Laszlo 12 of the respective states. So this is one factor that cannot be changed. The issue of slavery would still become a problem for both the North and South. Then, what about the decisions and accords made with regard to slavery and either its extension or prohibition in specific states? We mentioned the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which basically created a fair play situation by diving the states equally, 11 states each. We cannot claim that this was a bad decision for if one had gotten even one state more, the other would have had a reason to go to war. The other decision that took place, and which had a direct effect on the outcome of events in the period, was the Missouri Compromise of 1820 that once again preserved the balance …show more content…
We cannot say that this decision was bad or unfair for both camps either. 1830 was the year when a Protective Tariff was enacted that wanted to protect Northern products by making British products high in price. Once it was enacted, it became a number one sectional issue for the South. They had financial interest with Britain and threatened to leave the Union. This was resolved by gradually decreasing this Tariff every year until well into the 1840s, but it created a situation that had been remembered for years to come and might have contributed to the secession in 1861. The Hartford Convention took a similar threatening turn when a set of constitutional amendments were added in order to limit and take away government rights from the Southern states. This also had its mark on later political decisions finally culminating in a total war. The Compromise of 1850, which meant the admission of California for the Union and a fugitive state law for the South, was also an acceptable and fair sacrifice on behalf of the Southern states. This claimed that it is the natural obligation of every …show more content…
Those who did not comply could also be imprisoned for either hiding or helping them in their attempt escape from their masters. The list of such decisions and their consequences could further be analyzed in an attempt to find that specific point in time where we could say that once that decision or event had been changed, the Civil War could have been avoided. The problem is that there is no such point. Every decision was a reaction to needs and new circumstances that further answered to the collective idea of fair play. The problem is that the closer you get to the event, the more inevitable it becomes. Therefore, the question is not if the Civil War was inevitable, but at what point did it become inevitable? Once we find that point, it might be easier to see through the possible course of events. It is also a serious undertake since no-one can predict anything for sure. Thus, this speculation is just another way of fiddling with the idea without any hard evidence or outcome from dealing with the question. What is more important to ask: what would have happened to America if the Civil War did not happen? This question is easier to answer for the answers can be found in the positive things and series of events that have happened ever since Fort Sumter. It is essential to mention that if the Civil War did not happen, a lot of different things would have turned out differently. Slavery would have definitely died out by the 19th or early
He decided that the two states would be decided upon popular sovereignty. However, popular sovereignty did not work well in Kansas. There were many issues of violence because no one could agree on slavery in the new state. As new states came into the Union, many questions came along with it. To prevent these issues, compromises were made, like the Compromise of 1850.
Riyana Patel 12/6/15 Mr. Riotto US 1 H Chapter 7 Summary The chapter starts of with a detailed description of events before a series of protests from 1786-1787 known as Shay’s Rebellion, led by Daniel Shay in Western Massachusetts. This rebellion was to overthrow the state government by going against the Springfield arsenal; this movement was an example of the weakened government and led to the ratification and adoption of the United States Constitution. With the end of the royal authority the Continental Congress became the national government and formed state governments that were governed by the people. Although by the end of 1777 Articles of Confederation were proposed by John Dickinson, in order to help keep
The Impact of the Northwest Ordinance The impact of the Northwest Ordinance was significant. It established the way that the United States would expand west. The document helped set guidelines as to how a territory would be divided into states and then enter into the Union. Thomas Jefferson played a large part in the idea of the ordinance.
To please the South, slavery would be prohibited forever from Louisiana Purchase territories n orth of 36° 30'. Southern extremists opposed any limit on the extension of slavery, but settled for now. Missouri and Maine were to enter statehood simultaneously to preserve sectional equality in the Senate. For almost a generation this Compromise seemed to settle the conflict between the North and South. But in 1848 the Union acquired a huge piece of territory from Mexico.
The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.
