In the article, “LSU Professor Fired for Profanity and Sex Jokes, Sparking Free Speech Outcry,” the author Riley Griffin writes to illustrate a unique but uncomfortable situation involving former Louisiana State University professor Teresa Buchanan: A tenured professor at LSU since 2002 - and an elementary education professor prior to her termination - Teresa Buchanan found herself at the unemployment line after an internal investigation by the LSU board of supervisor, in respond to complaints registered by students about Buchanan’s profanity and impropriate comments during class, found Teresa Buchanan guilty of using the F word during class to incite the attention of students; and guilty of making obscene jokes in reference to how active consensual sex activities between husband and wife will decline overtime during the life span of the marriage. The board also concluded that Teresa Buchanan have committed sexual harassment, an act that created a hostile environment …show more content…
Instead, my notion is both parties have accused each other of wrong doing because they disagreed on what constitutes free speech and harassment and offensive and academic freedom. Think about it. Does free speech grant teachers the right to talk about sex in a classroom that focuses on teach current students on how to educate our youths? If yes, or no, what is free speech? Is it sexual harassment, or even harassment, if comments made in reference to sex are not directed toward any particular student? Even if the comments are not directed toward any particular student, is it still punishable under school policy and government policy? If yes, or no, what are these policies? In addition, can a professor be punished if an individual student found the comment to be offensive, disturbing? If yes, then is there such a thing as academic freedom? If there is such a thing as academic freedom, what is it? What are the limitations to academic
In the story “Should This Student Have Been Expelled?” by Nat Hentoff was a very good argumentative passage. Hentoff argues that freedom of speech should be valued no matter how offensive it is interpreted by others. Dough Hann abused his freedom of speech when he blurted out “Fuck you niggers” to black students at Brown University. A student asked Hann to stop screaming and Hann yelled “What are you a faggot?” Next, Hann noticed an Israeli flag in the student’s dorm and asked “What are you a Jew?” and shouted, “Fucking Jew!”
No, matter where you are in the world, distractions are going to get to you, and it affects your primary focus and mission. Distractions keep you from doing your work and keep your mind drifting elsewhere with little side bars in your head. According to source one “Brain Interrupted” By Bob Sullivan and source two “The Censors” by Luisa Valenzuela, both are connected with hindrance among the effect technologies has on the human Brain and Juan retrieving his letter. So, with both Brain Interrupted and The Censors both sources prove that distraction can affect your train of thought or what you are doing in general, with Bob Sullivan he displays his point through technology and the effect it has on you, while Luisa Valenzuela profess her point through her fictional character Juan and how he got bewildered.
The Los Angeles County police sent a letter to over two-hundred parents of current and former students. The letter suggested that there was a possibility that their kids might have been molested. In a matter of days, parents all over the county began accusing the Mc Martin staff of rape and other charges. The letter which included a filled-out form had words like “oral sex”, “fondling of genitals”, and “sodomy”. These terms soon turned parents into a troop of angry citizens that demanded justice and answers to their accusations.
The “Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition” case was argued on October 30, 2001 by the Attorney General Ashcroft. It was a case to decide if the Child Pornography Protection Act of 1996 (CPPA) was constitutional or not (Ashcroft v. The Free Speech Coalition). The CPPA prohibits “any visual depiction including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer-generated image or picture” that “is, or appears to be, a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct,” and any sexually explicit image that is “advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that convey the impression” it depicts “a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct” (Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition). “It took place at the United States Supreme Court
Today’s college students are becoming more sensitized to the harshness of the outside world. Instead of learning to be resilient to others’ comments, they are being taught to take offense to any little word that could in some way be connected with a bad experience they might have had, and college administrators and professors are aiding this childish behavior. They are backing this movement to make adults into children. With this new movement to rid college campuses of any speech that may make anyone feel uncomfortable, students are being treated less like adults, and more like elementary children.
Christopher McCall Laura Retersdorf English 1102 10/12/16 Annotated Bibliography Buchhandler-Raphael, Michal. " Overcriminalizing Speech. " Cardozo Law Review 36.5 (2015): 1667-1737.
PART TWO For Part Two of this assignment, I chose prompt #9, “Newsworthy” (3-5 pages) “Riots” A utopia is an imagined community or society that possesses highly desirable or nearly perfect qualities. In Lois Lowry’s 1993 John Newbery Medal winning novel, “The Giver,” the citizens feel no pain, they have no feelings. A dystopia is a utopia where things have gone wrong. If the Bible is to be believed, the “Garden of Eden” was our utopia.
The novel The Handmaid’s Tale, by Margaret Atwood should be kept as an instructional option within high school English classrooms. The novel creates exposure to students in an environment where they can ask questions and become more educated rather than being oblivious to the subjects taught in the book. This argument will be backed by an interview with Emma Watson and Margaret Atwood and quotes from The Handmaid’s tale by Margaret Atwood Firstly, a quote from Offred in the book The Handmaid’s Tale. This example will demonstrate that the novel spreads good messages that are often not acknowledged by those wanting to ban the book.
The players have freedom of speech but the 1st Amendment has limitations. They are allowed to talk anything and about anyone to a certain extent. However, they cannot take it for granted and abuse the freedom of speech as they please. Twitter is part of public domain. The rules of the country take precedence over everything else in the public domain.
Every year individuals from all across the United States makes the decision on whether or not they will try out for an interscholastic athletic team. These individuals hope to be part of something special, whether it’s achieving individual goals or team goals. They also understand they will need to sacrifice time, energy, and their social life in order to achieve these goals. When tryouts begin these individuals hope their skills and abilities will get them recognized by not only the coaches, but the returning players as well. A problem arises though once try outs are over and the team is announced.
She wishes to withhold this information from students merely to protect the painful feelings evoked from reading such disputed topics. Censorship is an incredibly
This essay is about a Pennsylvania high school teacher, Natalie Munroe, who posted offensive, but anonymous, things about her students on her blog. The things she wrote about her students online were perceived to be inappropriate by the students’ parents and surrounding faculty. Munroe was suspended without pay for her anonymous actions. What this essay is attempting to defend is the teachers’ right to freely and anonymously vent
People have the tendency to take the First Amendment for granted, but some tend to use it to their favor. Stanley Fish presents his main argument about how people misuse this amendment for all their conflicts involving from racial issues to current political affairs in his article, Free-Speech Follies. His article involves those who misinterpret the First Amendment as their own works or constantly use it as an excuse to express their attitudes and desires about a certain subject matter. He expresses his personal opinions against those who consistently use the First Amendment as a weapon to defend themselves from harm of criticism.
The class and Mrs. Saunders ignore the comment rather than addressing it and punishing the commenter who clearly hurt
I am undecided for Freedom of Speech. There are plenty of good and bad qualities, and as much as there are pros there are also an equal amount of cons to freedom of speech. According to the first amendment, we the people have the freedom of speech which allows us the right to speak freely without censorship. Freedom of speech is not absolute in any country and the right is commonly subject to limitations, such as on “hate speech”. There are many pros and cons to freedom of speech, which is why I am only discussing three pros and cons, that I find that argues the opposite side, to the point it made me undecided on free speech.