Power is the ability to influence others and shape events. It can be measured through various metrics such as economic strength, military might, technological advancement, political clout, cultural influence and diplomatic relations. In the international arena, power can be exercised through economic sanctions, military intervention, diplomatic negotiations and international organizations. Each of these strategies have their own advantages and drawbacks that must be considered when exercising power on a global scale. Power is a fundamental concept in international relations. It is the ability of one state or actor to influence the behavior of another through various means such as economic, military, and political pressure.
The use of power
…show more content…
It declared that the United States would not interfere with existing European colonies, or any other affairs of European powers. The Roosevelt Corollary was an addition to the Monroe Doctrine issued by President Theodore Roosevelt in 1904, which declared that the US had the right to intervene in Latin American countries if necessary to protect its interests. Both of these doctrines still shape US foreign policy today. The Monroe Doctrine and its Roosevelt Corollary were two of the most prominent early objectives of United States relations with Latin American countries. The Monroe Doctrine, declared that the US would not interfere with existing European colonies in Latin America or allow any new colonization efforts. This was meant to prevent further European intervention in the region and establish US hegemony in the Americas. The Roosevelt Corollary, stated that the US had the right to intervene militarily in any country deemed to be destabilizing for regional security. Together these two objectives aimed to protect US interests and promote economic stability throughout the …show more content…
Nonetheless, it is widely acknowledged that economic concerns, notably the desire to increase US commercial and financial interests in the area, played a larger role in defining US policy toward Latin America during this period. The United States considered South America as a key supply of raw commodities such as rubber, copper and oil required for the expansion of American industry. Furthermore, Latin America offered a large market for US goods, and politicians in the United States thought that boosting trade with the area would improve the US
The Monroe Doctrine was created and claimed that it was to protect all Latin American Countries from European intervention. The Monroe Doctrine was not designed to protect the Latin American countries from European intervention but for the benefits that came with creating it. The men who created the document were all interested in the presidential election. They wanted to have as many people as possible to be in their favor so they could win the election. For example, Adams was the only candidate who was not a slaveholder.
The Monroe Doctrine was an expression of nationalism as it declared the United States’s intention to stay out of European affairs and it forced Europe to not interfere in the Americas. Firstly, the United States declared it would stay out of European affairs, wars, and conflicts, signaling an inward focus. However, the United States also threatened Europe when it declared it would go to war in case any European nation attempted further colonization or interference in the Western hemisphere. Metaphorically speaking, the US built a wall between the Americas and Europe, impeding any military or political interference. Even though the US did not have the power to enforce this at the time, it was carving its path to dominate nations in Latin America
The Monroe doctrine was articulated during the period when there was the need for democracy. It was drafted by the then Secretary of State John Quincy Adams, and his primary reason was to end colonization and promote democracy. He feared that Spain could rise as a superpower and reign over united states' colonies. President James Monroe later implemented the Monroe doctrine. In the Monroe Doctrine, Adams indicated that there would be no new colonization in the new world and that countries would have democracy and freedom to rule themselves.
Roosevelt noticed that if nations in the Western Hemisphere continued to have persistent problems, such as the failure to repay foreign debt, they would become targets of European invention. To sustain and uphold regional stability, Roosevelt drafted his corollary: the United States would intervene in any Latin American country that demonstrated severe economic problems. The corollary reported that the United States would server as the “patrolman” of the Western Hemisphere, which would later create much bitterness in Latin
This means that America thought of itself as the greatest power, therefore pushing this power onto other countries. Roosevelt also has a sense of moral imperialism and pushed the boundaries of the federal government when he added onto the Monroe Doctrine the Roosevelt Corollary. The Roosevelt Corollary not only maintained the prohibition of European colonization of Latin American countries, but also stated that the United States had the power to intervene in those countries’ affairs in order to preserve democracy and order. This expansion of Monroe’s past policies demonstrates the undeniable continuity between the two presidentsn and how the role of the president expanded throughout
Therefore, after two years of development, President James Monroe gave a speech to Congress in 1823 regarding the idea of establishing a solution to Adams exigence to form a foreign policy by creating the Monroe Doctrine. This policy stressed a noncompliant attitude from America towards European nations to not colonialize in the Western Hemisphere or else face retaliation. The United States declared to Europe and other foreign nations through this doctrine that they “will consider any attempt on their part to extend their system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety" of the United States (Monroe). This doctrine did not affect the already established colonies of European powers that had declared their independence from America. It claimed that the United States would not interfere with European affairs and stay neutral as long as Europe followed the policy of halting western colonization.
The Monroe Doctrine Continuation and Change on the U.S. Foreign Policy After decades of expansion, John Quincy Adams thought the United States should have dominance over the whole western hemisphere. Spain, though, had quite different ideas. They wanted to reestablish control over all their colonies in South America, Mexico, and Texas. Through fear of their colonies revolutionizing, Spain and other European countries created the "Holy Alliance", aimed at preventing revolutions in the name of Christian and monarchist principles. Because Britain's trade with these colonies would greatly suffer due to Spanish restrictions, they refused to join the Holy Alliance.
Throughout history, we have seen nations across the world have governments wielding varying degrees of power. Some are good uses and some are abusive and unjust. Unfair power has existed during the American Revolution from 1607 and up until 1783 when the Americans took back their country and claimed what was rightfully theirs. The enduring issue of power can be defined as the ability to influence or control behavior of people. War is used to gain power, something England wanted to have over the American colonists.
The meaning of power is the capacity or the ability to direct or influence the behavior
The Monroe Doctrine was a speech given in 1823 by James Monroe, the 5th president of the United States, to the U.S. Congress concerning European presence in the Western Hemisphere. Monroe was becoming continuously concerned about European influence in the region. While the primary audience for this message was Congress, the intended audience was all European powers, including Russia, and Latin America. The events in Latin America before and after the Spanish-American War will be used as an example of the imperial reach by the U.S. The United States, ironically, became an imperial power through its mission outlined in the Monroe Doctrine to end European colonialism and imperialism.
But first what is Power? When researching Power words such as authority, control, direct, command and influence all appear. These words all support the following statement “Power is the ability to influence and control the behaviour of others.” The problem with power is that it often leads to those in power abusing it. As Lord Acton famously quoted “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
Power, a major influence throughout all of history. Wars, love, and countries all began with the same concept: power. Sometimes, power is used responsibly; other time the platform of prestige authority is used in a manipulative way. Power can stem from an individual, but it can also be rooted in memories that haunt people forever. In The Kite Runner, Khaled Hosseini writes an impactful novel, showing the brutality Afghanistan goes through as power is corrupted in the country.
Power is the ability or capacity to do something or act in a particular way, Power is not only strength it is a human relationships, power is the authority one person holds over another. In the play The Crucible,written by Arthur Miller. Three characters Abigail Williams, Reverend Hale, and Judge Danforth. All want to gain power as the play goes on. But it takes a turn and influenced them negatively.
Power as conceptualized by critical theorists. Power is one of the words that holds great effect. It is defined by Webster (2015) as “the ability to control people or things; a person or organization that has a lot of control and influence over other people or organizations”. In general, a person or organization that holds power has authority over others. Thus, power is conceptualized in the organizational communication by critical theorists.
(ii) Power and Conflict: The capacity the one person has the influence over the other persons such that other persons act in accordance with his/her wishes can be defined as ‘Power’. Conflicts could be both positive and negative. Good conflicts could be encouraged but bad conflicts ought to be prevented.