Near the beginning of act II, Brutus has a soliloquy in which he is trying to decide whether joining the conspiracy is the right thing to do. He discusses reasons for why killing Caesar may be appropriate for the current situation of him being crowned king. Brutus also reveals his thoughts about some of Caesar’s behavior and what could happen (based on human nature) if he is given power. In the end, he decides to join with the conspiracy and kill Caesar. I agree with Brutus’s decision. If Caesar is crowned, he gains ultimate power. Caesar can take over Rome if he is given this type of power, but killing him can stop this from happening. Caesar tries to rid of everyone that is in opposition to him. During the second scene of act I, Casca says to Brutus and Cassius, “Murellus and Flavius, for pulling scarves off of Caesar’s images, are put to silence,” (I, ii, 287-288). This is implying that since Murellus and Flavius took decorations off of Caesar’s statues, they were taken from their authoratative positions. Doing this shows that Caesar is abusing his power and getting rid of everyone and everything that opposes or may oppose him. Another thing that shows that Caesar shouldn’t be allowed to be king is how he treats his own wife. “Stand you directly in Antonio’s way when …show more content…
Brutus uses an analogy in his soliloquy that states, “And therefore think him as a serpent’s egg, which, hatched, would as his kind, grow mischievous, and kill him in the shell,” (II, i, 32-34). This analogy implements the idea that if the conspirators kill Caesar (the serpent) before he gets crowned king and rises to power (hatches), then they can stop him from taking advantage of his power (hatching and growing mischievous). If Caesar isn’t stopped now, then he won’t be stopped, because once he gains power he has full
Caesar was a great military leader, he was a man of strength, and he conquered all of Rome. Caesar was not afraid to take charge to take Rome high and make them more powerful. If he had to Caesar would kill anyone that stood in his way of making Rome more powerful. “Kill everyone inside” “without hesitation, his men, swords drown, burst inside the bar, and soon the street was quiet.”
Julius Caesar was one of Rome’s most successful and outstanding leaders. The question of whether or not he deserved to die is very simple. No, Julius Caesar did not deserve to be assassinated for the good of Rome because he was the good of Rome. Politically, militaristically, and economically he benefited Rome. Did the conspirators kill Caesar for the good of Rome or for their own personal motives?
The conspiracy wishes to have Caesar dead before he is crowned king. They believe that as soon as he is crowned, he will turn dangerous, as Brutus mentions in (II ,i ,10-18). In this analogy, Brutus compares Caesar to a serpent, which is a dangerous and poisonous snake. The comparison explains that a serpent is not dangerous while it is still in the egg, but once it hatches it is a deadly animal. Brutus feels the same way about Caesar.
His main point boils down to ambition being a negative as he says to the crowd, in his explanation of the death ‘as he was ambitious, I slew him.” Brutus them attempts to persuade the crowd that he is trustworthy and did this for the good of Rome. He explains to the crowd “ As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honour him…” Though Caesar did all these great things, it was the fatal flaw of ambition that brought the daggers to him. In the mind of the conspirators they ask the crowd the rhetorical question,“Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?”
20-22). Brutus admits to never seeing evidence of Caesar’s ambitiousness but he knows that as a person grows they often forget their roots. Before his death he also mentions that he is surer in killing himself than he ever was before killing Caesar. This shows that he could never convince himself that murdering his friend would be best for Rome. Throughout the play, Brutus has conflicted feelings about killing Caesar which lead him to become the tragic
Caesar only made laws to better Rome, not just to benefit himself. In conclusion, I believe that the reasons he did not want to be King outweigh the reasons he did want to be King. From giving up a consulship, to declining Roman leadership titles, to making changes to the Roman culture no one agreed with, one can conclude that Caesar clearly did not want to be
Brutus has a vision, and he intends it to work out in every way he plans. In a sense he achieves what he wants, and killing Caesar may have been crucial to his short-lived success.
Brutus and the senators had made a plan to kill Caesar. Even though Caesar was his friend, Brutus joins the conspiracyagainst Caesar’s life because he feels that Caesar’s death is better for Rome. Brutus did not want to allow Caesar to rise to power and turn his back onto the people of Rome. Brutus felt like Caesar was being a dictator. “Which, hatched, would as his kind grow mischievous, And kill him in a shell” (2,1,33-34) Similar to how Cady, Janice and Damian made a plan to destroy Regina.
I also think that Brutus is against himself in joining the conspiracy. “No, not an oath. If not the face of men, the sufferance of our souls, the time's abuse-if these be motives weak, break off bedtimes, in every hence to his ideal bed.” (Ⅱ,ⅰ, 120-126). What Brutus informes is that the conspiracy shouldn’t proceed with an oath due to the lack ability of the idea of killing Caesar.
“Death is not the greatest loss in life. The greatest loss is what dies while still alive.” This quote by 2pac relates to the tragedy of Julius Caesar. Caesar had so much potential and did many things for Rome. Caesar was murdered for the sole fact that others were afraid of a tyrant running Rome.
When Brutus was talking to the conspirators Brutus was going back and forth think if he should help the conspirators kill Julius Caesar. He was going back and forth because he was thinking of the power he could have and could rule Rome. The reason behind Brutus killing Caesar was for the better of Rome. If Brutus would not have killed Caesar, Rome would have turned into a dictatorship, and in turn it would have ruined Rome and all of its people. Brutus did not kill Julius just for the power to rule Rome, he killed Julius to save Rome from Caesar’s dictatorship.
And while Brutus did work in part with other conspirators, which eventually led to him killing Caesar, he did it for a more morally sound reason which was that Caesar was going to cause the downfall of Rome because he was too ambitious, which is ironic because Caesar's death led to a string of unfit leaders, and civil unrest that eventually led to the downfall of the roman empire. Brutus was also focused on preventing corruption. “The name of Cassius honors this corruption,/ And chastisement doth therefore hide his head (IV.iii.15-6)... Remember March, the ides of March remember./ Did not great Julius bleed for justice' sake” (IV.iii.18-9).
Brutus believes that Caesar will do more harm than good to the people, and reap benefits for himself. Brutus has already said this, but had said it in his own words, (II, i, 12-14). He has no clue if Caesar will use his power for the good and betterment for the people, or use it for his own needs and other
During the Act 1, Scene ii, Brutus tells the audience that he loves Caesar and has never seen him misuse his power. Brutus makes his judgment based on possibilities and not
Is it justified to kill someone because they have gained too much power and are going to use it for the worse? Brutus has a very bad circumstance on his hands, he can kill Caesar and possibly be executed for his actions or he can let Caesar become king and watch Rome fall. There are many reasons why Brutus should and should not join the conspiracy. Brutus says, “I know no personal reason to spurn at him But for the general.” (II,i,11).