Mercy Otis Warren was a female writer who had an influence on certain issues during the later half of the Eighteenth Century. From the era of the Revolution to the formation of the Constitution, Warren spread her political viewpoints and beliefs through the writing of plays, booklets, etc. Her political involvement can be credited to the familial influence of her father and brother. If not for this, Warren would not have, in the end, gained the respect of several Revolutionary figures, including Samuel Adams and George Washington (Kort). As her written works began to grow in popularity, Mercy Otis Warren was able to spread her anti-federalist ideas.
In the 1770's, before the controversy between the federalists and antifederalists, people began to discuss the idea of independence from Britain, and this was no different for Mercy Otis Warren. She was one who pushed for independence. Warren believed that the British should not overly force their sovereignty and violate the freedom of the colonists. She was opposed to the tenacity of which the royal governor of Massachusetts, Thomas Hutchinson, used to carry out the king's orders. To show her disapproval, she wrote the play "The Adulateur", which showed the strain between Britain and the Colonies
…show more content…
As an Anti Federalist, Warren was opposed to the idea of the new Constitution. She believed that the United States was moving towards consolidated government rather than state sovereignty. She felt that the federal government should not have complete control (Wolverton). This would be hypocritical towards one of the original ambitions of the Revolution, separating from a government that was too powerful over them. She believed that Federalists, such as John Adams, had not only lost their Revolutionary principles, but they have also begun to renounce republicanism
To start off; Rebecca Motte’s maiden name was Brewton, and her husband’s last name was Motte, but her middle name was unknown. Rebecca Motte was born in Charleston South Carolina, and had lived there until she died. She and her husband started their family, and “ended” it there too. Rebecca and her husband Jacob Motte lived in a nice big home in South Carolina close to the South Santee River; just outside of Charleston. They were slave owners who had a plantation called the Fairfield Plantation which was also in Charleston.
Mercy Otis Warren: Exemplar for the Women who Change America The Pre-Revolutionary War and the Revolutionary War gave rise to many leaders and pioneers. It gave an edge to the quiet people. Soon, protest arises and men take action and arms, while women cheer on the rebels. Mercy Otis Warren was one of the women, but helped protest through the pen and paper.
Mercy Otis Warren is one of four prominent people who came from the small village of West Barnstable, Massachusetts. Mercy is one of two, of these people, that were heavily involved in the American Revolution; the only other being her older brother. She made many different, but important, contributions to the American Revolutionary War. These contributions took place before, during, and after the American Revolution.
After the independence of the United States was a good thing, but at the same time there were problems with the creation of the nation. First problems began with the Articles of Confederation because in 1777, the Articles of Confederation established a weak confederal Government that operated until 1789. The articles were a compilation of plans written by the Governors of each of the thirteen colonies. Although it was an important step toward unification successful, the weakness of those articles was giving no importance to all the problems of the young country. This document, however, would not be effective without the ratification of the thirteen States.
Mercy Otis Warren was born in Barnstable, Massachusetts, on September 14, 1728 and was one of thirteen children. At an early age, Mercy developed a keen interest in politics, that only grew stronger as she grew. She was surrounded by political protestants, some including her brother, James Otis, and her husband, James Warren, whom she married November 14, 1754. She was born into the prosperous Cape Cod family and was particularly well off as a child. Although Mercy Otis had no formal schooling, her uncle, the Rev. Jonathon Russell, allowed her to sit in almost all her brothers tutoring lessons.
Mercy Otis Warren also opposed the Constitution saying that, “...There is no provision for a rotation nor anything else to prevent a political office from remaining in the same hands for life.” (Doc #2) Warren worried that one person ruling up to death would give him too much power and leading him to believe he is superior and eventually
John Adams was such a crucial asset to what American history is today. Weather he was acting as a loyar, critic, or leader he has impacted America in some of the greatest ways possible. He was there for our country with bravery and strength as he stood by the rights of the people always putting them first. Aside from being a delegate of the Constitutional Convention John Adams served as a diplomat in Europe, contributed in the negotiation of the Treaty of Paris, and was America’s first vice president and second president. His ableness to conquer all of these achievements didn’t just come out of thin air it started with his early life.
When the United States of America began to fight the Revolutionary War in 1775, they would need a governing body to run the new country. However, seeing as they had just escaped from a tyrannical government under England, the Articles of Confederation gave the states a very large amount of power so that they would not have the same problem again. However, although this government gave many states what they wanted, it was not strong enough to run a country. So, when writing a new Constitution the founding fathers gave more power to the federal government than the states because of the former government.
The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of
After the American Revolutionary War, many Americans were opposed to the idea of a strong central government. They saw the idea of a strong centralized government as a gateway back into the familiar tyrannical government and abuse of power that they had just fought so hard to free themselves of. The idea of creating a new Constitution was unnecessary to some because the Articles of Confederation were already in place. The non-supporters of the newly proposed Constitution called themselves “Anti- Federalist.” Naturally, many of the supporters of the new Constitution felt that it was very much needed and they felt as if the Articles of Confederation were not strong enough to functionally run the government.
Throughout the Revolutionary War, the men now known as the Founding Fathers or Sons of Liberty were regarded as superstars and icons. Meanwhile, the women of the time period played a behind the scenes role that ultimately led to the success of the colonists just as much as the men’s actions did. Perhaps the most famous of these women was Elizabeth Griscom, also known as Betsy Ross. She lived a life of fulfillment and her support for the colonies never wavered; she was a force to be reckoned with. Through her contributions concerning the nation’s flag and her involvement with the patriotic Free Quakers, she has become the poster woman of the American Revolution.
They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.
Abigail Adams was extremely influential to the nation’s beginnings due to her drive to push certain decisions and debates through the status of her husband. She found the issues of women’s rights and slavery while also finding local politics to be important. As the wife of a president, Abigail Adams was able to use her status in a way to push and bring to life her political agenda. Abigail Adams was able to provide her husband with information and insights of the political situation in Boston during his decade long trip through numerous letters that had been exchanged for so long. Her letters regarding the political situation “included commentary on the American struggle for independence and the political structure of the new republic.”
In the late 18th century, America’s founding fathers would have never dreamed of being organized into different political factions: for they were not fans of them. In Federalist 10, James Madison, leading Democratic-Republican thinker, stated that he was skeptical of factions. In his Farewell Address, George Washington, the first President of the United States, warned the American public against the egotistic political factions. Both Madison and Washington believed that factions were signs of corruption. Despite the public warnings against factions, two political parties emerged from our founding fathers: the Federalists, and the Democratic-Republicans.
In 1787 many important people, like Benjamin Franklin and John Hancock, had different views and beliefs on ratifying the Constitution. This lead to two groups forming the federalists and the anti federalists. The federalist believed that the Constitution should be ratified for the sake of a strong government, while the anti federalist believed that the Constitution should not be ratified because of the lack of individual rights. Specifically, the antifederalists point of view was more reasonable towards the public due to the fact the anti federalists wanted power within each state and not the central government. One reason why the anti federalist’s point of view is more sensible than the federalists is because the anti federalist thought