In 1787, Rutledge stated that “the true question is whether the Southern States will or will not be changed to confederate otherwise… the Southern States will not be confederate at all”. This quote shows that the issue of slavery was a significant factor in the formation of the Constitution and that the authors were willing to compromise on the principle of equality to form a cohesive union. It is important to note that the Constitution did not explicitly mention slavery, but it did include clauses that protected the institution. The Three-Fifths Compromise, for example, counted each slaved person as the three-fifths of a person to determine representation in Congress. This compromise gave Southern states more representation in Congress, which allowed them to maintain a balance of power and protect their interests, including the continuation of
By this time, the Fugitive Slave Law was already in full effect, along with the Compromise of 1850. The Compromise of 1850 arose after Southerners and Northerners argued whether California and the California Territory should have slaves of not. Southerners wanted slaves in California and that territory, while Northerners did not. Created by Henry Clay, the Compromise of 1850 said that California was to be free of slavery and the California Territory had popular sovereignty. That meant that the people occupying these territories could vote and decide if slavery should be there or
Many northerners were worried about states entering. The compromise in 1820 by Henry Clay allowed Missouri a slave state, while Maine would become a free state. Also a line
{Jason Wilson} The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 was an important stepping stone for the United States after winning the American Revolution in 1783. This Ordinance created rules and regulations for the continued expansion of the United States of America set up by the Articles of Confederation Congress. The “Northwest” refers to what is known today as; Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin and a small part of Minnesota. This gave the federal government a source of revenue that was badly needed in light of the Articles of Confederation. These territories were given the standards to which they would become states and gain representation in the federal government.
The Civil War was not inevitable. Many solvable problems occurred that led up to the Civil War. Some people were too selfish, others were inconsiderate to African Americans, and others were both. With good leadership and wise American citizens, they could have prevented the Civil War. Slavery should never have existed from the beginning of time.
The Civil War, a war between the North and Southern states in the United States Union, could not have been avoided. For almost a hundred years the United States has given themselves freedom from England and has created their own government from scratch, but one thing that has never been resolved throughout the United States’ history so far is the issue of slavery. There have been many actions throughout American History that led to the Civil War, a few of these may have contributed more though. On October 2, 1800 a future slavery activist was born, this child was Nat Turner.
The significance of the Compromise of 1850 lies on the continuation of peace accomplished by the Missouri Compromise of 1820, in spite of sectional contrasts. Opinions from the north and south were opposite, but the Compromise of 1850 made them achieve an interim political harmony. It fulfilled what it planned to accomplish at the time, to revive the Union and peace. Most politicians realized that the compromise was an interwoven and that it was an interim arrangement, best case scenario to delay the unavoidable Civil War.
After the efforts to gain independence from Britain and the creation of the United States of America, eighty years later this union was not so united. When the Civil War broke out in 1861, it was the first time that Americans fought Americans. Among many reasons, the Civil War is known to be a result of the arguments over the delineation of the States’ Rights or the presidential election of Abraham Lincoln. In actuality, the Civil War, the most deadly war in American history, was due to disputes over slavery in the American territories. Therefore, the Civil War was inevitable because of the consequences that occurred one being slavery.
There were many important Compromises between the years of 1820 and 1860, some that worked completely and some that didn’t. In the early nineteenth century, people were good at compromising and making things work for everyone. How long did perfect compromising actually last? Slavery began to split the nation apart, causing compromising to become hard to do.
Two fundamental questions normally surround the history of any war: whether the war was inevitable and if it was necessary. These same questions emerge any time during debates regarding the American Civil war. The most cited cause of the Civil war is the secession of certain southern states that formed the Confederate States of America in January 1861. Thomas Bonner writes "Civil War Historians and the "Needless War" Doctrine" arguing that Southern Carolina seceded in 1860, followed by six other states by January the following year. A deep analysis of the events leading to the war indicates that the Union and the Confederates had profound ideological, economic, political, and social differences.