In this case I am the attorney for Walt Disney Studios and we have filed a lawsuit against Professor Faden for copyright infringement. This is because when he made his video he used our content without our permission and used an excessive amount. It is not fair for him to use our content because it cost us millions to make and produce those movies and he is using it for free. Also it took us a lot of time and effort to create the characters and the story behind each character. Editing and writing is a timely consuming thing which is even more money we have put into our content that Professor Faden is using for free. In the four factors that a judge considers he or she considers the amount of content used. …show more content…
Professor Faden is the wrong we have proved multiple times. It is just like the case of Rogers VS. Koons. In that case photographer Art Rodgers took a photo of a couple and he owns the copyright for it. And artist Jeff Koons made an exact replica of the image into statues. The artist Jeff Koons is in the wrong because it isn’t his image to use and he was using the statues to grow in the art world. Also the artist Jeff Koons made several of the statues and sold them for a huge profit without once asking permission or giving credit to Art rodgers. The case ended in koons having to pay a settlement to artist Art Rodgers. This case also relates to the case of Cariou vs. Prince. In that case a picture was taken by Patrick Cariou and artist Richard Prince used the exact photo for his artwork and just added a few things to it. That is exactly what Professor Faden has done in this situation and it is copyright infringement. In the case Cariou vs. Prince there was not enough significant change so it was copyright infringement so how is this case any different from
A myriad of works of literature and media use the rewriting moves Joseph Harris speaks about in his book Rewriting: How to Do Things with Texts without being aware of it. Back in October 2009, Justin Roiland had schemed to “troll” a big studio in order to get cease and desist letters with the video originally intended to be named “Back to the Future: The New Official Universal Studios Cartoon Featuring the New Doc Brown and Marty McFly” (Roiland). Justin Roiland explains how The Real Animated Adventures of Doc and Mharti came to be, “I began editing the radio play and
This video teaches you about copyrights and wrongs. The video also teaches you how to use copyright and what it really means. Faden uses clips of other people 's work to demonstrate to the viewers that it 's not copyright
In the classroom this is known (in certain situations) as cheating or sometimes just collaboration, but in works of literature it is known as copyright infringement
Throughout this semester as a class we have gone over many different terminology, seen many artists from all different countries and time periods. We have also learned about different kinds of art and media that the Artist work with. Over the entire semester I have gained a greater appreciation and understanding for art. Taking all of the new information that I learned this semester I choose three pieces of artwork from the St. Louis Art Museum. Two are similar to each other and the other is very different.
He was surprised to find out that there are many occasions where “One artist was simply replicating the work of another.” (Gladwell 235) Many artists simply change the baseline of their song and then they call it their own. Artists get their inspiration simply by viewing or listening to another artist’s work. In the beginning of the essay, he leads us to believe that plagiarism is a problem.
When an artist creates a work of art, the “reproduction of the work can only be authorized by the artist unless permission is given to otherwise do so.” (CARFAC,
This trial is on Walt Disney Studios vs. Faden on the work Professor faden made to inform people on copyright, fair use and infringement. They are battling over copyright and fair use on this video. Walt Disney Studios claims that Faden’s work is copyrighted and is suing for infringement. But Professor Faden claims that he followed all the rules on copyright and he thinks it is fair use. “ Defendence you make take your stands,”The judge says in an assertive voice.
Although the author could be protected under fair use because he was using the copy for school and it did not substantially affect the value of the work. However, if one person downloads the movie, then we know there are probably many more doing the same therefore the downloading becomes bigger than just borrowing. In the argument, the author states that he does not see what he was doing as stealing, although he states his other options for renting the movie through a reliable and authorized site. He also claims to have deleted the movie shortly after watching and doing his assignment on the movie downloaded. Deleting the file did not make the illegal downloading of the file ok.
In the book Old School by Tobias Wolff, the unnamed narrator struggles through healthy imitation and plagiarism inside of the Hill school. While attending this school, the narrator enters a writing contest. The submission the narrator uses is of another person, but he claims the writing to be so related to him and how the writing is his life in a sense. The narrator ends up plagiarizing the piece and is expelled by the school. The school expelled him with thought of reputation and to set an example for the other students.
In this highly competitive world, money is one of the most significant factors for people to survive because people use money to satisfy their desires such as clothes, food, and medicines. A company will gain profit from the amount of money that people used, but only profit cannot make company to be sustainable. Hence, every corporation should be concerned about the triple bottom lines which can lead company to be sustainable. The Triple Bottom line or TBL was created by the founder of British consultancy called sustainability, John Elkington since 1994 (economist, 2009). The triple bottom line is separately in three categories, including profit, planet, and people.
Rogers vs Koons The Photographer Art Rogers shot a photograph of a couple holding a line of puppies in a row and sold it. The well-known artist Jeff Koons in the process of creating an exhibit on the banality of everyday items, ran across Rodgers’ photograph and used it to create a set of statues based on the image. Koons sold several of these structures, making a significant profit. Upon discovering the copy, Rodgers sued Koons for copyright.
In art, it is very common to compare two bodies of work. One example of the comparison of art is the Statue of David by Michelangelo and Donatello. In my paper, I will be comparing the Kroisos and the Kritios Boy. Both of these bodies of work are statues made around the same time period, 480 and 530 BCE. As any normal comparison, both pieces have similarities that are shared and differences that make them unique.
Market Structure - Oligopoly Oligopoly is a market structure whereby a few number of firms owns a lion’s share in the market. This market structure is similar to monopoly, except that instead of one firm, two or more firms have control in the market. In an oligopoly, there are no upper limits to the number of firms, but the number must be nadir enough that the operations of one firm remarkably influence and affects the others (Investopedia, 2003). The Walt Disney Company is categorized under an oligopoly market structure.
This absence of total ownership begs the question: what is art theft? It 's clear that art can be stolen, books can be copied verbatim and other people 's work can be plagiarized. However, it is important to remember that there is a great deal of difference between mechanically copying something and developing a previous idea. In Lethem 's paper, he describes how an artist had used one of his earlier books and created a sculpture of a gun containing the original script. "I couldn 't take offense at that.
It is vacuous to think that my statue should be taken down when there are an abundance of contentious statues that still stand ground today. For example, Jefferson Davis has ten statues that still stand in America. Jefferson Davis was an American politician who fulfilled the position of president for the Confederate States. He was