Would it be effective to arm teachers in a school and is it possible it would reduce the chance of a school shooting such as Columbine? Arming a teacher may increase the response time for an emergency in a rural school district and would be able to provide safety. Although it can provide safety, it may be still possible that allowing teachers to hold a weapon in school grounds will also cause many risks and be very dangerous to the students or faculty in a school. In an arming teachers program, the teacher will go through 35 hours of training and will be able to maintain five classroom hours a day to gain the knowledge of holding a weapon and be certified. A teacher will be selected and unknown to others in a school district to maintain safety to their identity and safety to the students in the classroom. It can affect society by making it much more safe in a school environment and lower the risks of a tragic event like Columbine. …show more content…
This can alter many factors and perspectives of teachers and students in the school. An example of which is possibly viewing the teacher as an adult with the advantage of a handheld weapon. The teacher can use the weapon to its advantage and abuse many students or threaten them by flashing the weapon. There is many reasons why a teacher shouldn’t hold a weapon and there are many factors that should be considered before this becomes a law in each school district. Many districts in other states are allowing teachers to carry a weapon. Arming teachers is a critical debate that can be explained through Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and my own personal view of the
Teachers can protect students, other staff members, and themselves rather than being unable to do anything 4. Teacher armament is less expensive than hiring trained professionals 5. Teacher armament will decrease incidents of school shootings, and set a declining trend for any violent crimes happening on school
I foresee both, advantages and disadvantages, about arming school staff members. I believe that this could be part of a solution for some smaller and rural school that cannot afford armed security or have limited access to law enforcement. I also believe that something is better than nothing because the sooner we can stop this event, the less citizens that are harmed. Law enforcement has focused heavily on advance training and preparing for these attacks since the Columbine incident in 1999. Over the past 19 years law enforcement continues to evaluate the tactics and mindset of the active shooters.
Arming teachers would be a bad thing because It will cost a mass amount of money, the teachers will need a great deal of training, and guns make the school environment very menacing and very uncomfortable. Arming teachers will cost a heap of money because there are a lot schools in the USA.Donald Lee Sheppard wrote this sentence in his article “My Daughter is a teacher, not a security guard “There are more than
It could even also put others at risk. Teachers should not be armed because their job is to enlighten and teach but shouldn’t have to feel they have to take a bullet their students. Teachers go into teaching guiding children to develop skills and to think critically to be successful later in life. They get to shape our future world by showing the children how to be role models and how to be ethical. The first reasoning that makes this a hazardous choice is that majority of teachers aren't trained in shooting a gun or even know how to pull a trigger.
Teachers should not be armed in schools because the could not handle a real situation, and the liability is too much of a risk. To elaborate, it is widely agreed that a student’s well-being is a teacher’s concern. For six to eight hours every day for 5 days a week, the life of the student is in the teacher’s hands. However, a teacher has never been expected to arm themself to protect a student until now.
Violent criminals know that currently schools are gun free zones, and can use this factor to their advantage. Rather than falling victim to an attack on the school; teachers could protect themselves and their students. Students could feel much safer if their teacher was armed. Students would feel more safe if they knew they could be protected from an attack from an intruder or another student. Criminals know that teachers currently are not armed and could potentially see schools as a target.
There have been many security measures done in schools to make them safer. From keeping the doors locked, hiring security guards, to installing metal detectors, schools have made many precautions to keep their students as safe as possible. Having teachers carry guns has been a newer idea to solving school shootings and it has brought up a lot of negative talk amongst Americans. Having teachers carry guns is not an effective way to protect schools because it negatively affects the teachers, parents, and the students. Arming teachers is not the answer to this issue because not all teachers will want to carry a gun and they will not have the skills to, which will prevent them from being the best teacher they can be, and arming teachers will also cost a ton of money, causing the
There is a possibility that a kid who is planning a shooting could just be in a classroom and find out were his/her teacher keeps the weapon, and they wouldn 't even have to sneak a gun in. That’s a downside but what if we made gun safes that only opened with a teachers ID or own password making it almost impossible for a student to open it. Conclusion By arming teachers there are alot more positives than negatives, Yes bad things can happen with a deadly weapon in a classroom but people will continue to do these horrific crimes knowing there is hardly anything that’s going to stop them.
Over the past few weeks, arming teachers has been a controversial topic throughout the country. School shootings have taken the lives of many over the past few years, yet they are becoming more and more frequent. In today’s society children shouldn’t have to go to school worried if they are going to be safe that day. If teachers are armed it will add that extra bit of protection to the children. A big question is if arming teachers is even going to matter if an active shooter happens to be in that school.
This solution, like most things, has it pros and cons. Arming teachers sounds extreme but with this past shooting that happened and all the threats schools have received, we’re reaching the point in society where we need teachers to be armed. If 80% of the teachers and maybe even some staff were armed, do you really think a shooter would walk into a school where the amount of guns they have is outnumbered by lots of other guns? Even if the shooter did decide to walk into an armed school, they would lose because it would be them against a whole group of armed staff. Not only does the school and its students safety benefit from this idea, but teachers benefit from it financially.
It’s better to not leave it all up to chance and to stick with the public service of law enforcement, certified protectors, who can truly handle the job. The fight or flight situation, also known as hyperarousal, is a very detrimental affect to authorizing teachers to have firearms. It is a reflex, the go-to response in a stressful situation. And, what can be more stressful than a school shooting or having to shoot someone yourself? In this, giving teachers this responsibility, there is always the
Thinking protectively, some schools allow teachers to have guns in the classroom. Though they have good intent, this is an extremely terrible thing to do. There are many risks that come into play when this is allowed. Injury can be caused because of these deadly weapons being present in schools.
There negatives for teachers having guns at school include: students getting the gun, extensive training for the teachers - which would cost money, students frightened to learn, and what would happen if the approved teacher with the gun is not there. There should be no need for teachers to
It says that a teacher who is qualified to have a gun could end an attack quickly. At our school, only the teachers who feel comfortable and are qualified should have a weapon at our school. All teachers who carry guns would need to take a concealed carry class and practice on a monthly basis. Teachers should make a plan that will help protect their students until first responders arrive. Students should not know which teacher carries guns because an unstable person could take their gun.
Guns on campuses make the vulnerable even more vulnerable. Even though having guns on campus would improve response time, having guns on campus would also increases the chances of a confrontation escalating and turning lethal. Keywords: (guns, violence, schools) It’s very disheartening how easily it is to obtain a certification to own a gun. Here in the United States it is easier to get a permit to carry a concealed weapon than it is to obtain a driver’s license.