest groups in Texas are relatively powerful actors in the political process. Organized interest groups and their representatives, also known as “the lobby” participates in the policymaking and political processes in Texas. Interest groups provide critical channels for Texans to communicate their political preferences and attempt to influence government actors and their fellow
A lobbyist is a political activist who provokes awareness on a particular issue. They can be affiliated with a larger entity or groups
1. They are important source of information. A member who is part of congress has to evolve themselves with many policy areas. But a lobbyists can confine themselves to one area and can by providing specialized expertise. If the information is powerful, then the lobbyist can be an allies. 2.
2. Trying to adopt lobbying methods based on fully understanding the restrictions and benefits that nonprofit organizations can gain through those programs • Most of the nonprofit organizations try to avoid involving into lobbying activities because they think it may hurt their current donations and it will not help them to reinforce what they are doing . It is obvious that nonprofit organizations usually do not put many efforts at lobbying; however, it actually can help them to grow, develop and get supports in a long-term.
According to Shilton’s Advocacy Model, it is important to identify the evidence sources that will support the model and ensure that it remains on course to achieving the objectives. In health care advocacy, lobbying is one of the strategies applied in supporting the sources of information for a strategy (Hansen-Turtonet et al., 2010). As a result, some of the sources of information that will apply in the strategy include the government websites that list the importance of nurse-managed health centers and why they need community support. In using the lobbying method to advocate for the support of the nurse-managed health centers, we will enforce the message to all the stakeholders and the community in
An example of this would be in 2000 whenever pharmaceutical lobbyists had the idea of pushing for medicare part D(The Atlantic). Medicare Part D is a prescription drug benefit but it bans bulk purchasing resulting in companies making a 205 billion dollar benefit(The Atlantic). This is why drug prices in america are virtually higher than in any other country resulting in you having to pay more of your hard earned money. What makes today different than the 60s is that today corporations now have the resources to play both sides of the field on almost any top priority issue. The said main reason corporations lobby is ¨to protect the company against changes in government policy¨(The Atlantic).