An Enforcer inquiry was conducted to determine if any members of the 110 Detective Squad ran the name "Shawn Thomas" from 2100 hours on 06/08/2015 - 2100 hours on 06/09/2015. The Enforcer Check revealed that two (2) members of the 110 Squad ran the name "Shawn Thomas", Det. Kelly and Det. Patel (formerly assigned to the 110th Squad). These two officers were subsequently added to this case as subjects with the allegation of DRV-Other for failure to take appropriate actio n in regards to an active I-Card. A YouTube inquiry was conducted for "Unlawfully Arrested for Failure to Provide Identification". The search revealed a video posted by "Shawn Thomas". In the video you see a male white Sergeant with brown hair, dressed in plain clothes, and a male white Police Officer with blond hair, in uniform. No third officer is seen. No shield numbers or name plates where visible in the video. Additionally, the complainant is not seen in the video, you can only hear his voice. No violations of Department rules or procedures are observed in the video. Conferrals Conducted: A conferral with IAB Intelligence Unit disclosed no information on the subject officers or the allegations. A conferral was made with the Kings …show more content…
After discussing the facts of this case, it was determined that Schedule "B" Command Disciplines will be requested for Det. Kelly, and Det. Patel. Det. Kelly and Det. Patel failed to take appropriate police action in regards to the active I-Card, which is in violation of P.G. 203-10 "Public Contact - Prohibited Conduct", page #1, paragraph #5, which states that MOS are prohibited from engaging in conduct prejudicial to good order, efficiency, or discipline of the Department. Charges and Specifications were subsequently preferred against Det. Patel, ICIS# 16-40506, after he opted to not accept his Schedule "B" Command Discipline with a penalty of arned and Admonished, without a statutory
The complainant, Mr. Shawn Thomas, known to the Department under NYSID# 05036218Z, who resides at 130 Pelham Road New Rochelle NY 10805, was interviewed by investigators. Mr. Thomas stated that he had $150.00 inside of his camera bag. The last time he saw his camera bag was when he was inside of his cell and saw the subject officer, PO Miroshnyk, searching it on the desk. He did not see the officer remove any money while he was searching his bag. He received $5000.00 in cash as a donation from Deborah Goodman.
• P alleges excessive force and false arrest. P claims he was at his former girlfriend’s apartment when two MOS arrested. P claims that he was placed in RMP and taken to PSA 6 precinct. P claims that at the precinct several MOS assaulted him causing him to lose vision in one eye. MOS Carlos Sierra was not present at the precinct for the incident.
Of the 16 case reviewed, only 2 had errors. One derivative CR case did not have information about the principal alien; however, Officer Ingleby interviewed both together, so he knew that the CR6 was approved before the CR7. The other noted error was with a Refugee case admission date was not properly backdated with ICMS processing. These types of errors can have a far reaching effect if the proper admission data are not noted properly.
10 Investigative Skills (7PA0006337) - Officer Stark responded to a PC211-Robbery radio call at 1038 E. Colorado Blvd. The comments of the call stated 2 Female Asians and 2 Male Asians pushed the Victim out of his wheelchair and took his wallet containing $25. Stark responded to the location, even though it was out of his beat, and asked me if he could handle the call. I advised the beat Officer that we would handle the incident for training. As we entered the Rite Aid, the Victim was sitting in his wheelchair directly in front of the exit.
INTRODUCTION: This case involves the arrest of the suspect for possession of an open container of alcohol in public, in violation of PMC 9.24.030. The suspect was cited out. INVESTIGATION: On 01-12-16 at 0836 hours, I was working uniformed patrol with Officer Cass #2067.
The employees were sanctioned for the underlying charges and the charge of giving the false statements. Holding of the Court: The court ruled in favor of La Chance because agencies
So, officer Sultemeier and I ended our search and made our way to the Recreation yard to find inmates CORPUS, CAITLYN DIANE #6904 MELUGIN, AMBER LYNN #7077 arguing. We then separated the two inmates and pulled out MELUGIN, AMBER LYNN and talked to her about why were they were fighting. MELUGIN, AMBER LYNN stated that “CORPUS, CAITLYN DIANE #6904 is picking on VANN, RACHAEL MICHELE #6737 and how if they were on the streets somebody would’ve checked that bitch”. I officer Zagada then felt the need to remove MELUGIN, AMBER LYNN
At approx 1:15 pm ON 8-29-16, I was sitting at my desk in my office with the door closed. I heard the raised voice of someone I didn 't recognize yelling repeatedly, "get your hands off me" and similar variations of the demand. I did not hear any other voices. I then opened the door and left my office to find Ofc Jaques searching a male black subject who was now found to be the source of the yelling. Ofc Jaques could be heard sternly but calmly giving orders for the subject to comply with his orders in order to be searched prior to being held in the nearby cell.
Both officers were placed on paid administrative leave and the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) will run the investigation on Ringgenberg and Schwarze.
For my research on how the contextual themes concepts can result in criminal justice malfeasance I selected the case of State v. Steele, 138 Ohio St.3d 1, 2013-Ohio-2470. This case involved police officer Julian Steele of the Cincinnati, Ohio police department and his indictment on ten counts of police misconduct, including abduction, intimidation, extortion, rape, and sexual battery. Officer Steele abused his legal power to interrogate, arrest and detain a witness by knowingly filing a materially false complaint in order to influence or intimidate a witness; and abducting her minor child from school with the intent of charging the minor child with a robbery felony ” (State v. Steele, 138 Ohio St.3d 1, 2013-Ohio-2470). Due to the nature of this case and its involvement of the minor children involved, the court documents refer to the subjects by initials only.
During the 2014 evaluation cycle Det. Thomas developed a strained relationship with some patrol officers, as he included irrelevant material in reports, in a manner to shine light on other officer’s deficiencies. He was instructed not to utilize narratives in that manner but document in memo form and advise. I was also provided information from the prosecutor’s office that they did not like Thomas’s approach with them in reference to warrants, or prosecution of cases, and the feeling as though he was trying to tell them how to do their job. It was then requested that all requests come from me in the communication process as they did not feel as though they would receive cooperation from Thomas.
About 12 police officers were injured when trying to rein in the crowd. The police has said it will not release the video footage of body cams on the police officers who were present on the scene, until the investigation is complete. The police video footage, without close-up, was shown to Scott 's family who could not discern what, if anything, was
On 02/08/2017, I, William Van Scoter, was working as a police officer for the Wichita State University Police Department, in Wichita, Sedgwick County, Kansas. At approximately 1520 hours I was told to interview a woman who was to believed to have been sexually assaulted. I arrived at the University Police Department's lobby and was met by a female and two males. The female was later identified as Terry Giang. Giang was going to be interview by Detective Jeff Rider
Your case would be great if you had a body camera, but your department does not issue body cameras. Now, people are second guessing everything you have done. Unfortunately, this kind of thing has been happening all across our country. With all the advances in technology, people are starting to video police more and more every day.
It is becoming more important for law enforcement officers (LEOs) to have video recordings of civilian contacts recorded from their own perspectives. Many times critical incidents happen out of range of the vehicle cameras. Just like most things in life, technology has found a way to make advancements in everything we do. Advancements in law enforcement are of no exception. Technology has put cameras in squad cars and now on our officers, but unlike vehicle-mounted cameras, the body-worn cameras travel with officers.