This is the case of a 64-year-old Winnipeg man named, Miloslav Kapsik. The crime occurred on March 21, 2010 at 12:04 am. Miloslav and his wife, Ludmila Kapsik, 59, were in middle of watching a hockey game, where he suddenly got up, walked to the storage room and grabbed a hammer and started beating his wife. Before he calmly called the police to confess what he had just committed, he cleaned the blood off his hands and face, changed his clothes and sat on the couch for nearly an hour and then called 911 to report “I hurt my wife, send the police”. He beat his wife a minimum of fifty seven hammer strikes to her skull, and a total of one hundred blunt force trauma wounds all over her body. Forensic evidence also indicates the victim suffered defensive injuries to her forearms, hands and elbows. The couple had been married for 36 years and had no history of reported domestic abuse. Miloslav Kapsik’s defense lawyers say that he be held not criminally responsible for the killing of his wife. I think that Kapsik should be charged with second-degree murder because he knew the difference between …show more content…
Although it seems out of the ordinary that a perfectly loving husband had any reason to kill his wife in the middle of watching a hockey game, he did say that he knew the difference between right and wrong. He can only get off on NCR if he didn’t know the difference. In an article by The Police Insider, “Kapsik indicated the voices he heard didn’t tell him to do anything, they only made it difficult for him to think. He also admitted he hit his wife many times, but had never hit her in the past. His most import admission was he knew that hitting her was wrong.” I agree with the jury in that he committed second degree murder because unlike criminals with schizophrenia, Kapsik had a clear sense of what was right and wrong and that “the voices” didn’t tell him to kill his
The victim was threw in the river. The victim’s husband return home from an overnight trip to discover his wife missing and home a mess. The same day the husband discovered his wife missing her body was found by some fishermen. Christopher Simmons’s was going around town boasting and bragging about how he killed the victim and robbed her. Simmons’s was later arrested where he attended high school.
In the news a couple of weeks ago, a man was arrested for brutally attacking the mother of his child over a custody dispute. The attacker, Michael Roberson, 45 years old, was charged with first degree murder and aggravated assault because during the attack, Roberson stabbed the victim multiple times and he digged both of the victim’s eyes out of her socket which reportedly happened in front of the child and a neighbor who tried to break up the fight between the attacker and the victim. By the time the victim got to the hospital, there was no way to save her eyes so she has permanently lost her eyesight. According, to the new source, Roberson has a history of assault, however, those charges were dropped by the judge who found Roberson insane
On July 8, 1981, three men forced entry into a home in Tampa, Florida. The five occupants of the home were threatened and then robbed by one of the assailants that possessed a shotgun. Afterwards, two of the female victims, ages 38 and 12, were forced into the trunk of the car, driven to a nearby wooded area, and raped by two of the assailants while the third remained inside the vehicle. Left tied to trees, they were able to untie themselves and contact the police, similarly to those victims left inside the recently burglarized house. Luckily, the license plate number of the vehicle being driven was able to be identified in an attempted pursuit.
Have you ever committed a crime? Trevor, a troubled young man certainly did. Trevor is from a small town in B.C. He lived in a group home. He also had a few run-ins with the police for a couple of years.
Carson Hays Mrs.Dixon Criminal justice III 23 october 2017 Richard Kuklinski Throughout this year we have studied many different types of serial killers, but under no circumstance is Richard Kuklinski like any other serial killer we have studied. Richard Kuklinski was a stone cold killer and nothing would stop him from completing his objective of murdering his target. Serial killers that we have studied had many different categories that they fell under disorganized, organized, power control, etc… But with Richard you never knew the certain way he was going to kill his victims. Like most of the serial killers we’ve studied they have had a troubled upbringing and so did Richard kuklinski.
The battle between Alberta and Osceola, leaders of their tribes, was to take place in the swamp. The leaders were seeking claim to the land. Alberta was intelligent, self- motivated and hardworking. Osceola was presumptuous to say the least. The tribe led by Osceola had plans to defeat Alberta and her tribe, but Alberta establishes a plan to demolish them.
