Kevin Yuan
Professor Ananda
PHIL 101
16 July 2023
Chapter 3 Paper
Who am I? What is the connection between our spirit and our body? What becomes of our souls after we die? These questions are important to human minds because they help people understand themselves better and develop their own meaning in life. Philosophical questions are some of the most important in people's lives, and it challenges them to reflect and meditate on life and human existence. Great Greek philosophers such as Socrates and Plato laid a solid foundation for the future of philosophy, and their contributions to the discipline have been studied for centuries. Socrates' view of soul and body set the groundwork for philosophers to observe and challenge, and many important
…show more content…
He believes that everyone has an unchangeable, eternal spirit that lives on even after their bodies die and perish. Socrates promotes dualism, the view that reality is divided into spiritual and physical realms. The spiritual realm, according to Socrates, is perfect, everlasting, immortal, and unchanging, whereas the physical realm is mortal, imperfect, and always changing. Socrates also believes that our souls pursue true wisdom and perfection. Although our souls yearn for knowledge and perfection, they are unable to reach their full potential because they are bound to imperfect and mortal human bodies. Socrates contended that our immortal souls, which reside in the ideal spiritual realm, are pulled into the physical realm by human bodies. However, Socrates claimed that reason is an effective tool that our souls could use in the physical realm to communicate with our imperfect bodies. Because our spirits and bodies come from different realms, it would be difficult for them to connect fully without reason. Socrates' concept of dualism brought in a new era in philosophy, and his achievements and contributions to philosophy will never be …show more content…
However, there are challenges to Socrates' theory of dualism from opposing positions. For example, the female philosopher Diotima provided an opposite viewpoint to Socrates, claiming that our souls could not be immortal because our bodies correspond to our souls and they are inseparable. Diotima believed that physical characteristics such as hair, skin, and blood were constantly changing. Furthermore, Diotima believed that the same changes were taking place in our souls. Not only is our physical body constantly changing, but so is our spiritual mind, as we have diverse thoughts, ideas, and emotions over time. Diotima added that, unlike the gods, humans are neither immortal nor eternal, and that everything in this world would perish eventually; thus, comparing ourselves to the gods and their unchanging, immortal features is unfair. As Socrates' concept of dualism became increasingly popular, more objections and competing beliefs were raised against him. Although Diotima's statement that mortal human beings cannot be immortal in an imperfect world strikes the core of Socrates' philosophy, it raises further questions regarding the relationship between souls and
Plato claims that the soul is immortal because of his argument of Opposites, to which I agree. Socrates says, “For all things that come to be… [come] from their opposites if they have such...” and “…those that have an opposite must…come to be from their opposite and from nowhere else.” (70e) Socrates argues the opposites of Bigness and Smallness. For something to be considered big, it must have first been smaller, and for something to be considered small, it must have come from being big.
Socrates in the dialogue Alcibiades written by Plato provides an argument as to why the self is the soul rather than the body. In this dialogue Alcibiades and Socrates get into a discussion on how to cultivate the self which they both mutually agree is the soul, and how to make the soul better by properly taking care of it. One way Socrates describes the relationship between the soul and the body is by analogy of user and instrument, the former being the entity which has the power to affect the latter. In this paper I will explain Socrates’ arguments on why the self is the soul and I will comment on what it means to cultivate it.
Throughout the Phaedo, Socrates predominantly tries to establish the immortality of the soul and persuade the sceptics of the soul’s immortality using the above arguments. The cyclical argument suggests that death and life are opposites that come from one another. In other
Unit 8 – Final Exam 1. For Socrates, the entire world was strictly defined as only a human world (Navia 160). In other words, Socrates’ level of thinking was strictly focused on only other human beings, other people just like him, that’s what Socrates’ entire philosophy was fundamentally focused on. Everything else in the world, such as different objects and animals, did not interest Socrates at all because his entire existence was essentially human, nothing else. And to be human basically means to possess the power to be conscious.
