In Julius Caesar, a tragedy was written by William Shakespeare, there are two dominant characters; Caesar and Brutus. Both Caesar, who prided himself in his power and wealth, and Brutus, who developed his pride in his honor, ultimately led to their downfall through their hubris. Caesar’s pride led him to his demise because of his immense pride in his power and wealth, leading him to think of himself as invincible and the most powerful in the world. Which in turn, led to those who were once the advisers and friends of Caesar becoming conspirators. When Metellus, one of the conspirators, pleads to Caesar for the return of his banished brother as a test to determine whether Caesar deserved to die or not, Caesar, not knowing his fate claims “I could be well mov’d, if I were as you, (Shakespeare 3.1. 58). Therefore, Caesar claiming that he could be swayed by Metellus’s pleads if he were like the conspirators, indicates that Caesar thinks himself …show more content…
This ultimately led him to believe because he is honorable it was his duty to save Rome from Caesar’s tyranny. Thus, he took measures for what he thought was the better for Rome; killing Caesar. Once the deed had been done, war broke amongst those who killed Caesar and the supporters of Caesar. As the war unfolded and each side dealt several losses, Brutus who was near the battlefield declared to his friend Volumnius, “Our enemy had beat us to the pit./ It is more worthy to leap in ourselves/ Than tarry till they push us,” (Shakespeare 5.5. 23-25) because Brutus is telling Volumnius he believed that it would be more honorable to kill themselves before the enemy did so, shows that Brutus seems to care more about what is more honorable rather than the original purpose for fighting for Rome. Which ultimately leads to his self-induced
Introduction Sometimes it doesn’t matter how bad someone may be, they just have to be better than their competition. In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, the central conflict lies with Julius Caesar. People like Cassius viewed Julius as an up and coming tyrant so he wanted him dead. He convinced Brutus and few other to people help him kill Caesar.
Because of his noble nature Marcus Brutus was very guarded to the idea proposed by Caius Cassius to overthrow their general Caesar, however; as time went on the idea that Caesar would become a tyrant began to seem probable as said by Brutus, “But for the general. He would be crown'd: How that might change his nature, there's the question. It is the bright day that brings forth the adder And that craves wary walking. Crown him that, And then, I grant, we put a sting in him That at his will he may do danger with” (Act II Scene I pg.17).In addition an article written by Back Stage East depicts Marcus Brutus as “strong leading man capable of Hamlet-like introspection, seemingly stoic, his weakness
The fact that Brutus states “Since the quarrel will break no color” (11,1,28-29) this proves that multiple characters are able to manipulate Brutus easily because he believes what the men tell him; even if their statements are not true. Caesar makes claims that to Brutus are irrelevant. Brutus finds that Caesar speaks with dull, meaningless words. Brutus is in contrast with what is happening at the beginning of the play; Brutus first agreed with Caesar’s actions, Brutus was then manipulated to believe Ceasar is in constant error. Also revealed in the play when Casca states ”Are not you moved, when all the sway of the Earth shakes like a thing unfirm” (1, 111, 3-4) Casca states this to Brutus, Casca is revealing that Caesar is like the storm coming through town.
Brutus ‘believed’ that in order to keep Rome from falling to bits, that he had to make the hanus decision on whether or not to commit the deed. Which in the end you see that he did,in fact, murder him anyway. Although Brutus did comply, he didn't do it without feeling
Caesar could easily take advantage of the amount of power he would receive once he became king. Brutus is afraid of Caesar's power upcoming, so he joins the conspirators and listens to their thoughts & ideas into getting rid of Julius Caesar and his upcoming capabilities. Brutus does join the conspiracy, but not as a result for his own personal gain. Brutus knew the people of Rome were in danger. Brutus received letters, as well as conspirators seeking help from him multiple times.
While some may still disagree, viewing his actions as immoral or dishonorable, I believe that Brutus’s intentions truly were noble and that his righteousness is indisputable. Brutus loved Caesar greatly, but his love for Rome simply exceeded that love and inevitably led to his afflictive decision. He acted purely out of his devotion to Rome and eventually even sacrificed his own life for the country he loved and valued so greatly. Brutus’s sacrifices should not be disregarded, and instead the courage and morality he displayed should be honored and
This proves that he would be the best fit for the ruler of Rome because he is willing to make sacrifices to save his people and the men that fought beside him. The act of killing himself shows the level of honor and self-pride that Brutus has and proves he would be the best ruler for Rome. One might think this would make him unfit to be a ruler but truly brings out how much of a good fit he would be by showing he would do anything for his
Brutus’s two conflicting loyalties influence the ultimate downfall of Julius Caesar and the uprising of the Roman people. Even though Brutus’s love and loyalty for his friend Caesar
Caesar, an autocrat who views himself as a god, and Brutus, who prides himself on being as honorable as he can, both show an excessive amount of hubris throughout the story. Their overconfidence leads them through a dangerous path ultimately resulting in their demise. Caesar displays his hubris multiple times throughout the story by thinking himself to be almighty, instigating his closest friends to turn on him. At the senate house with his friends and allies, Caesar declares that he is as "constant as the northern star, / of whose true-fix'd and resting quality / there is no fellow in the firmament. "(Shakespeare
Near the beginning of act II, Brutus has a soliloquy in which he is trying to decide whether joining the conspiracy is the right thing to do. He discusses reasons for why killing Caesar may be appropriate for the current situation of him being crowned king. Brutus also reveals his thoughts about some of Caesar’s behavior and what could happen (based on human nature) if he is given power. In the end, he decides to join with the conspiracy and kill Caesar.
Although Caesar, as the upcoming ruler of Rome in Julius Caesar, should be portrayed as the ideal leader of the play, he actually has too arrogant of a character to be so. Therefore, Shakespeare places honor in Brutus and allows Brutus to have the role of the idealistic leader of the story. Although Shakespeare writes this play in a controversial time period during England’s political turmoil, he allows the audience to be able to choose the true ruler of loyalty to the crown or the honor of a noble man through the understanding of the two contrasting character
Brutus realized the great harm Caesar could bring to Rome if the was crowned king. Although Brutus was easily persuaded by Cassius to go as far as committing a murder, Brutus did it because he thought that it was the best for Rome. Brutus does what he thinks is the absolute best for Rome which really shows his great honor and
One of the key themes in Julius Caesar is ambition. Caesar is a man of great ambition, and this ambition ultimately leads to his downfall. He believes that he is invincible and that no one can stop him from achieving his goals. This arrogance blinds him to the dangers that
Julius Caesar is a play full of pride, yes or no? I would think yes, so much that it can be a theme of the book. A theme that is still one today. Literary devices used by Shakespeare help show the pride of the characters in Julius Caesar. Some elements of fiction even show the theme of pride in this play.
In public, Caesar was the leader Rome had always wished for, a strong, valliant man that would let nothing in his way. Consequently, Caesar had a more vulnerable side to him where the reader would be able to see glimpses of throughout the play. Still, Caesar allowed his public self image to take priority in which would eventually lead to his death. Speaking historically, the great Julius Caesar was a people’s leader with a deep hunger for power in which he would do anything to