There were many bitter controversies revealed when the Alien and Sedition Acts were passed in 1798. The rise of xenophobic fears was not only found in the general public but in the heart of the lawmakers.These acts show how xenophobic fears were on a rise, however howe these expansion were not constitutional, and the excesses power given to the federal government.
The Alien Act are examples of how in America, xenophobia, or the fear or distrust of people from other countries, was on the rise. This fear was rooted in Americans’ hearts due to events like the XYZ affair or even the revolution itself. Many Americans feared that other countries would take advantage of theirs well it was still in development stages, and what better target than
…show more content…
As humans it is hard for us to put aside biases. Alexander Addison said, “ the exercise of those faculties of opinion… must be limited, so that it never… represents a solemn truth or exercise of religion as false or ridiculous,” (Doc. 3) Personal biases can easily creep into law, as Addison said, when the government has too power. The xenophobia reflected in the Alien and Sedition Acts shows how personal biases can affect the whole nation. The government has too much power as there is no one to stop it from making these decisions. Representatives are supposed to represent the people and their interests, and that includes foreigners, yet they make acts against them. The federal government possessed too much power as it could make acts as it wished, not worrying about the consequences. Benjamin Franklin Banche said, “In Turkey, the voice of government is law, and there it is called despotism. Here the voice of government is likewise the law and here it is called liberty,” (Doc. 5). Another way the biases were shown was in the political cartoon (Doc.4) which shows Jefferson attempting to the destroy the constitution. The cartoon is expressing the fear that the federal government will gain too much power and overthrow the constitution, and as a result, giving the federal government much more power. The federal government possessed too much power and the American people were starting to notice, represented by the American eagle fighting Jefferson, attempting to stop him. The American people recognized that federal government possessed too much power, too much voice, and did not remember the basic freedoms which all men have, choosing instead to ignore them, allowing their personal biases to take
During his time as president, Adams had decided to sign the Alien and Sedition Acts. The Alien acts was an act that had said that they could deport foreigners and make it harder for them to be able to vote in any election. Sedition Acts had said that if people were to write hateful against the government or president then it is considered as a
X-Marks Native Signatures of Assent written by Scott Richards Lyons explores the history of the American Indians in the United States. Further, Lyons goes into depth about boarding schools, assimilation, treaties, broken promises, and tragic events that caused harm to millions of American Indians. In this paper, I will discuss how the White Europeans came to the United States and basically assimilated the tribes that were located here before the “discovery” of the Americas. Next, I will define the terms treaty and x-marks. Lastly, I will explain how unjust everything is, in particular when we talk about the rights, and properties that tribes had before the Europeans came to contact them.
Did the Alien Sedition act violate the constitution Did the alien sedition act violate the constitution, there is a lot of debate on this subject because people look at things from a different point of view and when they hear someone say something They don’t agree with it's they argue and debate on the subject. I believe the alien and sedition act was not going against the constitution because the immigrants came here illegally, they could have come legally if they just.signed some papers and took a little more time out of there lives but if they did need help maybe we should let them in so they could get money for their family. The act was wrong but I don’t think it should have happened they shouldn’t have put them in prison or sent them
Amanda Martin Mr. Gubellini Humanities I Honors February 15th, 2015 Manifest Destiny In the 1800’s the United States did not only torture and remove the Native Americans from their homelands, they also decided to come up with an excuse called “manifest destiny” to make their expansion westward and taking some of Mexico’s land seem like it was acceptable. Surely enough it did not come without a price. We would have never achieved manifest destiny if it wasn’t for the Texas Revolution, the Annexation of Texas, the Mexican-American War, the Bear Flag Revolt, and conflicts with that Native Americans.
Causes, issues, and groups involved The conflict with the aboriginal people of Canada is seen to have begun with the official Indian Act of 1875. However for decades prior to the Indian Act the population of Canada had been aiming to get the indigenous population to assimilate to the new, more modern European settler lifestyle and cultural ideals. Prior to the Indian Act, there was the Gradual Citizens act which was passed in 1857. These laws and acts became the basis of the modern Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Canada.
