Case Study-The Financial Crisis
Author Name
University Name
Case Study-The Financial Crisis
➢ Background
This case study highlights the conflicts between the government and the banking sector. It discusses the disputes regarding the need to tighten up the rule and regulations of banking sector and the need to stay with the bonus driven structure.
The UK Government is considering adopting a regulation reform that will be based on directing banks to separate their retail banking from other businesses they are involved in. It also involves an increase in the capital required to be kept in the bank to combat any future fluctuations. All the stakeholders are not in favor of the reforms. Most of them believe that these structural reforms
…show more content…
It states that an action is morally justified only if the intention of that act is morally right without any reference to the after effects. The various aspects of mortgage market have to be placed within the Kantian perspective to be able to understand the reasons for subprime crisis according to the Kantian view. Maxim of mortgage market can be stated as anyone can borrow subprime mortgage credits whenever he requires money for financing.
• Any maxim cannot be morally acknowledged unless it is universalizable. The above stated maxim drastically alters the first categorical imperative that an act is morally acceptable only if the maxim associated with it is universal. In other words, if all the people start lending even if they already know that they will not possibly be able to return the amount, this indicates that the maxim is actually not universal.
• As far as the UK banks are concerned, they also broke the second categorical imperative that every client should be considered not just as a source but an end. However the UK banks utilized the mortgage lenders as a mere source after deregulation to gain greater
…show more content…
Therefore the immoral acts of mortgage lenders indeed are responsible for mortgage crisis.
1.4 What clashes of rights are involved in this situation? Is it possible to judge their relative importance? Whose rights matter most in this situation?
• The clash of rights is between the mortgage lender and the mortgage borrower. The main aspects of subprime mortgage crisis involved low credit quality loans given at decreased interest rates and were scrutinized. They were sold to the investors who were interested in investing in this sector.
Some of the rights involved in the case study are mentioned below:
• The banks have the right to accessibility of their retail operation so that they can finance their investment operation.
• The small businesses have right to get loans with an optimum or bearable interest rate.
• The government has a right to induce policies to restrict the risky role of banks in order to protect the money of the tax
These “bank runs” caused even more banks to close down, and by the end of the decade, around 9,000 banks had to close down. The surviving ones became skeptical of loans and were not willing
If there was ever a word to describe the events that led up to the financial crisis of ’08, “Moral Hazard” would fit the bill perfectly. Moral hazard happens in financial terms when the success of a particular transaction is very heavily dependent on the performance of a particular party’s obligations, but where a particular party has no interest or incentive to carry out that obligation diligently. Let’s for instance take the example of a loan worth $720K, which was given to a strawberry picker earning around$14K/year to acquire a certain piece of property in the early 2000’s . In this case moral hazard was there and existed because the loan company intended to sell the loan forward to the credit rating agencies due to the inability of the
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was the federal government’s reaction to the financial crisis of 2008. The Dodd-Frank act symbolized the government’s regulatory stamp on the banks in the United States . This regulation from the Dodd-Frank Act set the goal to lower dependency on the bank federally by setting up regulations and tampering with companies that are deemed “Too Big to Fail”. Before the enactment of the Dodd Frank act, it took many obstacles to produce the content provided which sparked from the issue at hand with the financial downward spiral and the decisions as well as actions from overseers such as: the Secretary of the Treasury Hank Paulson and the presiding president George Bush. Two men emerged
The Stock market crash of 1929 was one of the first reasons why the Great Depression began. The stock market crash lasted ten days where the value of stocks quickly dropped as investors sold off their stock in droves. Because the negative components from the Great Depression, President Franklin Roosevelt felt it was his job to cure America’s Great Depression. A small group of intelligent minds from leading American Universities, known as the Brain Trust, were hired by Roosevelt to come up with strategies to deal with the Great Depression crisis.
