Electoral and Direct votes fight over the U.S population, to see which process can lead to victory. Electoral College, a simple yet safer process to elect a new president, is obviously the better option for the states. It takes the percentage of the votes that the state provided, and can make that opinion into a reality. Electoral College even benefits stability and security to the states it's accounted for., but all direct votes disagree. Direct votes may provide individual voting, yet it still isn't a safer way to elect. The direct voting can increase in power, and it won't make the options equal. Although direct voting claims to be independent choice, electoral college is the safer and easier way to elect for the whole state.
Electoral College provides security to the states. This means U.S citizens don't have to fear about false mistakes. Besides being easier to elect, Electoral College is a process the government has used over time to protect the U.S. Nothing terrible has happened, during, or even after this process of election, and it completely makes sense why. Trent England stated, "In most presidential races, the Electoral College outcome is more decisive than the popular vote result, making clear who is the legitimate president." This means citizens can rely on the Electoral College for a
…show more content…
First you decide which candidate you will vote for. Then you just see as the voting goes on in your state and see how many electoral votes will choose the future president. Trent England proclaimed, "The people vote to determine how their state will cast its electoral votes. The candidate with a majority of those electoral votes becomes president. It isn't really that complicated, and it certainly isn't undemocratic." It can easily be done just like this, and it is a win for most majority of the population. Hopefully, direct votes won't take away this
The Framers of the Constitution created the Electoral College as a compromise between electing the President directly by popular vote and having Congress choose the President. At the time, there were concerns about electing the President directly, such as the lack of communication and travel infrastructure to facilitate a national election and the possibility of uneducated voters being easily swayed by popular demagogues. Additionally, the Framers were concerned that smaller states would be overshadowed by larger ones in a direct popular vote. The Electoral College has several pros and cons.
Electoral College has been in United States for a long period of time. The system was formed to select a president through an indirect election and to avoid suspicion of corruption and belief of compromised votes, but the Electoral College never worked as it was intended to work by founding fathers. There are many pros and cons for this system but one of the major con of this system is that people in the U.S. doesn’t think that their opinions about choosing president really matters because of the Electoral College and I also feel the same way about it. I think there are more cons of Electoral College than pros. One the major con is that people in U.S don’t feel that their vote matters because Electoral College redistributes its vote every
The United States of America Electoral College is a team who’s accountable for choosing the President as well as the Vice President, virtually every four years. The United States is known not to be a “true” democracy because of the electoral college. There are rules within the United States Electoral College that are straightforward. Every state is provided several electors.
In a survey conducted by Lydia Saad, “Sixty-three percent would abolish this unique, but sometimes controversial, mechanism for electing presidents that was devised by the framers of the Constitution”. Furthermore, “between 61% and 66% of all major party groups saying they would vote to do away with the Electoral College if they could” (Saad). Most Americans as well as politicians are ready to get rid of the extremely flawed electoral
Individuals in each state place a ballot for whom they want their next president and vice president to be. The elector places their vote based on the majority of the popular vote within their represented state. All electors in the state vote the same, excluding two states. 100 votes are reserved for the senators, while 438 are divided within the district. A candidate needs 270 electoral college votes to win.
Although I also don’t believe they should use direct popular vote. The problem with the electoral college is that is disguises the legit results of the election, and brings an unfair advantage. The problem with direct popular vote as I stated earlier leaves the smaller areas with less representation. With direct popular vote a candidate will focus mainly on the higher populated areas as a strategy to win. How unfair is that to areas that have a low population?
This issue has had profound effects on the health of US elections and the essence of democracy. The state-by-state method can silence the will and choices of millions of people, as their votes do not carry the same weight in certain key swing states. Comparing this system to the potential benefits of a nationwide vote for the president, the current system is flawed, and a nationwide vote could be the rectification that US democracy needs. The nationwide vote would likely increase voter turnout in America because it will result in greater competition and impact, encouraging people to vote. This is supported by the fact that "turnout in competitive states is usually higher than in the rest of the country"[^2^].
