Analytical Review of “Is Google Making Us Stupid”
As society advances into the technological era, innovations have served society as a catalyst to become more efficient, more technologically sound, and most importantly more in tuned with the rapid changes that are presented to us every day. Yet, there are some, that like to stay “old school.” There are some arguments that state these technological advancements are receding society’s intellectual advancement. Nonetheless, it should be apparent that the subject on society’s advancement has many view points and approaches. In “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Nicholas Carr approaches the common issues of common availability of information through the internet; most importantly how it effects our ability to search and retain information. Logical appeal is heavily used, as background information and resources are mainly present to support his statement on modern access to information. His motivation for his argument is from a scene in A Space Odyssey. His main point is how the natural thinking process is slowly being replaced by
…show more content…
Throughout his opening of his essay, the reader may be convinced about his viewpoint on online resources, but not entirely. During this point of his essay, personal accounts are only being stated, instead of logical outside information to support his argument. This is presumed that this is his reason for use of hyperbole. Prior to his opening of the essay, his title states a bold statement, foreshadowing his opinions on the topic. Besides his overdramatic examples from A Space Odyssey, Carr does use some metonymy in his title. The use of Google is a metonymy for modern technology and services. This serves as an audience hook to the argument. Since Google serves as one of the leading forefront in technological advancements, it was appropriate to use Google for his
In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicolas Carr analyzes the dramatic affects that technologies have been having on our brains. The short summary, the Net is making us all mindless zombies in Carr’s mind, but he is not the only who feels that way. His long dragged out article is abundantly full of meaning examples, personal opinions, and hard facts on the drastic changes the Net has done to our brains. Carr starts his articles with the death of super computer, HAL, from the movie A Space Odyssey.
Every day new technology is advancing to makes its way into the world where it is used more efficiently. In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?,”, Nicholas Carr claims that human are no longer able to focus on longer texts due to the rise of digital texts. Nicholas Carr includes strong evidences to support his statement; and through the usage of ethos and pathos, he is able to convince his readers that “the Net is becoming a universal medium” (Carr). Examples of Ethos are evident throughout the article making Carr’s argument deductively valid. Nicholas Carr is known for his reputation as someone who has written influential pieces and earning many awards for his accomplishments.
Writer, Nicolas Carr, in his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, expresses the search engine Google is effecting the human mind. Carr’s purpose is to covey his idea that the web changes the way humans think. He creates a pessimistic tone to his audience that spending a lot of time on the internet is bad for the mind. I don’t believe Carr made an effective argument on this article because of the tone he used, the references he provided, and how the article was laid out. Carr begins his article to the readers by acknowledging the web is messing with his brain and he is not thinking the way he used to.
In Nicholas Carr's article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?,” the author argues that the Internet has become a new form of acquiring knowledge in people’s lives. Additionally, the author supports his own statement by demonstrating that within just a few clicks, one can instantly gain any information or article online without the need to visit and search a physical library. However, even though the Internet ameliorates the quality and quantity of resources to gain knowledge, he believes that as the source of knowledge is replaced by a convenient web page, society becomes easily distracted. In Clive Thompson's article, “Smarter Than You Think.
Rhetorical Analysis In the article “Is Google Making us Stupid?”, author Nicholas Carr expresses his idea that the internet is taking over society and our thinking process. Google is affecting our abilities to read books, longer articles, and even older writings. Carr believes that we have become so accustomed to the ways of the internet, and we are relying on Google 's ability to sort through the details for us so we don 't have to, in order to get the information we find necessary more efficiently. He finds that this process has become almost too handy, and that it is corrupting us from becoming better educated.
Being that Carr titled his work, "Is Google Making Us Stupid?", why does he think that it is only Googles fault? Technology is growing every single day and we are the ones creating it and changing the way we do things. Carr claims that his "concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages... deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle"(735). I agree that this happens to a lot of people, it even happened to me reading his article.
He talks about the study report that people go online to avoid reading in the traditional sense. For example, one of the study reports, “It is clear … traditional sense (349) proves people, who use the internet, never return to any source they’ve visited. They just take the information and quickly jump to another source. He tries to give his audiences, mostly everyone who uses the internet about his argument by providing what we are losing over time in the process of using internet as our main information source. One more thing, Carr says that Google has made everything easier for people to take in
Macy Sadler Mrs. Woodward APEL: Period 4 5 February 2017 Quality Non-Fiction and the Internet How often do you log on, scroll through, post, or “like” something on the internet and is that time used on the Web interfering with your cognitive abilities? Do credibility and sentence style make Nicholas Carr’s article a reliable source to reference and believe? Carr’s article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, is full of irony, persona, and concrete examples all to help the reader understand or even change their outlook on the internet and how it affects our daily lives. Nicholas Carr is an American non-fiction writer who was a finalist for the 2011 Pulitzer Prize, and was awarded the Neil Postman Award for Career Achievement in Public Intellectual
For my analysis essay, I will be analyzing the effectiveness of the rhetorical devices in Nicholas Carr ’s essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”. Carr, a writer who primarily focuses on technology and business, makes a bold claim that the ability to simply search for answers to our issues is weakening our problem solving skills. As the saying goes: if you do not use it, you lose it. Although he admits that the advantages of having unlimited knowledge at our fingertips is invaluable, he also claims that humans tend to misuse the Internet- as soon as anything requires true thought, they go to search engines which think for them.
Is Google Making Us Stupid was written by technology and culture expert Nicholas Carr, whose works have been translated into more than 25 languages. Is Google Making Us Stupid? falls under the informative and technological education categories. Carr is educating his audience on the key ideas and supporting data from research and studies. This essay examines how we use technology, with a special emphasis on how the internet has altered how we read.
Nicholas Carr in his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” explains that humans are being programed to process information like a machine, which is making us lose the ability to think for ourselves and losing our humanity. He uses a lot of bias sources in his writing about the “programing” that google is doing; which leads me to disagree with his assessment of google and what it is doing to us. My synopsis of his article is that google, or technology, is not making us programed to take in information at face value and losing our humanity because we are relying on it; but rather, google and technology is letting us embrace our humanity through our creation of technology by letting our individual thoughts be enhanced by giving us access to other
In his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid? ” , Nicholas Carr talks about how the internet has affected the way most people process the information that they could found online. The title of the article is the most obvious clue for the argument that he is trying to make. He also points out how internet is our primary source to find the information that we are looking for, but the side effect is affecting our basic ability to read long pieces of information such as books. Google is a well-known website that allows to anyone instant access to kind of information, which can be really helpful if the user knows how to use and manipulate it.
Rhetorical Analysis of Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid? We are at a time where technology is widespread; it has become a part of our everyday life leading to advantages and disadvantages. Technology nowadays has become the most important topic to discuss and everyone has developed their own unique opinion. In Nicholas Carr’s article published in 2008, “Is Google Making Us Stupid” he argues that as technology progresses people’s mentality changes.
Brainless.com: Rhetorical Strategies in Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Do we depend on the Internet to answer all of our questions? Nicholas Carr, an American author, wrote “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” published in 2008 in The Atlantic, and he argues about the effects of the Internet on literacy, cognition, and culture. Carr begins his argument with the ending scene of Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey.
He supports this argument by citing a study conducted by students who have attended The University College London. The study proved to us that we no longer thoroughly read material, rather we just skim over most of what we read. From the convoluted works of the late 19th century, to the material of present day, the way we write and comprehend