ipl-logo

What's The Matter With Creationism By Pollitt

1008 Words5 Pages

Rhetorical Angliss Katha Pollitt (Original) “What’s the Matter with Creationism?” by Katha Pollitt, was written in response to a recent Gallup poll that showed 46 percent of respondents are creationists. Pollitt then proceeds to compare this poll to another poll conducted with college graduates that shows 46 percent of graduate students are also creationist as well. She then proceeds to blame the educational system for not teaching evolution to students correctly, she says: “Needless to say, this remarkable demonstration of educational failure attracts little attention from those who call for improving our schools”. Throughout her essay, she bashes the educational system and multiple religious groups for not convincing their students and children the undeniable truth of evolution. In this essay Pollitt uses insults as a way of supporting her arguments. There are also a few instances in her argument where she doesn’t seem to understand what a creationist stance is. You can’t argue against a group that you’re not educated on because there are no true facts to support …show more content…

The essay had an interesting topic and potential, however Pollitt obviously didn’t express her thoughts in a way where she could reach her target audience. If Pollitt had learned more about the position of a creationist and had built arguments against the evidence creationist base their beliefs off it would have stood a better chance at being a correctly effective essay. Pollitt also could have chosen another form of Pathos to engage her writers. She could have coaxed a feeling of sadness to make the audience feel they’ve been deprived from certain facts about evolution through education and should fight to have those extensive lectures in schools. This would have been a more effective form of Pathos rather than making people feel stupid for their

Show More
Related

  • Thank You For Arguing By Jay Heinrichs

    324 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thank You for Arguing, written by Jay Heinrichs is a novel written for the purpose of understanding, and employing rhetoric in one’s writing, speeches, and everyday life. Heinrich introduces different types of rhetoric used to persuade people, Heinrich cites examples of these to further explain his the different types of rhetoric. Throughout the introduction and first part Heinrich analyzes different types of rhetorical arguments, and further explains them by providing real life examples, Jay heinrichs establishes the importance of rhetoric in the introduction of Thank You for Arguing by exposing its rich history. heinrichs then goes on to explain how vital rhetoric is in everyday life by giving examples stemming from his own life. The uses

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Edwards Vs Aguillard

    1445 Words  | 6 Pages

    §§ 17:286.1-17:286.7 (West 1982), is facially invalid [p581] as violative of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. ”(Edwards v. Aguillard) The ruling helped many people by deciding several things at the same time. It helped solidify that the States cannot pass a law requiring the teaching of creationism or other religious text that the main purpose is to restrict the teachings of evolution. It also helped by using the lemon test, which wasn’t decided too long before this case, become a more accepted as a way to determine if a law was unconstitutional.

    Read More

  • Christian Apologic False Claim

    476 Words  | 2 Pages

    I am amazed that Christians still use the worn-out " Irreducible complexity " argument which has been proven to be untenable and false every time they are brought up. This article is no different than the " flagellum Motor, " an organism seemed to be so complex it could not function if it were changed in anyway or if its " fine tuning " was off. Then came real science which had proven that you could remove part of the motor and it still functioned in one way or another and POOF!!!! another Christian apologetic false claim gone. It should be noted that this article is from the " Institute For Creation Research " which as the name implies is a Christian apologetic agenda driven organization which means nothing they say is credible or at

    Read More

  • Allison Grimes Rigged Rhetorical Strategies

    1552 Words  | 7 Pages

    There is no doubting when it comes to rhetoric that a strong emotional appeal by a credible influential figure is an incredibly effective rhetorical strategy. This is gloriously exemplified in Allison Grimes’ article, "'' Rigged' rhetoric wrong, destructive", wherein Mrs. Grimes asserts that Trumps questioning of the legitimacy of the current election cycle is dangerous, however, her usage of emotional appeal and appeal to authority underscores her failure to include logical appeal. Allison begins her article firmly, by stating "It's time to tell it like it is."

    Read More

  • How Did William Jennings Gould Influence The Development Of American Government

    1551 Words  | 7 Pages

    He believed that Bryan’s last fight against evolution was inconsistent with everything he had previously done in his career. Gould believed that his arguments were inconsistent and blatantly wrong in certain aspects. He explains that Bryan “first made the common mistake of confusing the fact of evolution with the Darwinian explanation of mechanism”, then he “misinterpreted natural selection as a martial theory of survival by battle and destruction of enemies” and finally, “he made the logical error of arguing that Darwinism implied the moral virtuousness of such deathly struggle” (Gould). His previous doubts, combined with these errors in thought, initiated his fight against evolution being taught in schools. Although Gould thinks he got certain aspects confused, he also believes Bryan got some right.

    Read More

  • Scopes Monkey Trail Research Paper

    741 Words  | 3 Pages

    When I first read about the Scopes Monkey Trail I wasn’t sure what side I wanted to choose. While both sides made great points I agree more with the school teacher John Scopes and his attorney Clarence Darrow. If I was a juror I would not vote to convict John Scopes. Often Christian parents try to shield their children from anything they feel is unchristian like. These children aren’t going to live in Dayton, Tennessee their whole lives, when they go off to college or move away from home there are going to be people whether it’s a professor, spouse, coworker or friend that will teach them about evolution and other subjects the parents my feel are unchristian like so why not prepare them for their future and teach them these things now?

