All is Not Fair in Love of War The novel Slaughterhouse Five by Kurt Vonnegut questions how war is perceived by mankind. Vonnegut in his first chapter describes the process of him deciding to use his experience of the Dresden Firebombing in World War II to be the main point of his dark satire. World War Two is one of many bloody conflicts and is certainly not going to be the last. It is ironic that there are so many regulations to the chaotic phenomenon of war because it is trying to give humanity to the destruction of human life. War is a time where we can justify the taking of another person’s everything. Vonnegut displays that humanity forgets the true nature of war by glorifying it as heroic, romanticising the thrill of battle, and …show more content…
Many grow up playing war or watching shows displaying how easy war is for the protagonist giving the impression that war is a game. What Billy Pilgrim the main character sees in Dresden is gruesome and ruins the thrill of war. The character Pilgrim describes that “There were hundreds of corpse mines operating by and by. They didn 't smell bad at first, were wax museums. But then the bodies rotted and liquefied, and the stink was like mustard gas and roses”(pg.94). Pilgrim’s description is spine chilling because people are turned into meaningless heaps of their former humanity and must be disposed off like rocks in a mine. The soldiers who are on the ground or in the air at Dresden are forever scarred by the stench of burned flesh. Vonnegut constantly uses the phrase “mustard gas and roses” to describe the smell of war. The roses are the romantic views of war and the mustard gas is the deadly side. He repeats this phrase in order to describe how most war atrocities have the same smell of the soldiers’ hopes for war, but over time the stench of death will be all that is left after a day or two. Each soldier sees that their fight is the most important fight, but really in the eyes of time war is redundant. Vonnegut crushes the idea that every soldier 's’ actions will last the course of time by using the phrase “So it goes”(pgs.36,58,61). The phrase is used almost one hundred times in order to give the impression that most of war does not contribute anything new or helpful to humanity. Soldiers grow up with dreams that they will go on marvellous adventures or slay the wicked in order to be remembered, yet this is true for some not all. The Glory and romance of war are searched out by many, but many will be forgotten or die
The book All Quiet on the Western Front by Erich Remarque portrayed war as a great hole of death and despair dug by a nation's higher power for the citizens to patriotically march into. All Quiet on the Western Front was written as a 'new-age' war story; The book focused on the horrors of war rather than the romantic veneer other previous writers had plastered on. The War obliterated the distinction between civilian and military targets. 'Armies were no longer targeting just their opponents, but the civilian towns that supply them too, killing innocent people. People still today, who are innocent civilians, are being killed for being on the wrong side.
War is a very different creature when looked at from the standpoint of a soldier. Often this isn’t realized by soldiers entering battle. Paul Bäumer and Lt. Hans von Witzland were among these soldiers who had traveled to war only to find it wasn’t what propaganda and the Führer had made it out to be. In this state of disarray the laws of war were lost and replaced with savagery. In order to survive soldiers had to put away these ideas of fair fighting and fair treatment of the enemy.
For centuries, in countless countries, war has been romanticized. This means, "If you romanticize war you 're making it sound like a glorious, beautiful thing. To romanticize is to interpret things that are not glamorous in a glamorous way" ("Romanticize" par. 2). The effects of romanticized wars are seen throughout Slaughterhouse Five and All Quiet on the Western Front. The false visions of war that soldiers blindly go into mentally destroy them little by little.
War carries important morals that heighten the perspective of men and women on their nation, but it also entails many acts and experiences that leave lasting effects on their emotional and physical state. Throughout the following texts, Paul Baumer, the dead soldiers, and Kiowa’s comrades all sustain losses that compel them to persevere and fight harder. All Quiet on the Western Front, Poetry of the Lost Generation, and an excerpt from In the Field all connect to the recurring theme, horrors of war, that soldiers face everyday on the front line through the continuous battle. War involves gruesome battles, many of which lead to death, but these events forever affect the soldier’s mind and body. In All Quiet on the Western Front, men experience horrific sights, or horrors of war, through the depiction of the terrain, death, and the
The surprising variations of the seriousness and light-heatedness allow Vonnegut to show effectively that war is absurd. The most important historical plot strand of Slaughterhouse-Five is Billy Pilgrim’s war experience which occurs during the last six months of World War II. This plot strand follows Billy through the battle of the Bulge and his presence as a POW during the bombing of Dresden, Germany. Vonnegut contrasts these documented milestones with incredible amounts of dramatic irony and dark humour.
