Why Is It Better To Vote Better Than Direct Vote

571 Words3 Pages

Electoral and Direct votes fight over the U.S population, to see which process can lead to victory. Electoral College, a simple yet safer process to elect a new president, is obviously the better option for the states. It takes the percentage of the votes that the state provided, and can make that opinion into a reality. Electoral College even benefits stability and security to the states it's accounted for., but all direct votes disagree. Direct votes may provide individual voting, yet it still isn't a safer way to elect. The direct voting can increase in power, and it won't make the options equal. Although direct voting claims to be independent choice, electoral college is the safer and easier way to elect for the whole state.
Electoral College provides security to the states. This means U.S citizens don't have to fear about false mistakes. Besides being easier to elect, Electoral College is a process the government has used over time to protect the U.S. Nothing terrible has happened, during, or even after this process of election, and it completely makes sense why. Trent England stated, "In most presidential races, the Electoral College outcome is more decisive than the popular vote result, making clear who is the legitimate president." This means citizens can rely on the Electoral College for a …show more content…

First you decide which candidate you will vote for. Then you just see as the voting goes on in your state and see how many electoral votes will choose the future president. Trent England proclaimed, "The people vote to determine how their state will cast its electoral votes. The candidate with a majority of those electoral votes becomes president. It isn't really that complicated, and it certainly isn't undemocratic." It can easily be done just like this, and it is a win for most majority of the population. Hopefully, direct votes won't take away this

Open Document