If god is so powerful and controls everything then why is there pain, deaths, natural disasters and so much sadness all over the world? That’s something an atheist would say but what if god lets these events happen for a specific reason. for example, David had a bad car accident, he is at the hospital in critical conditions. He comes from a family that believes in god, right before he passes away David tells his mom not to worry that god has called upon him and he is going to a better place. As a Christian looking at it this way it shows god working towards a greater good, in this situation death is not evil and in David’s case not feared. If god exist then the devil is also real, from my point of view as a Christian the good that happens in this world is credited to god and the evil that happens is credited to the devil. Point of view, beliefs and experience play a big role on how someone interprets a bad situation (evil) and a good situation. Philosophers like William Rowe’s have arguments that support one and not the other, then you have philosophers like Anselm of Canterbury that would argue the opposite of William Rowe’s point of view. Using philosopher’s arguments, …show more content…
I agree with Socrates, I don’t know what comes after death so therefore, I shouldn’t fear it. However, it is very easy to disagree with Socrates as well. What if after death, the men goes through the most painful and terrifying experience someone could ever experience? Since we are not certain on what comes next after death? So, the fear of death comes down to the person personal assessment on death its self. Death is the only thing that’s 100% certain to happen in this universe, now, is death evil or good? No one will have an answer for that. However, the way you live before dying could be evil or good, which can lead to the statement of “he died as a good man” or “he died an evil
This question has plagued many a mind. Why do things such as war, famine, and death exist in the world? If God really cared about the state of the earth, would He not intervene? To answer this question, Lewis writes, one must first have a standard by which to judge right and wrong. Lewis insists that beliefs like those held in atheism do not have a standard by which to judge.
The devil can cause humans to create bad things where there are none, which leads them to act hurtfully towards others in their “mission” to stop or stay away from the fear they have created in themselves. I believe that there are parallels to the “beast” in the real world, the main one being the devil because he is a nonfictional character even though he is used in some fictional novels. The devil can tempt us to do things we know we shouldn’t, sometimes out of the fear he is able to place within us, and can cause us to give into darkness unless we fight it or ask God for help. Another parallel to the “beast” could be ghosts, who could persuade us to do bad things even though we can’t see them with our eyes. And even uncertainty and worry, which I believe is the devil pulling at us, can be a parallel, leading us into fear and the mess that comes along with it.
Most of the individuals, to be specific, numbers 1,3 and 4 answered that they we are most afraid of death. They said we are afraid of death of a loved one,when and how we ourselves are going to die, and even thinking about death is problem. On the other hand, Individuals numbers 2 and 5 both said that we are most afraid of the unknown and not being control. This answer is similar to the first response because we as humans are cannot contain death, we cannot control it and we also do not know when or how we are going to die.
After being sentenced to death, he doesn’t fear from the unknown and instead thinks that death can also be a blessing from god to be away from evil on the earth. Furthermore he says that death can be like taking a trip to another place to get rid of the fake people. Also, it would be not smart to fear about life after death when you are actually alive. Socrates rather chooses to treat the death as a grace of the god and believes that a good person gets good blessings whether he or she is alive or dead. Also the reasoning at the end of the quotes shows his philosophy that an assumption cannot be always predicted correct or accurate if it is not proved in
The deductive problem of evil defines omnipotence as having no bounds to power and being all-good as having the will to prevent and stop any evil that one possibly can. Furthermore, Adams presents how much this problem is amplified when considering horrendous evils that would push the average person to “doubt the positive meaning of their lives”(Adams 300). Adams acknowledges that this definition of God’s qualities alongside the definition of horrendous evils hinders the existence of the Christian God. God is one who is supposed to hold love for all of his creations, but allowing for his creations to suffer needlessly doesn’t align with this love. This problem causes people to question not only God’s love for them but also God’s reasoning in their suffering and their living.
JL Mackie was persuasive in his argument by showing that belief in an almighty God is not rational. He proves this by posing the problem of evil. According to JL Mackie, if God exists and is omniscient, omnipotent, and good then evil would not exist. However, evil exists in this world, sometimes in the form of undeserved suffering (diseases that affect humans, earthquakes, famines ...) and others perpetrated by man (murders, wars ...). If God exists and has the capability to be powerful, good, omniscient and omnipotent, why would he let evil be perpetrated?
Understandably, the inevitable idea of death is feared by many myself included, however that is exactly why it is important to realize that we need to appreciate every moment we go through, even the bad ones because without that, life would have no meaning to it. The biggest mistake one can make is thinking life has a monetary value. Amanda Ripley’s article What Is a Life Worth? Explains how the
Neal Shusterman once said "Death must exist for life to have meaning." And although some may strongly disagree with this and see death as the exact opposite, I agree with Shusterman. Death plays a large part in someone's life, causing depression and grief. This could change a person tremendously by adapting to life without that loved one and becoming more independent. In this way, death can be positive.
However, because we don’t know what death is, it isn’t strange that we fear it. People like to have control over things. And when we can’t control something, we fear it. Throughout the years, we took more and more control over nature, for example, building a dam to protect ourselves from the water, but we still cannot control earthquakes, and therefore we fear them.
The only way that Socrates could show truly that one should not fear death, and that he believed this idea wholeheartedly was to face death himself and do so without fear. This is why Socrates told the jurors after he had been sentenced to death, "This perhaps had to happen, and I think it is as it should be" (Apology, 39b). Socrates’ death “had to happen” because he was following the will of the gods and because it was a vital component in convincing others that they ought not to fear death. Socrates death was “as it should be” because it was the only way to ultimately prove to others that it was not necessary to fear death and this Socrates believed was a
“…if I disobeyed the oracle because I was afraid of death: then I should be fancying that I was wise when I was not wise. For this fear of death is indeed the pretence of wisdom, and not real wisdom, being the appearance of the unknown: since no one knows whether death, which they in their fear apprehend to be the greatest evil, may not be the greatest good” (Apology, 29a-29b). This potent statement not only highlights Socrates’ wisdom, it effectively makes use of his belief that he is wise because he knows nothing. By saying that he knows nothing of the afterlife, it gives him the reason to illustrate to his audience that he cannot fear what he does not know.
This quotation is significant because it represents Socrates’ ideas about death. He believes that fearing the unknown is unreasonable because we don’t know what happens after death. Socrates also believes that “being dead is one of two things” (Socrates 58); either you feel nothing at all or it is a “journey from here to another place” (Socrates 59). Fearing something we don’t now is not going to get us anywhere except limit our potential. Although, death is a frightful concept, it might also be a good thing.
The devil in the story is the subconscious and innate desires of humanity because he reveals that, “Evil is the nature of mankind. Evil must be your only happiness. Welcome again, my children, to the communion of your race” (Hawthorne 8). Once a person comes to the realization of his or her own personal
One of the causes of our fear of dying is when we know we will cease to be present in somebody else’s life. When we realized that all of us will be forgotten, like we have never existed, that we will go into oblivion forever, we become afraid and terrified. This happens usually when we are about to die because when we look back to what our life has become and realized that we had no one that we could actually say “I became a major part in his/her life”, we know that no one will remember us, like all we have done was just a blur from a distant, half-remembered world. The only thing that lives on when we die is the memory of us. And that memory is from someone who had a relationship with us.
Death is a part of life that everyone experiences in some way, whether it be their own or even being affected by the death of another. Many people dwell on the thought of their own death, wondering how or when it will occur. Then, it is even a massive question in society; what will happen to us when we die? In the play “Everyman,” with the main topic being death, it is only fitting that the main character was told that he is going to die. For some people, it may be difficult to speak about death, scary even.