As Billy Pilgrim is walking out onto the city streets after the destruction of Dresden. In the book Slaughterhouse Five though, the description of the destruction of dresden was when billy pilgrim was watching a movie about the bombing but in rewind, “The formation flew backwards over a German city that was in flames. The bombers opened their bomb bay doors, exerted a miraculous magnetism which shrunk the fires, gathered them into cylindrical steel containers , and lifted the containers into the bellies of the planes” (Vonnegut, 74). With the little image that we get from Kurt Vonnegut’s book we can already see how dangerous and how much destruction that we see with the battle that was in dresden, but I can not imagine how much blood that was poured into the streets from this fire and bomb shells everywhere.
(Vonnegut 2). Having forgotten one of the most important parts of his life, it hints at how pointless war is and how something as big as Dresden can be forgotten as time goes on. Billy Pilgrim
So, the message Kurt Vonnegut is showing the reader, is that a society should not glorify war. Thus saying that the killing of innocent civilians is more important than, going to war and not gaining anything. To conclude, Kurt vonnegut uses the theme of war in Slaughterhouse five to show how war has been glorified by the society in which Billy lived in. The glorification of war then led into the bloodshed of many innocent live.
Slaughterhouse-Five describes the death and destruction of the Dresden bombings not as a necessary war tactic (although mentioned as such later in the book), but a horrifying event that affected too many innocent people. Slaughterhouse-Five acts as a different point of view on the war, not just highlighting the glory of it all. By illustrating the Dresden bombings in such a personal manner, Vonnegut lays down an underlying warning against
War is nasty; war is fun. War is thrilling; war is drudgery. War makes you a man; war makes you dead." (pg. 80). The effect of war on each soldier who fought in it was different and unique, and as a result, each soldier's experience with war has a different effect.
“…and without victory.” Featuring ceaseless battles and senseless slaughter, Nineteen Eighty-Four and the Hunger Games trilogy are works inspired by, and defined by, warfare. In Nineteen Eighty-Four, Orwell introduces a world in which “war is peace,” the fight is never-ending, and the enemy is ever- changing. “Winston,” the novel reads, “could not definitely remember a time when his country had not been at war...” In Oceania, war is woven into the fabric of everyday life to control the populace and ensure patriotism to the Party. As a result, the government is both omnipresent and omnipotent.
She made him feel embarrassed and ungrateful and weak because she had gone through so much trouble to give him life, and to keep that life going, and Billy didn’t really like life at all” (Vonnegut, 102). After the war, he was not seeing life as something he was interested in pursuing. Living through any type of violence can change a character for the worst. Billy Pilgrim has witnessed the firebombing of Dresden, which was worse than Hiroshima. Vonnegut utilizes this experience of Billy’s to prove how such an act of violence can alter a person’s
Vonnegut’s struggle to write an antiwar novel was actually a struggle to find a suitable perspective to represent an experience that goes beyond human comprehension. Vonnegut in Slaughterhouse-Five narrates and shaped his own life in the similar way he later narrates the life of his main character with reference to Tralfamadorian’s time theory that everything is laid before us to see at the same time. In first chapter, Vonnegut introduces us with his difficulties and struggles he had to remember what had happened and find the right words to illustrate what he had seen during the war. He mentions that he thought the book would be easy to write—all he would have to do is to simply report what he had seen. But this does not work.
War doesn't see their many personalities nor the distinct traits they each have. War only sees soldiers, pawns in its endless game. Casualties and fatalities are just viewed as inconveniences. There is little or no compassion as men are left to die drowning in a pool of their own blood. The fallen soldier is tossed away like the broken toy of a child.
Introduction They say that history is written by winners, whereas World War II is the best example of how history is shaped to favor its winners. Vonnegut in Slaughterhouse-Five unfolded the other side of war that history usually neglects. Most of us had a chance to learn about WWII in our history classes, from John Wayne movies or from historical books. Whereas what distinguishes Slaughterhouse-Five from what we used to read about war its Vonnegut’s representation of real experiences that he had actually lived while he was a soldier, prisoner and survivor of WWII.