Since the beginning of American history, conflicts have arose between the North and the South between the varied people that inhabited the land. Clashing viewpoints were common between people and the military, large and small states, and between free and slave states during the civil war. The Civil War was fought from 1861 to 1865, it was fought within the United States and was the North versus the South. The cause was rooted on the discussion of slavery, but also on sectionalism between the North and South. Sectionalism can be defined as when a group restricts their interests to a narrow sphere without concern for the general well-being of other groups. Such as the North South relationship. Although some believe slavery to be the major cause …show more content…
In the North the economy consisted of industrial machines and factories used to produce goods. Railroads were also used for fast communication and trade, and immigrants came to work at these factories, which led to cheaper labor. In the South it was much more of a rural based society that included a lot of farming and agriculture. Crops were relied on heavily as a form of profit. The rivers were what the South used to transport good, and as a result led to slow communication. Also the South used slaves for free labor, and did not have many immigrant workers at all. The economies of both the North and the South were fueled by many different classes of people. In the North, the middle class and lower class workers often did the manufacturing. While in the South indentured servants would work on plantations to grow tobacco, indigo, and cotton which were all very labor intensive. Once these people got out of servitude they would seek to farm the land themselves but often would not have the means to do so which led to a poor class of people who could not even afford slaves. These poor people made up an ample amount of the population. The poor class of the South obviously was unable to afford a plantation or slaves for that matter. Consequently, it can be implied that did not have a very large impact on their will to fight in the Civil War. Farmers were the next class of people, they owned small patches of land, never large enough to be a plantation. These farmers supported at most one slave who were usually treated more as workers than property. Finally, the large plantation owners were the final class of the South, they were able to own hundreds of slaves and some would treat them harshly. In spite of this, these people made up a very tiny portion of the population. Therefore, they would need to use their
In the north, the economy was very diverse. There were manufacturing jobs as well as agricultural jobs. Factories in the north could be seen manufacturing textiles, guns, and many other products that can be internally traded. Unlike southerners, northerners supported the construction of railroads to move their products across the U.S. Southerners had already been using water systems to move their crops and had no desire to change. Free labor and immigrants fueled their economy.
Between 1800 and 1850, the North and South had grown distinctively different but they also had some similarities. Some of the differences & similarities between the North and South included the economy, social attitudes & structures, and daily life. The North and the South had differences & similarities with their economies. The North and the South had farmers and everyone including children worked on the family farms. As time went by, the North became more industrialized and manufacturing became the center point of their economy not agriculture.
American war and economics have a long history together from the over taxation during the revolutionary war to WWII’s munitions manufacturing and railroad boom, economics played a role in almost every American war, including the Civil War. The Civil War tore the nation apart, pitching brother against brother, North versus South over the critical issue of slavery. Despite excellent military strategy and battle ethics that the South possessed, it was ultimately the North’s economic superiority that won the war. This is observed in the fact that cotton is not king, Northern industry and capitalism faced off against Southern agriculture and socialism, and the power of railroads.
Instead on relying on free labor they were able to boost their economy because of their cash crop production. Overall with their cash crops such as tobacco and mainly king cotton they would be making significantly less money but yet still able to partially thrive even after losing slaves. “The cotton production system relied on a rigid system of class, which was based upon the concept of race (Civil War Politics and Racism)”. After slavery was abolished the south earned 40% of the income of the north compared to 70% of the income of the north before slavery. Their number did decrease, but they proved that cash crops and the production of it through cheap but not free labor by the lower class such as blacks and whites could save the economy and keep savery away in the goal of having all men being treated equally.
How was life in the North different from life in the South Life in the north was different than the south in multiple ways such as the differences between wages and economy. The different weather And the different kinds of society. The economy between north and south were very different, in the north there were lots of machines which is why there was such a big industrial revolution. But in the south there was more land to be bought and sold. there was a big demand for guns and ammunition to, lots of people needed guns for hunting and protection.
First off is the differences in social structure between the North and South. During the 1800’s, from about 1830 to 1870, the abolitionist movement North was to abolish slavery and put an end to racial inequity. This ties in with the sole cause of civil war because the opposition to slavery in the North and South created an uprising or conflicts between the North and South. The reason why slavery is considered the sole cause because everything ties back to slavery as seen here. Southern slaveholders decided to fight the Northern union as they believed in black emancipation.
Most people worked for a company. The Southern states were plantation owners and worked for themselves. They depended of slave labor, so they didn't really work at all. Southern society depended on slaves, while the north depended of hard work of individuals and large organized corporations. Each side relies on different sources of labor and organization.
Before the election of 1860, the conflicts between the north and the south were already significant. The meltdown of the 1850s is the compilation of a series of events where the north and the south disagreed. Such disagreements inspired the succession of southern states which eventually sparked the American Civil War. In the decade before the civil war, the north and south’s point of view of the slavery institution became poles apart. The north wanted to eradicate it, while the south wanted to spread it to the newly acquired territories.
Most of the Civil War was caused by the North and South having different sides on things. The North wanted to do what they wanted to do their way and the South did theirs how they wanted. That’s why there was constant fighting over the expansion of slavery between the North and
If the slaves missed a few days working on the plantation because of illness or what the case maybe that resulted in revenue loss. Whereas the North had many other alternatives to making revenue, such as mills and other manufacturing companies; the South basically depending on slaves to have income and to support their
In February 1861, a new government was on the horizon in the United States, known as the Confederate States of America. Composed of seven states from the South, this new government looked to separate from a union that they felt was tipping in power towards those who wanted to threaten the rights of the South, especially slavery. Similarly, in early 1775, colonists were preparing for revolution against a power that they felt oppressed their rights and wanted to take away their liberties. However, the Civil War was a not a complete representation of a second American Revolution. The Civil War was more than an unsatisfied party rebelling against a larger power, but a clash between two vastly different ways of life.
There were many differences between the North and the South. For instance, the South were very agricultural as opposed to the North which were industrial. The South used cheap labor in the form of slaves, whereas the North had workers do their jobs in factories at a faster pace. Because of sectionalism, competition between the north and the south began to increase.
In the North slavery wasn't practiced. The economy of the North was mainly dependent on industry. The North depended on the South for
Most were left unfed and if they disobeyed orders they were whipped and cruelly beaten. However, the most of the South didn 't see slavery as inhumane. To them slavery was needed, slaves were needed to help farm, as well as make profit for their owners. Slavery was seen as a source of
“The South grew, but it did not develop,” is the way one historian described the South during the beginning of the nineteenth century because it failed to move from an agrarian to an industrial economy. This was primarily due to the fact that the South’s agricultural economy was skyrocketing, which caused little incentive for ambitious capitalists to look elsewhere for profit. Slavery played a major role in the prosperity of the South’s economy, as well as impacting it politically and socially. However, despite the common assumption that the majority of whites in the South were slave owners, in actuality only a small minority of southern whites did in fact own slaves. With a population of just above 8 million, the number of slaveholders was only 383,637.