The debate surrounding gun control and gun violence has been an ongoing controversy in many communities and America as a whole. As gun violence increase each year, views and opinions are rising, which not only have created tension in communities, but also has become a major debate in society. Although some critics argue that guns bring an overall negative impact to the country, others comment that guns are crucial to the beliefs and views of people today as well as important to their culture. In the context of today's society, many people in America are viewing gun control as an infringement of their rights and its threat towards their ability to protect, thus questioning: To what extent should gun use and possession should be controlled? …show more content…
As these restrictions and laws on gun possession are uplifted, the culture in Texas begins to change as well, resulting in more and more people carrying guns out in the open. In addition to the increase of guns, the people in Texas have grown accustomed to the everyday life occurrence of these guns in their community so much so that it have blended into the society’s culture. This change in culture is evident in Manny Fernandez and Dave Montgomery research as they present tons of reliable data and perspectives to support it. Their credibility also comes from the New York Times, a well known newspaper company that have multiple articles in this topic. Also, each of the authors has written many articles related to gun control and gun violence, thus gaining enormous expertise in this field. Their work and research provide reliable, valuable and yet unbiased insights on both the impact guns can impose on the society and, at the same time, show how gun control can positively influence the social aspect and culture of a society as …show more content…
In the article, “The Impact of Violence on Children,” Joy Osofsky elaborates that gun violence in communities are extremely detrimental in communities especially for children. Osofsky, a professor of public health in Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, uses masses of children psychology, scenarios and experiences to demonstrate the importance of gun control and to increase gun regulations. She focuses on children’s response to guns and violence, showing that the exposure of gun violence to children at their early ages not only increases their interest to use guns, but also the likelihood to use it to resolve conflicts or when a problem arises. As this continues, children can also experience stress, thus struggling to regulate their emotions and their experiences of the occurrence of many gun violence. These exposures will manifest in the child’s growth and he or she will end up being a more aggressive and violent individual later on. Additionally, guns can have a socially and culturally impact within communities too. Osofsky also explains that these fears of guns are a direct impact due to the exposures to gun violence that causes people to have a variety of psychological challenges and furthermore creates a snowball effect of violence and aggression. As violence increases in a community, the author explains that it will
The book talks about the history of gun control and focuses on debates from a dozen of distinguished specialist from around the world. It examined the Second Amendment and political climate surrounding laws that can impact the issue with gun violence. It focuses on exploring the problem with gun control from both the prospective of law enforcements and the public. The second source is a website "Gun Control Facts." By James D. Agresti and Reid K. Smith.
People say it is not the guns; it is the people-, tremendously true, but guns do actually play a factor, they are the tool people use in the mass shootings, the United States has the highest gun owner rate and the highest mass shooting rate; the article written by Emma Gonzalez, “Famous Speeches: “We Call BS,” Emma Gonzalez Speech To Gun Activists”, and another article written by Bloomberg, “Issue Overload: Guns in America”. These two articles differentiate in multiple contrasting ways but are also similar in many different ways, the way the articles perspectives are written and the goals of the articles. The article by Emma Gonzalez and the passage written by Bloomberg compare to each other in numerous ways. The two articles similarities
Gun violence is a constant problem in the United States of America. It has affected society and out youth negatively in the past and will continue to affect the country as a whole if nothing is done about it. The country is in mourning due to the recent influx of gun violence related crimes. There are common-sense reforms that either side can agree on. These include improvements to backgrounds checks, revisions of the Second Amendment that accommodate the modern innovations to firearms and reinstating the Center for Disease Control's research on gun violence.
While opposers of gun control legislation believe that an increase in possession of guns reduce crimes and violence, statistics have revealed a strikingly positive correlation between possession of guns and violent crimes. The U.S. may only have 4.4% of the world’s population, but it has 42% of all civilian owned guns (Kodjack). There is a gun for almost every citizen, with “approximately 300 million firearms held by citizens in their homes” (Kodjak). These statistics have created great suspicion about the reliability of legislative regulations in restricting the citizens’ ability to obtain firearms, and reducing gun violence. Critics of the NRA’s activities have identified loopholes, or ways to illegally get by, certain gun laws.