The article says that in court the woman admitted that she had been planning to kill her children for two weeks, but she also planned to kill her husband along with them, but
The excellent sample of deliberate homicide includes a spouse who gets back home startlingly to discover his wife conferring infidelity. In the event that seeing the issue incites the spouse into such warmth of energy, to the
Introduction: ‘But you know- I’ve been through a trauma life- but you know, life goes on.’ (Bourgois, 2003, p221) Throughout this essay I will explore the character of Candy in the light of a victim, a criminal and a respected character. I believe Candy is an excellent representation of gender in El Barrio which Bourgois has shown us in his book ‘In Search of Respect.’
However, they found a head wound. To begin with I think that Queenie is guilty because she went home ten minutes before her friends got there which is enough time to kill her husband so she would have witnesses to make it look like it was an accident. As a rule when people kill someone and have
I ask you what is self defense when the man she murdered laided defenseless and unconscious on his bed? The defendant is only claiming that she acted in self defense to get away with the cold-blooded murder of the man she claimed to love. The defense during this case tried to convince you that Mrs. Stephens was a helpless abused wife. Let me ask you, is Mrs. Stephens helpless when she was able fire a gun and put three bullet holes in her husband? And how is she helpless when she was given many opportunities to escape from her husband for her safety and her children’s safety?
Glady’s Heavenfire Case Battered Woman Syndrome has provided women who have been abused at the hands of their partners recognition in the criminal justice system and is allowing women to tell their stories. Although there are controversies surrounding battered woman syndrome, it should not be viewed as an excuse for killing their partners. It is a real disorder that has affected thousands of women 's lives all over the world. Discussing the Gladys Heavenfire case will bring awareness to the life of a woman who has been abused by her partner for several years. Furthermore, it provides information on Indigenous women who are more likely to suffer abuse than white women.
The facts of this case start with a woman in her home in Detroit on September 2nd in 1982, who was playing with her 7 month old son when a man broke into her house. He dragged the woman to an upstairs bedroom and raped her on the bed. He then allowed her to put a robe on and led her down stairs and stole $60 dollars from her purse, her wedding band, and $100 more from the house. After the man left this woman called the police and they arrived then they collected the robe she wore and the sheets from the bed. She was then taken to the hospital for a rape kit to be collected.
For Dena Schlosser, the issue of insanity was less clear. In Schlosser’s first trial, the jury ended up deadlocked as to whether or not Schlosser was legally insane under the Texas insanity defense law. Similarly, in the second trial, the defense and prosecution let the judge decide the verdict, which was not guilty by reason of insanity, and it was revealed that Schlosser had a brain tumor, which could have led to her religious delusions telling her to cut off her baby’s arms, fatally injuring the daughter (New York Times). In the simpler case of Deanna Laney, Laney suffered religious delusions that led her to crush her sons’ skull with rocks, and the expert witness, Park Dietz, said, “Laney didn’t realize her actions were wrong, which means she was legally insane under Texas Law” (NBC). All five psychiatric experts in the trial said Laney qualified as insane under the Texas due to a “severe mental illness [that] caused Laney to have psychotic delusions that rendered her incapable of knowing right from wrong during the killings” (USA TODAY).
In the case of Judy Norman should have been acquitted based on self-defense rather than being convicted of voluntary manslaughter. According to defense psychologist, Judy had been tortured, degraded, and reduced to an animal level of existence. Since her husband had abused her for twenty years physically assaulting her, burning her with cigarettes, forcing her into prostitution, and forcing her to eat dog food off the floor. Judy’s first resort was not to kill her husband, first, she contacted police after a horrible beating, but was so deep in a cycle of fear she did not press charges on her husband. For police officers to be first responders to domestic violence calls they should be trained to know the signs of domestic abuse, and the cycle