In the entry of Phaedo, Plato claims that the soul is immortal and that when the body dies the soul gets reincarnated. Throughout his story, Socrates provides arguments that help support his claim about the soul being immortal. I will be explaining and evaluating 2 of Plato’s arguments that will help him support the statement that the soul is immortal. An argument Plato uses is called the argument from opposites, which is the first argument he uses in the selection.
Which of us goes to a better thing is unclear to everyone except the God". This proves that Socrates believed in after life which is dependent on God. Although, Socrates believed that he was a messenger of God. The people blamed Socrates to have a neutral approach towards their Gods, so they decided to put the blame on him for all the misfortunes. Socrates actually believed in after death which means that he also respected the presence of supernatural
However, when faced with uncertainty, the possible outcomes that are hyper fixated on will vary from person to person. Socrates, in this situation, is quite optimistic about the afterlife, choosing to focus and imagine the most ideal scenarios, when in reality, others will imagine more daunting
In the Republic, Plato gives an argument saying the soul is immortal. In this paper I will present his argument and show that his argument is invalid. I will show why the conclusion is not true and restate the argument to make it valid to help with Socrates’ claim. Plato’s argument on why the soul is immortal: 1. Something can only be destroyed by the thing that is bad for it.
According to Socrates, the body is subject to constant change and decay, while the soul is eternal and unchanging. Therefore,
It never changes and yet causes the essential nature of things we perceive in the world. These two perceptions are what Plato describes as the divided line or the journey of self discovery. This progression of the spirit, that can never be reached, becomes the ideal. Plato’s discussions include the involvement of the soul. It is clear, that the main reason for dealing with the soul is to achieve this state
First and foremost, Socrates’ bases his argument for the cyclical generation of opposites upon an “ancient doctrine” which he assumes to be true. This doctrine asserts that the living is born from the dead, which can be traced back to Ancient Greek mythos, and for which there is no determinable evidence to support its accuracy. Socrates was no doubt aware of this, and even stated toward the beginning of his argument in the Phaedo dialogue that “if [the doctrine asserting that the living is born from the dead] is not [true], then other arguments [would] have to be adduced (28).” Another assumption made is that the soul, the Forms, and an unearthly realm exist as anything more than conceptions of the mind. Part of the Phaedo dialogue is given to describing the nature of the soul as that which is incorporeal, akin to the divine, and imperceptible in the earthly realm.
He also believes that it is not difficult to refrain from death, but it is difficult to stay away from evil since it surrounds us all. Doing something evil and sinful will torment one’s soul forever, even after death. Socrates believes
However, the number three cannot ever be even for it holds a natural form of oddity that cannot be changed, the same is found with immortality. A soul cannot admit to death, which is the opposite of its essence immortality just as the number three cannot admit to being even. Leading to Plato’s conclusion of how a soul then must have to retreat, connecting back to Socrates believing death is best characterized by the soul separating from
The Phaedo captures the final stage of Socrates’s life in Plato’s words. In it, Socrates argues for the immortality of the human soul by explaining the Cycle of Opposites and the Theory of Forms. In the specific passage to be analyzed here, Pages 23-24, lines 73e-74c, Socrates explains the Theory of Recollection and thusly begins to explain the Theory of Forms. Socrates begins this passage by asserting that a certain object might remind someone of a person, that a picture of a horse or a lyre might remind someone of a friend who rides horses and plays the lyre.
In Phaedo, Socrates asks his companions “if the soul exists before, it must, as it comes to life and birth, come from nowhere else than death and being dead, so how could it avoid existing after death since it must be born again? (77d)” In this passage it is implied that the soul is an entity which passes through a person 's life stages, remaining intact when it enters the body at birth and also when it leaves the body at death. Socrates then compares the soul to the Forms, which are “invisible” and unchanging, to distinguish it from the body, which is “visible” and subject to change (78d-79b) This comparison is meant to comfort Simmias and Cebes, who are concerned that the soul might not survive the physical body 's death. This