Moreover, the first source that will be synthesized in this essay includes the article titled "Gun Control" which comes from the Gale online database, highlights several events that has taken place in the United States that raised the question of controlling guns. Some examples of such events can be found around the first line of this introductory paragraph. The second that will be synthesized into this essay is an article in a Tseh 2 scholarly journal titled, "Making Guns Safer" by Stephen P. Teret et al. The focus of thus source is about how personalizing weapons can effectively prevent gun-related accidents, injuries, and reduce the likelihood of teenage suicides in both children adults. Lastly, the last source that will be synthesize into essay is another article from the same database as the first source and second sources titled, "Is Gun Control the Answer to Mass Shootings?"
Combined with cultural method, we will consider the “culture of fear” and the feelings that justify gun ownership. We will analyze whether this fear leads to more people obtaining guns and ultimately committing horrendous acts of murder. This analysis will provide greater understanding into the influence that the media and society have on this
For others, a view that has arose later, guns are the “perpetuation of illicit social hierarchies, the elevation of force over reason,” and a promoter of collectivity and remover of individuality. This latter view of guns is a direct application of the conflict theory. For those who hold this view, and likely support the passage of gun control laws, guns are representative of social inequality that is abundant in modern society, that the usage of guns is a means of violently coercing those of lower classes to remain in their class. The view of guns as a symbol of protection is also an application of the conflict theory.
The issue of gun violence has plagued the United States for years. Recently, gun violence has risen even higher than in the past. Mass shootings have increased, and more people have been killed in shootings than ever before. The debate over the need for stricter gun control laws has been a hot topic of discussion for a long time.
The cultural aspects of a society have always had an exceptional impact in the way the population functions. Where an individual lives will determine the state of mind he/she will have when approached with many situations that include, amongst many others, forms of expression, medicinal approaches, disciplinary techniques, and even violence within the society. The United States is a powerful country with a culture largely and unknowingly aimed towards violence. As a result, citizens feel unsafe and politicians are looking for solutions to this rising problem. The most common debate throughout the nation is that of gun control and whether or not guns are actually to blame for the decrease in public safety.
This week in, las vegas nevada, there was a mass shooting that left 59 people dead. Due to these recent , and horrible, events we are now forced to talk about a topic that has been extremely controversial in our country for some time now, gun control. I am here to talk about my opinion on gun control, how it could fail if not done properly and how the incident in las vegas is affecting our society. You see it in the recent headlines everywhere now “ LAS VEGAS MASSACRE: WHY WE NEED GUN CONTROL”. There's constant bashing towards those who lean to the right of the political spectrum, such as myself , for disliking the concept of gun control.
In today’s society, one of the most alienating issues in American politics is gun control. More specifically, the issue is whether or not guns should be banned in the United States. Some people would say that guns should be banned because it would reduce crime as a whole and keep citizens safer. These people, enthusiasts of stricter gun laws, fear being safe in their country where there are so many people who have access to guns. Opponents of this argument, however, also fear losing safety.
The use of and the owning of guns is a very hot and debated topic in society today. For many, this is a life and death debate due to the recent and numerous school shootings. These school shootings have caused an outcry for more gun control, specifically in relation to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Despite these calls, increased gun control is not the answer. Most gun owners’ use their guns responsibly and for good purposes.
There is an estimation that about half of the households in the United States owns at least one gun. As such many people can have access to guns, including children and other family members. Many school based attacks involve young people carrying guns owned by their parents and going on a rage through schools and other places. Similarly, the ease of acquiring guns has led to vulnerable deaths of people across the country. Moreover, this leads obsessed people to escape their frustrations on minorities by murdering and threatening them.
Additionally, the financial impacts of weapon viciousness all through the United States has taken an incredible toll upon the American economy. Because of America 's industrialist economic framework connection to the Second Amendment, the US government has not prohibited the sale and maintenance of gun weaponry. In spite of the fact that the assembling and exchange of firearms creates benefit for American industries, the harms made by these weapons are inequitable for tax paying citizens. In numerous areas across the United States, individuals live in dread of getting shot because of the absence of laws applying to the suitable use of guns. In these towns and cities the dread of getting shot is very discerning because of past encounters, for example, the mass shooting in an Arizona movie theatre or on the Virginia Tech campus.
Web. Webster, Daniel W, and Jon S. Vernick. Reducing Gun Violence in America: Informing Policy with Evidence and Analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013. Web Webster, Daniel, W., Vernick, Jon, S., Vittes, Katherine, McGinty, Emma, E., Teret, Stephen, P. And Frattaroli, Shannon.