Was The Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq Essay

1322 Words6 Pages

Imagine your entire city going up in flames faster than you can blink. Houses, stores, and schools were all reduced to nothing but ashes. Almost everyone that you used to know is now dead, in no more than an instant. This is what it would have been like to live in Hiroshima on the dark day of August 6, 1945, when the United States released the first nuclear weapon in the history of all warfare. They would drop a second over Nagasaki a mere three days later. The atomic bombs had been developed by the U.S. over the course of World War II under the Manhattan Project. President Harry Truman then decided to use them on Japan in a desperate attempt to end the war. Despite the fact that it saved American lives, the dropping of the atomic bombs on …show more content…

This is detailed in Document 3. “But this deliberate premeditated destruction was our least abhorrent alternative” (Doc 3). Although it did save American lives, the atomic bomb was not the least abhorrent alternative. It has already been shown that it was not necessary to end the war because Japan was nearing surrender. The mass destruction caused by these bombs was like nothing before and can hardly be described as anything other than abhorrent. Women and children were killed, and entire cities were erased from existence. This clear lack of respect and ethical reasoning highlights that there were more negatives than benefits of the bombs. Document 8 says, “The record of General Macarthur’s operations from 1 March 1944 through 1 May 1945 shows 13,742 US killed compared to 310,165 Japanese killed.” These numbers support the fact that the number of Japanese casualties far exceeded that of America. The decision to drop the atomic bomb added to this total, and made the comparison between American and Japanese deaths even more striking. Therefore, this so-called “least abhorrent alternative” only ensured the deaths of more than 100,000 more innocent

Open Document