Whistle-blowing Introduction Whistle-blowing is the act taken by an employee or former employee of disclosing what he believes to be unethical or illegal behaviour taken by his employer. There are two ways in which a person can disclose information. It can be done by internal whistle-blowing or external whistle-blowing. Internal whistle-blowing would be considered when an employee discloses unethical or illegal behaviour to higher management while external whistle-blowing would be when the information was disclosed to the public. The duty to be a whistle-blower over rides the duty that you have to your client or employer. The failure to report unethical or dangerous behaviour of an employer can result in the revoking of your licence, even if it does not result in serious injury or loss of life. (Bouville, 2007) What is whistle-blowing? …show more content…
He is known for his part in leaking top secret NSA documents leading to revelations about the US surveillance on phone and internet communications. Snowden is now seeking asylum in Russia. He does not have the documents with him anymore as he has handed them over to First Look Media set up by Glenn Greenwald. The US government believe that the documents will never be returned to the NSA which leaves them to wonder what will be the next story to be revealed as not even the government can get access to the documents. Snowden actually tried to leave digital breadcrumbs when taking the documents so that the government would see what documents he looked at and what ones he copied and stole. He did this so that the government would see that his intentions were to whistle-blow and that the government could prepare for the revelations. Snowden says “I figured they would have a hard time” “I didn’t think they would be completely in capable”. He is talking about the agency missing the clues he left for them so that they could prepare for the future
To no one’s surprise there were individuals that did not believe that he was the person behind the leaks. Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein confirmed it all. They confirmed that he was the person who gave them the information that was taken from the FBI and that he was the person that they would communicate with if they ever ran into something that was worth mentioning or where close to getting the case
His purpose was to let the detractors know Snowden’s exact motive. Because the government constantly looks over ones’ shoulder, they have to constantly be mindful of their online activity and their online footprint. The Constitution was founded upon the principles of freedom from fear of the government, but this is not the case today. Edward Snowden’s views are reciprocated by the general US population. According to the Pew Research Center, 81% of people find it unacceptable for the US to monitor citizens of their countries, 73% finds it unacceptable to monitor leaders of their country, 62% finds it unacceptable to monitor American citizens, and 64% finds it acceptable to monitor terrorist suspects (Document 5).
A prime example of whistleblowing is the case of Corcoran State Prison. In 1990’s the Corcoran State Prison in California was home to some of the most dangerous and infamous inmates (Dryburgh, 2009). Throughout their time in Corcoran State prison, the prisoners were secluded in their prison cell for twenty-three hours of the day and were just permitted out of their prison cell for 60 minutes, in which they could partake in minimum activities such as exercise (Dryburgh, 2009). The principal whistleblowers in the Corcoran State Prison case were two guards, Steve Rigg and Richard Caruso.
I don 't think of Edward Snowden as a hero or a traitor. I do think what he did was bad he informed the general public of what the federal government is doing and the people have the right to know. If my best friend 's girlfriend was cheating on him and I told him about it does that make me a traitor? that 's an over simplified comparison but the point is that we as people of the "free world" have the right to know. The federal government should not have the ability to monitor your activity without a warrant without a just cause.
When Obama was asked if he was going to pardon Snowden, President Obama stated, “I can 't pardon somebody who hasn 't gone before a court and presented themselves, so that 's not something that I would comment on at this point.” In Edward Snowden’s defense, why would he try to go in front of a court where he wouldn’t be given the right of freedom of speech because under that Espionage Act he can’t explain his actions? Another reason why President Obama should give him a pardon is because he’s being charged for crimes he didn’t commit with the Espionage Act. He didn’t sell the information for a large sum of money or give it to enemies, and lastly, he worked at the direction of a foreign government so why is the United States charging him. No one sees the sacrifice Snowden made because he’s giving up more than just information he’s giving up his life for the rights of American
Facebook posts, candlelight vigils, days of mourning, and for Ariana Grande to cancel her tour. Terrorists want reactions, and that is exactly what people give them after every type of terrorist attack. There is nothing wrong with the Facebook posts, candlelight vigils, and dedications. The problem is that is all that is done. The United States government needs to start taking extreme measures to keep citizens safe by monitoring suspected terrorists, and the government needs to start requiring extreme security scans before letting one into any public event.
If possible put your concerns in writing with details and names, dates and places. Anyone who whistle blows has a right to legal protection. Managers have a duty to support members of staff who report any incidents of unprofessional conduct or poor practice.
The government debated about Snowden being considered a traitor or patriot of the country. The definition of a traitor is a person who is guilty of treason or treachery in betraying friends, country, family, etc. Definition of Treason is the crime of betraying one's country, by attempting to kill, sovereign, overthrow the government, or giving aid and/or comfort to the enemies government. Snowden was not giving aid or comfort to America’s enemies, unless the citizens of America are considered the enemy to the
Snowden was committed to doing the right thing so he revealed the different spying operations that were going on within the N.S.A. He became a whistleblower who rescued American citizens from being monitored through illegal surveillance and was looked upon as a
Impeaching the president is accusing the president of a crime, and putting him in jail, or any other punishment. Impeachment is a very serious and time consuming process, but is for the good of the people. Impeachment makes the president and the people even in crime, and many people love impeachment if it is needed. Impeachment has a lot of steps, and people checking each other, but there hasn 't been to many real impeachments that have taken action. Impeachment takes some time with the checking of everything, and the decisions but it pays off in the end.
During this time, he noticed the depth of the NSA’s constant surveillance. During his time working for Booz Allen, Mr. Snowden started to make copies of classified documents and files, all of which he found disturbing and invasive. These documents were full of the information behind the NSA’s national surveillance, and the amount of files he had extracted was outstanding. He told his supervisor he was taking a leave of absence for medicinal reasons, and took the smuggled information with him. Snowden scheduled to meet with journalists from The Guardian after traveling to China.
The case study presented many issues identified in the criminal justice system. The issue of police brutality is a direct action when authority abuse their possession of power by taking advantage of a population that should be protected by their most basic right. The exposure of cruel, unusual, and and explosive treatment is coming from the colleague of the abusers. Whistle-blowing has gone through a series of changes in the definitions Frederick Elliston has composed four components; it is the actions of an individual to make information public, the information becomes public, the information is about the wrong doing of an organization, and the person exposing the wrongdoing has some former or current affiliations in which they report(Dryburgh,2009.
Snowden’s actions proved his incompetence as a professional. He basically took all the files and dumped them on newspapers doorsteps. If his intentions were for the government to reform the NSA activities so they protected civil liberties more, he would have stayed at the agency longer and collected more information and carefully presented it to the people who do the changes, not to the public. 2. Snowden harmed the relationship between the US and its allies.
Some consider him a hero, and others consider him a traitor. Who is he? Edward Snowden. You might remember Snowden from 2013, when he leaked hundreds of highly classified documents concerning invasion of privacy against Americans by the National Security Agency. We know what Snowden did, but who really is he?
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW The review of literature of this study broadly focused on whistleblowing. There have been several attempts to define whistleblowing, but certainly there is no generally accepted definition. According to Near and Miceli (1985), which are often referred by researchers, whistleblowing is a process whereby a current or former member of an organization discloses practices or activities believe to be illegal, immoral or illegitimate, to those who may be able to effect change. The practices or activities can be refer to personal misbehavior such as stealing, waste, mismanagement, safety problems, sexual harassment, unfair discrimination and legal violations (Dasgupta & Kesharwani, 2010).