In november of 2016, many of us went to our designated voting polls to cast a vote for our next President of the United States. Our government creates this allured idea that our votes matter, however this isn’t the case. The Electoral College is the process which is responsible for electing the President of the United States. In 48 states, after all the votes are accounted for, the political party whose candidate received a majority in a particular state is given all of the votes for that state. For example, if the majority votes are republican in Virginia, then all 13 of Virginia’s votes go towards the republican candidate, even if 49% of the votes are democratic.
If we somehow happened to be a capable vote, then we ought to have the capacity to really pick who might be president. The Electoral College removes that from us. The Electoral College is not by any stretch of the imagination reasonable for our rights and our opportunity. It, for the most part, takes away the ability to vote the president. The Electoral College was made in a period when votes were harder to gather and number.
Although this case addressed voter equality among different state counties, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled that all state elections have to obey the “one person, one vote” principle. Nonetheless, because of a lack of voter equality through the Electoral College, it is questionable if US citizens themselves are fully able to elect leaders, a statue that is promised by a true democracy. Today, voters are denied their freedom to cast their bona fide vote and have it count
In 1787, years after the founding of the United States, the Constitutional Convention met to decide how the new nation would govern itself. The delegates understood that the need for a leader was necessary but still bitterly remembered how Britain abused of its power. The delegates agreed that the President and Vice President should be chosen informally and not based on the direct popular vote, thus gave birth to the Electoral College. The Electoral College is defined as “a body of people representing the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the election of the president and vice president.” Since 1787 the Electoral College has been the system for voting in the United States, but with our nation ever more changing and growing it
(Black, 2012) So, while it is clear that the Electoral College was set up to ensure all states have a voice, it now seems to have the ability to take away the voice of the people. It is necessary to look at our voting process and make the necessary changes needed to ensure the process of electing our President represents the voice of the people. By switching to a majority vote we ensure that the voice of all people are not only heard, but are represented equally, which is how it should be under the one-person, one-vote
The number of electors in each state is equaled two plus one for each member of the House of Representatives, and Washington DC has three votes, bringing the total number of electors to 538 (“What is the Electoral College?”). It’s a well-known fact that when the public goes to vote for a candidate they also vote for the corresponding vice president. A much less well-known fact is that they are actually voting for the electors as well; by voting democratic or republican the corresponding electors for the party are elected as well (“Electoral College” 2010). Then on the Monday after the second Wednesday of December the electors assemble in a central location in each state and cast their votes for president. In forty-eight states, there is a “winner-take-all-system” where the highest vote getter in the state gets all the electoral votes, however in two states, Maine and Nebraska, there is a proportionality system in place; where if one third of the votes are for one party and two thirds are for another, the electors will split and one third of the state electoral votes will go to one party and the rest will go to another (“What is the Electoral College?”).
Several years after the United States came to be, the Constitutional Convention met to determine how the new nation should govern itself. The delegates saw that it was crucial to have a president and vice president, but the delegates did not want these offices to reflect how the colonies were treated under the British rule. The delegates believed that the president’s power should be limited, and that he should be chosen through the system known as the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a body of people who represent the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the electing of the president and vice president. Many citizens feel that the Electoral College goes against our nation’s principle of representative democracy, while others
This is strictly why the Electoral College should be taken off the amendments and if not abolished. The Electoral College has failed three times in history, and the loser ended up winning because of state votes and not popularity votes. If we get rid of the Electoral College we will be able to vote directly, and citizens votes will be equal without having to worry about candidates cheating any kind of system for personal gain. Getting rid of the twelfth amendment will solve this issue like I have stated above, If we do not act; candidates will keep on deceiving the system. We’ve been trying to get rid of the Electoral College for the past couple years now, but we as the people have failed to act and therefore they will put it to the side and say “Don't worry, we will get to it”.