In order to understand the impact of proposed gun control laws, it is vital to understand gun control itself. Gun control laws are regulations of the owning, manufacturing, and use of firearms. In the United States, some see gun control as needed and others see it as a form of tyranny. This divide in beliefs is what has caused gun control to be such a highly discussed issue. The emotional connection that surrounds it, due to shootings and gun violence, also leads people to misjudge the impact on crime that the proposed laws may have. Gun control, a highly controversial topic, is often misunderstood when referencing its impact it would have on crime, this is due to the lack of knowledge surrounding the United States’ past and present position …show more content…
Examples of those features are a folding or telescoping stock, a pistol grip, and a flash suppressor or threaded barrel. These features are for comfortability of the shooter and do not impact the ballistics of the bullet. Therefore, it can be inferred that the writers of the Assault Weapons Ban were trying to limit weapons that looked like a threat rather than combatting against weapons that were used primarily in gun crime. Because of this, the impact on crime by the Assault Weapon Ban was minimal at best. As said in a study by UPenn when addressing the Assault Weapon Ban, “We cannot clearly credit the ban with any of the nation’s recent drop in gun violence. And, indeed, there has been no discernible reduction in the lethality and injuriousness of gun violence.” (Plumer, “Everything You Need to Know about the Assault Weapons Ban, in One Post”). The ban did not have much of an impact mainly due to the fact that before the ban, assault weapons were only used in two to eight percent of gun crime (Plumer, “Everything You Need to Know about the Assault Weapons Ban, in One Post”). Another very important variable to consider about the Assault Weapons Ban is that it allowed for weapons defined by the ban that were owned previous to the law, to be legally owned. This variable, being essentially a loophole, allowed for …show more content…
When combining all of these factors of gun control laws, past and present, the result is not quite clear. While taking away all guns that contribute to violent crime would be brilliant on paper, it would limit the ability of citizens to protect themselves. Leaving many without proper means of home protection and subjected to violent crime. The absence of firearms in the hands of U.S. citizens could also cause an uproar across the country. The confusion, in regards to statistics and effectiveness of gun control laws, is due to the different interpretation of crime, which undoubtedly is due to prior bias by the interpreter. This bias will most likely never completely leave the minds of debaters when arguing on the topic of gun control, forcing each individual to develop an opinion based on their own beliefs despite the statistics involved. Works Cited “Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.” National Firearms Act | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, www.atf.gov/rules-and -regulations/national-firearms-act. “Do Guns Save Lives.” Gun Sources, 1 May 2017, gunsources. com/guns-save-lives/. “Guns in America | Facts and Statistics about Firearms in the USA.” Guns in America | Facts and Statistics about Firearms in the USA, americangunfacts.com/.
I don’t want more crime just because people have stricter gun laws. Taking away guns may cause people to go to other ways of committing violent crimes. I also think if we have don’t have more gun control laws, then gun deaths would reduce dramatically. American children under age 15 were nine times more likely to die of a gun accident than children in other advanced wealthy countries. About 200 Americans go to emergency rooms every day with gunshot wounds (Frum).
The debate surrounding gun control and gun violence has been an ongoing controversy in many communities and America as a whole. As gun violence increase each year, views and opinions are rising, which not only have created tension in communities, but also has become a major debate in society. Although some critics argue that guns bring an overall negative impact to the country, others comment that guns are crucial to the beliefs and views of people today as well as important to their culture. In the context of today's society, many people in America are viewing gun control as an infringement of their rights and its threat towards their ability to protect, thus questioning: To what extent should gun use and possession should be controlled?
It analyzes the upshot of previous gun control laws and reflects why firearms can be equally effective and ineffective. This book delivers many statistics, making it incredibly fascinating for many individuals who can relate to the various diverse opinions regarding gun control. Likewise, it divulges a long history of gun control in America, extending back to the first English conquerors of the New World. Once more, Living with Guns presented a reasonable deportment on gun control and evaluated the pros and cons of employing gun control laws mutually. Together these two authors shared a resemblance in captivating the identical manner regarding gun control.
Gun control as stated in the last source is a major issue in America. Studies have been done to see if there is any correlation between higher or lower crimes involving guns due to strong or weak gun control policies. This journal talks about how they performed a study involving four states Florida, Texas, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. From these four states they used statistics on specific types of crimes that could involve a gun, murder, property crime, rape, assault, and many more. When they studied these states with different gun policies with these types of crimes they found that there is zero correlation to the amount of crimes involving guns to the laws in place.