    Read More

  • Charlotte Geaghan-Breiner's Argument

    333 Words  | 2 Pages

    What makes Charlotte Geaghan- Breiner’s essay an academic argument is the evidence proven from research to back up her argument. She uses this argument to put sense into an audience of anyone who has children and give them information on how nature can be the solution to many problems. The type of argument Geaghan-

    Read More

  • How Did The Scopes Monkey Trial Affect Society

    1660 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Scopes “Monkey Trial” changed the way science and evolution are taught in America’s school systems today. The trial came about when John Scopes, an algebra and science teacher, taught evolution as a plausible theory while filling in for a biology teacher at Rhea County Central High School in Dayton, Tennessee. The action went against Tennessee’s “Butler Act,” which prohibited teachers in public schools to “teach any theory that denies the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that man descended from a lower order of animals.” Scopes, along with others in the community, wanted to change the law so that students could be taught Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, and the matter was taken to court. The

    Read More

  • Creationism In The Mid-1800s

    155 Words  | 1 Pages

    Considering that creationism had been ingrained into virtually every facet of English culture and society for the last one thousand years going back all the way into the dark ages of Europe, it wasn 't easy for naturalist theories to prevail. The Renaissance during the 1400 's and 1500 's certainly threw a wrench into the status-quo but it wasn 't until the Darwinian Evolution during the mid-1800s that these evolutionary beliefs became widely accepted. Early scientists and thinkers like Georges Cuvier, Comte De Buffon, and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck built the foundation of evolutionary principles that Charles Darwin would later capitalize on in his research. After the publication of his famous book On the Origin of Species, a backlash, especially

    Read More

  • Jeremy Maitin-Shepard Transhumanism

    631 Words  | 3 Pages

    Debate on What Transhumanism is Doing to The World Between Two “Scientists”? Credibility is a very important thing to have when writing an article or anything in general. If you don’t make your reader feel comfortable or make them believe what they are reading then they won’t stick with your opinion. That is what Jeremy Maitin-Shepard did, not only did he cite his references at the end, he quoted important scientists. Unlike online vlogs or Wikipedia which are places where anybody can go edit on their own terms without the story being published by a real publication house.

    Read More

  • Fear During The Scopes Trial

    929 Words  | 4 Pages

    Darrow creates a lasting mental impression and invokes fear through his use of graphic imagery and word repetition. The transition from guilt to fear drills deeper into their emotions . During the Scopes Trial, where a man was condemned for teaching evolution, Darrow defends science over religion, as he states that: If today you can take...evolution and make it a crime to teach it in the public school, tomorrow you can make it a crime to teach it in the private schools, and the next year you can make it a crime to teach it to the hustings or in the church. Soon you may set Catholic against Protestant and Protestant against Protestant… (“Attorney for the Damned”187).

    Read More

  • Letter To Albert Einstein Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    613 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1936, Phyllis Wright, a sixth-grader that hoped to understand what scientist prayed about, sent a letter to Albert Einstein, who responded to her inquiry with a well-thought-out letter. Within the reply, Einstein used appeals to logos, ethos, and pathos; clever manipulation of the relationship between subject, speaker, and audience; and a well-articulated purpose, all of which made Einstein’s reply rhetorically effective. Perhaps the most important observation that can be made about rhetoric in Einstein’s response is the clear imbalance of the rhetorical triangle, which describes the relationship between subject, audience, and speaker. The subject addressed within Einstein’s letter was prayer and how scientists use it, and this subject clearly

    Read More

  • Scopes Trial Dbq

    599 Words  | 3 Pages

    Urban vs Rural Scopes Trial The 1920’s can be characterized as a clash between the traditional and the modern. One of the biggest moments where urban vs rural was tested was in the scopes trial or “monkey trial”. The scopes trial involved a substitute teacher, John Scopes, who was accused of violating the Butler Act, which had made it unlawful to teach evolution in any state-funded school in Tennessee. This is where urban vs rural had huge conflict, this teacher who was considered modern for teaching his theory of humanity to a traditionalist school.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Sinners In The Hands Of An Angry God

    873 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis "Fear is an instructor of great sagacity and the herald of all resolutions. "- Ralph Waldo Emerson. “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” was a sermon written and delivered by American reverend Jonathan Edwards in 1741, and was an outstanding example of the potentially dominant convincing powers of the use of Rhetoric. The sermon, even when read silently, is effective in projecting a specific interpretation of the wrathful nature of God and the sinful nature of man.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Abusing Science By Philip Kitcher

    576 Words  | 3 Pages

    Philip Kitcher in “Abusing science: The case against creationism” argues about how creationists have motives in which they want to show that the theory of evolution are just lies. They will pick on every theory they find and claim them as untestable. The author states that creationist use tautology objection, which means that whatever the evolution theory is it cannot be tested and is classified as not real science. The author hen states that creationist do not thoroughly understand what their objections borrowed from evolutionist really mean. All they do is get whatever information makes sense to them and turn it around to a point in which will justify their point of view against evolutionist.

    Read More

More about What's The Matter With Creationism By Pollitt

Open Document