24% out of 55.5% of high school students are kicked off of sports teams every due to them having bad grades. That is not the only thing, last year high schools had it that you had to have a D letter grade average to play sports they then boosted it up so that you have to have a C letter grade average to participate in sports. But then you realize that the grades that sports players get are not that good after all. Most high school sports players get are kept on the team barely holding on with grades like C’s and D’s. Therefore, I think that students that have bad grades should not be able to play sports with bad grades and that all school should go by the No Pass No Play Rule. The first reason that students should not play sports with bad grades is that if they were allowed to continue playing with bad grades they would keep those bad grades not caring for their other classes, and they would continue to do poorly. But with the No Pass No Play rule, they would care about their other classes. This changes because the No Pass No Play rule makes it so that students can not play sports if they have grades, for example, a D average has to be risen to a C average to start playing the sport again. If a student fails even one of their classes they are kicked off whatever sports team that they …show more content…
The other percent of students that don’t get the athletic scholarship have to go out and find a job which is hard because of the grades they have had in high school not a lot of people are going to not hire them. This shows why the No Pass No Play rule works so well to make it so they can get good grades and find a good job if they do not get an athletic
Amanda Ripley, the author of “The Case Against High-School Sports”, made many good points that can create much controversy when it comes to high-school sports, due to the cost and the academic problems it may be creating amongst the students. She interviewed many people who have experiences banning high-school in order to save money for their school district and the school itself. Ripley wants to bring into attention all the money that is used on high-school sports when districts tend to use a minimal amount on academics. I have come to an agreement with her point-of-views due to several reasons: sports are the main focus of any high-school that may have sports, the tax money being provided to the school district has been used on sports than
High school sports are valued around the United States. They can be a big part of school spirit, and may even affect the school you choose to go to. Two articles: one from The Atlantic, and one from The Huffington Post have conflicting opinions on the subject of high school sports. The article against sports by Amanda Ripley, was written to persuade US citizens that sports should be limited or fully removed from high schools. The article in support of sports by Kai Sato was written in response to the negative article, intended to critique that author in specific.
When high schools eliminate their high school football teams, they are protecting what they stand for: education first. In order for a student to be part of the football team, he needs to be academically eligible. Even with this limit, many athletes are not college ready. Some high schools are lowering the GPA requirement to participate in sports. They are lowering their academic standards for sports, something that their students most likely will not use in their adult
Courtney Stawarz says, “Sports are important, I understand that. However, Elizabeth Kolbert has a valid argument.” She says, while Americans tend to put more emphasis on sports rather than learning, it is not the children that are at fault. She sees how sports are related to grades being you have to make sure you are eligible to play. Children have to watch their grades in order to be able to play sports in schools.
The players have to have a certain grade point average it makes kids get the grades they might work harder and get the grades the students might otherwise not get. Also it helps kids come together, study together and sometimes even make there own homework club. Like when it was football season for our team for our team we would go into our coaches room and do our homework together. What’s so bad about football it's fun it makes money for schools, and it makes the students get good grades, why are the people who aren’t playing the sport like the principal deciding?
The risk that High School athletes are put at when they step out on the field or court may have gotten too far. High school athletes are put at risk the second they pick up that jersey or even sign up for a certain sports team. Student athletes are not just put at risk by physical injuries they also suffer from mental health conditions and disorders. Studies have shown that 15%-21% of high school athletes suffer from depression which is double the rate of American adults and 22% of male and female athletes suffer from mental health conditions. These athletes do these things on a daily basis so they deserve to earn income from their performance.
High School Sports Should be Funded Every year 300,000 students are participating in sports (Gould 1). The School District has been funding the athletics program, which has been benefiting many of the students’ lives for several years. The discontinuation of high school sports will cause many students to loose the health, social and educational benefits provided by participating in athletics. The School District should continue to fund sports because they benefit students.
Is it time to get rid of the American tradition of school sports? In the article, “Yes, It’s Time to Scale Back” the author Amanda Ripley expresses how sports are harmful to the students and school funds. However, in the article, “No Sports Are More Important than Ever” by Tim O’ Shei discusses how school sports benefit students. The article, “10 Reasons Why High School Sports Benefit Students” by Grace Chen also backs up why school sports are important. School sports are a reason for failing grades; on the other hand, there are many positive benefits to having them in schools.
In a New York Times article titled “Why Student Athletes Continue to Fail”, published in April 2015 by Daniel Openheimer, it says that universities like UNC that are part of the NCAA offer classes for athletes that are “no show” classes, where no work is required but they are given good grades. This is not just at UNC but many division one schools are allowing this to happen, as well as breaking academic ineligibility rules, and committing other types of academic fraud. If this is happening, then after their athletic careers are over, their education is invalidated. Oppenheimer also goes on to describe a survey taken where student athletes inwardly rank academics as more important than sports, but they all believe that their teammates hold sports to be more important. Thus, an ironic cycle of peer pressure is formed.
College athletes are required to keep up with a certain GPA and have to take so many credits each semester to be eligible to play that particular sport. The athletes are being pushed more than a student that isn’t in a sport. Students who aren’t in a sport don’t have to worry as much about making sure their grades are constantly up and staying eligible for something. If the player is not keeping up with that end of the deal than they can suffer the consequences like not being able to play a certain amount of games or even being kicked off the team. These athletes have a lot at stake when they go to
Did you know that depending on the sport, students who play sports in college most likely have less than a 2% chance of becoming professional athletes? At middle schools, high schools and colleges across the country, everyone is arguing over whether or not students with failing grades should be allowed to play sports. In my opinion, a good education is so very important for our country’s youth, especially the athletes. Not a lot of kids are good enough to play in the top college sports programs in the country. But even those who are, still have an astonishingly low chance at making the professional leagues.
If you have ever been in sports or school athletics, act fast! Schools are getting rid of their sports and we need to stop it. “Being a student is harder than ever. You are being held to tougher academic standards-and so is your school.
The No Pass, No Play rule requires students to acquire excellent grades to play sports. Children in the same situation as Frances could be discouraged to try in school or even drop out of school. Sports may seem alarming at first glance, but digging deeper, it is present that sports aid children in their present and future endeavors. Not everyone lives the same lives.
This is one of the retractors ideas that people in disagreement with these programs have. And they are right. Technically, sports are not an official subject in colleges. People think that collage sports compromise the rest of the students. One of the requirements of these sports programs is getting good grades during the course of their education.
From the Friday night lights to the last second goal, school sports are a major part of the high school journey. In fact, according to "Are High School Sports Good For Kids?" by Daniel Gould, Ph.D., over five million students from the United States participate in a school sport. High school sports are a great way for student-athletes to stay healthy, make new friends, and be a part of a team atmosphere. In addition, school sports keep kids off of the streets and lower the athlete's chance of committing a crime. School sports are a tremendous way for student-athletes to create new, meaningful relationships.