What happened to all the banks then? Well first off people had complete trust in them, that is until the stock market crashed. Banks had invested a lot of money in the stock market also. But when it crashed they lost it all and
Beginning with bank reform, the New Dealers were able to maintain oversight in the banking industry, which had previously been an unregulated and unpredictable source of capital. The Glass-Steagal Act and the Emergency Banking Act signaled a shift from a lassiez faire approach to the banking industry to one that ensured banks were making responsible loans and not gambling with depositor’s savings in the stock market. By not allowing banks who were considered “irresponsible’ to reopen and separating the savings and investment functions of the banks, a more secure system began to emerge. The impact of this legislation was immediate, as bank failures dropped dramatically. Additionally, major breakdowns in the banking industry were avoided until fairly recently, which came as a result of the repeal of Glass-Steagal.
Mohammad Haneef & Erosion of Civil Liberties Weland La ‘Australia’s laws are severely eroding civil liberties.’ Discuss this statement in light of the Haneef Case and one other issue (such as the right to silence, privacy, etc.), commenting on the extent to which the law balances the rights of the individual with the needs for community safety. In correlation with the Haneef Case, Australia’s laws are severely eroding civil liberties as demonstrated by NSW’s introduction of the Evidence Amendment (Evidence of Silence) Act 2013.
There were 10,000 banks that went out of business. Around one-half of all banks either closed or merged with other banks. The role of the Federal Reserve and government increased. Tighter regulations were put on financial markets and banks. The Federal Reserved shifted to a policy of maintaining high employment and fast growth.
Amidst the troubles of the Great Depression, rumors of bank corruption and closure provoked investors to pull their money out of American banks. Of course, the banks could not keep up, and fueling even more panic and withdrawals. To curb this vicious cycle, president Franklin Delano Roosevelt established an indeterminate bank closure, a “holiday” to allow the banking crisis to stabilize. However, for the plan to work, he needed the support of the American public. And so, in his first “fireside chat,” as journalists would later dub it, Roosevelt reassured the public and informed them of his plan to repair the banking situation.
In 2007, a crisis broke out due to big disruptions in the wholesale bank-lending market. Around 2008, the Fed made two programs that
John Locke Born on August 29, 1632, in Wrington, Somerset, England, John Locke is known as one of the most famous philosophers of the 17th century. He is often regarded as one of the greatest contributors to political theory, and was very influential in the areas of religious toleration, theology, and educational theory. Born to a legal clerk with a military background as a captain of the Parliamentarian side during the English Civil War of the 1640’s, John Locke was raised as a Puritan, an English reformed protestant aiming to purify the Church of England from all Roman Catholic Practices. As a teenager, Locke was admitted to the Westminster School of London, where he received an excellent education.
In Addition to maldistribution stood the credit structure of the economy, some farmers were in deep land mortgage debt, so they lowered their crop prices in order to regain credit, and because the farmers were no longer accountable for what they owed banks. Across the nation the banking system found themselves in constant trouble. In America both small and large bankers were concerned for their survival, so they began investing recklessly in stock markets and granting unwise loans. These unconscious decisions would lead a large consequence, such as families losing their life savings and their deposits became uninsured. “ More than 9,000 American banks either went bankrupt or closed their doors to avoid bankruptcy between 1930 and 1933.”Although
The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the study of International Relations, the book for which E.H. Carr is perhaps most remembered was written just prior to the outbreak of World War Two (WWII). This particular work of Carr’s is primarily a study of the fundamentals of International Relations, which is exemplified especially by the events of the two decades before 1939, the year the book was published. In the Twenty Years Crisis, E.H. Carr explores the interplay of the worldview between Utopians and Realists. Carr’s work examines why the League of Nations and the peace as implemented by the Treaty of Versailles failed, ultimately resulting in WWII.
A risky investment if the homeowners were unable to repay the mortgage. This proved to be the case when the US economy and housing market crashed in 2008 and Lehman Brothers had billions of dollars invested in the subprime mortgage market and homeowners had no money to repay the
financial crisis is not a strange thing nowadays. It has been expanding and getting bigger on the geographical side and it reached the largest from 1929 to 1933. The world economy has from time to time been hit by crisis situations, and nowadays crisis is most presumably not the last one. Be that as it may, a few elements joined to make this one the most serious crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s, including macroeconomic issues, disappointments in budgetary markets and weakness is obvious in applying the policies.