In the novel Prohibition: Thirteen Years that changed America, author Edward Behr thoroughly explained the Prohibition movement through different people’s points of view. He first starts with George Remus, a famous bootlegger and his wife Imogene’s story of the consequences of overconsumption of alcohol during the Prohibition time period. He gives the reader into the insight of George Remus’s trial for the murder of his wife and how Remus played the courts by claiming that he was mentally ill during the act of murder. The courts believed this accusation and ruled Remus not guilty of his wife, Imogene’s murder. He was however sent to a sanitarium for being mentality ill.
The powers explicitly stated in that document are the only powers the federal government can have. Should the influence of the national government be expanded to control the entire peoples of the
As government began to gain more power and authority they began to start violating the citizens very own rights in order to gain more power. The Alien and Sedition act explained that no one can criticize the government which completely go against the 1st amendment of the bill of rights of free speech and press. This violation goes back to the John Peter Zenger’s trial during the colonial period, where the British violated the colonists rights. The citizens,intended audiences, is shocked by this because, after they have separated from the oppressing British, they are once again having their rights being violated. This led the citizens to believe that the federal government have too much power.
Britain and European roots drive in the U.S having an economic interest over freedom. Layers of self-interest are threaded and lays as unnecessary compromises for the rights and liberties given to the excluded. Their self-interest could not be achieved without disrupting a correct and unbiased, balanced government from the beginning. This needs to keep the rich and the poor divided the country and the start of rebellions. These rebellions were merchants fighting the injustices.
Washington Post). The U.S Supreme Court took this “anti-religious bias” as
In Federalist Paper number one Alexander Hamilton states, “History will teach us…” He conveys what he is trying to say using words like despotism, emolument, obsequious, and demagogues. In an excerpt Hamilton says, “...their interest can never be separated; and that a dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the forbidden appearance of zeal for the firmness and efficiency of government.” In other words some of the people supporting the constitution are only doing it because they think it will increase their economical and political status and that it is hard to separate those people from the ones who actually believe in the constitution. It’s hard to separate them because they
People would consider the Alien and Sedition Acts unconstitutional because it was against of some articles from The Bill of Rights. First of all, on article 5 says that nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, and it is against the Alien Act, that says that the president have the power to deport any alien he considered dangerous to the nation's security. Second, the Sedition Act is totally against the Bill of Rights, because it placed heavy fines and even prison terms on any person found guilty of "combining and conspiring to oppose the execution of the laws, or publishing false, scandalous, or malicious writings against the President. Finally, does the President of the United States has the power to put someone
Congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts to prepare for war with France. There was an increase in required residency for American citizenship to five to fourteen years, it was required for aliens to state their intention five years before citizenship is granted, and rendered people from enemy nations ineligible for naturalization. The Sedition Act banned the publishing of writings that were offensive to the government. The acts were conceived to limit the power of Republicans by the Federalists. But when Thomas Jefferson was elected president enforcement ended of the acts.
During this period, Americans believed in what was eventually called "Manifest Destiny." The idea that it was the destiny of American citizens to settle and annex all the land in its territories between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. This led to the settlement of lands previously protected under treaties. The outright breaking of treaties, and the forced relocation of trials. Several 'plans wars ' were also fought by the U.S. military.
The Constitution—the foundation of the American government—has been quintessential for the lives of the American people for over 200 years. Without this document America today would not have basic human rights, such as those stated in the Bill of Rights, which includes freedom of speech and religion. To some, the Constitution was an embodiment of the American Revolution, yet others believe that it was a betrayal of the Revolution. I personally believe that the Constitution did betray the Revolution because it did not live up to the ideals of the Revolution, and the views of the Anti-Federalists most closely embodied the “Spirit of ‘76.” During the midst of the American Revolution, authors and politicians of important documents, pamphlets, and slogans spread the basis for Revolutionary ideals and defined what is known as the “Spirit of ‘76”.