Just in In the United States itself has been said that a gun has been the top most violent weapon in violent crimes. Just into 2011, 128,900 of crimes were committed with firearms(Klimas). Also in the year of 2014,8,124 murders were used just by fire-arms(Quadl). Gun control is not only entirely reasonable but also certain to be effective. Some of the society needs to recognize in-state Manning fully that legally owning or selling guns only puts another life at risk.
Gun ownership doesn’t increase crime. “While gun ownership doubled in the twentieth century, the murder rate decreased.” (Thomas Sowell, Paragraph 3) Time and time again, different countries and states increase in gun ownership and crime seems to deteriorate. To those who say that it is just a coincidence, the facts say otherwise. Gun control laws infringe upon the right to self-defense and deny people a sense of safety.
The largest effect of not having gun control is the sizeable and growing number of deaths per year. The number of deaths in America involving guns have skyrocketed each year. In 2014, according to Gun Violence Archive, a website dedicated to gun statistics in the United States, “there were 12,556 gun deaths” (not including suicides). On top of that, “In 2017 that number grew to a whopping 15,588”.
A gun is made to be used at its full capability. Weapons are used also for protection over your family,(“A ban on assault weapons would not reduce crime”) also said, “ California 's murder rate increased every year for five years, twenty-six percent total. That is a perfect example of why some people feel the need to keep a gun or firearm in their homes, they are aware of the murder rate due to the media. People do not want to take a chance on someone hurting them so they feel the need to have one, witch is understandable because the murder rate has raised in the last 5 years there. You don’t want your firearm to not be able to be used to its maximum strength at a time if someone was to try to harm you, you would want it to be able to be used at its maximum strength to be able to protect you from harm.
Gun control has been a highly debated issue in the United States for decades, with both sides of the debate passionately advocating for their respective stances. While some argue that stricter gun control regulations are essential to reduce the rate of gun violence in the United States, others believe that the issue of gun violence is much more complex and that gun control is not the only solution. This essay will examine the issue of gun control in the United States, exploring the causes of gun violence, assessing the potential effectiveness of gun Gun control in the United States has been a contentious public policy issue for decades. According to AR Andrés and K Hempstead in their 2011 paper published in Health Policy, the Second Amendment
Gun control is a very popular subject in our society today. Citizens of our country do not feel safe considering the series of events that have happened in the last two decades. The term gun control is used to describe how firearms may be legally produced, sold, and used. There are laws made to regulate who may buy or own these firearms and provide requirements for registration, licensing, and carrying of concealed weapons. “While public safety is at the root of most federal, state, and local regulations, many people base their opposition to gun control on the language of the Second Amendment of the US Constitution.
Strict regulations and limitations have been pursued already and clearly do not suffice. Statics brought to attention by gun control opponents, show that gun control laws have done little to reduce crime rates. Several restrictions have been made on certain guns, considered as overly dangerous, though in the hands of an unstable criminal even a legal hunting gun can be deadly. Countless restrictions have been made, however people have still found ways around them. If people are unstable and determined enough, they will find a gun, regardless of the restrictions or regulations.
In today’s society, one of the most alienating issues in American politics is gun control. More specifically, the issue is whether or not guns should be banned in the United States. Some people would say that guns should be banned because it would reduce crime as a whole and keep citizens safer. These people, enthusiasts of stricter gun laws, fear being safe in their country where there are so many people who have access to guns. Opponents of this argument, however, also fear losing safety.
Gun Control in America Gun control in America is a highly debated subject. James Wilson speaks against gun control in his article “Gun Control Isn’t the Answer”. Gun laws need to be more restricted. Gun control reform is needed to safeguard children and prevent access to those with mental illness and a criminal background. Wilson talks about the shooting at Virginia Tech using it as a platform to talk about people not weapons being responsible for the tragedy.
Moorhouse, John C, and Brent Wanner. “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control?” Ebscohost, 1 Jan. 2006, web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/ pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=db378b8b-d9e7-4ee7-b26c-460bc1177bd4%40sessionmgr4008. Moorhouse and Wanner, in their article “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, studied whether or not gun control reduced gun violence in individual states. The overarching theme throughout the individual states is that gun control doesn’t reduce gun violence and is very ineffective.
Instead of banning or limiting guns, the evidence will show that removing the current restrictions and targeting individuals instead of guns will be a more effective process. The topic of gun control has two polarized opinions. One such opinion targets the individuals responsible for the crime, instead of just the weapons. John Moorhouse and Brent Wanner tackle the issue of gun control in their article “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, which was published in 2006 in the twenty-sixth volume of the Cato Journal. These researchers looked at the effects gun control laws had on violent crime and gun violence in the individual states.