ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of Gun Control For Dummies

744 Words3 Pages

“Gun Control for Dummies” is a comic illustrated by William Warren. The comic depicts a before and after situation. In these situations, a law-abiding citizen originally has two firearms and is standing next to a criminal who also has a gun. However, in the “after” scenario the citizen no longer has possession of firearms, but the criminal next to him does. The author’s claim in this comic is that gun control will not prevent criminals from keeping or obtaining guns but will leave law-abiding citizens without protection. With rhetorical techniques, the artist effectively convinces viewers that if firearms are banned, law-abiding citizens will be left as prey to criminals. Throughout the illustration, the author effectively implements rhetorical …show more content…

One of the major differences between the “before” and “after” photo in the illustration, is that the citizen does not change in any way. The citizen is standing in the exact position during both the “before” and “after” illustrations. However, his guns are missing in the second photo to portray the impact of gun control. By not changing his body language or movement, the citizen trusts that the gun laws enacted will keep him safe. However, the citizen is unknowing to the fact that the criminal next to him illegally possesses a hand-gun. The criminal clearly knows that the citizen has no way to protect himself, and he gladly smirks at the idea of an unfair fight. A powerful illustration like this is very relatable. The citizen is used to represent any citizen of the United States; while the criminal could be anyone looking to cause harm. This illustration makes it persuasively clear that if gun control laws are put in place, everyday citizens will be left defenseless to criminals. By appealing to pathos, Warren makes the viewer of his comic unsettled with the idea of not being able to fairly protect themselves from criminals if gun restrictions are put into

Show More
Related

  • Commentary On Rhetorical Analysis Of Mass Shootings By Butler

    463 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mass Shootings The evidence that was provided by Butler was very clear and understanding. First, Butler uses the study published in The American Journal of Public Health, authors Johnathan Metzl and Kenneth Macleish, find that in mass shootings “notions of mental illness” mirror “cultural stereotypes and anxieties about “race/ethnicity, social class and politics. ”(Butler 1). Furthermore, each race seems to have a label.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Mass Shootings By Derek Thompson

    602 Words  | 3 Pages

    In his article, author Derek Thompson highlights the felonious actions that mark today’s society. Thompson’s purpose is to call lawmakers and researchers alike to take a stand against mass shootings and to stop the perpetrators. He utilizes stylistic devices as well as argumentative devices to enlighten the reader of the relationship between all of the recent shootings and their contagion. Beginning his article, Thompson lists the recent mass murders in the United States while also using figurative language, convincing the reader to agree with his argument that mass shootings are contagious.

    Read More

  • How Gun Control Kills Rhetorical Analysis

    610 Words  | 3 Pages

    The article states, “Gun control deters violent crime as well as the death penalty” (Hunter). The author uses logos here to point out that gun control is an ineffective as the death penalty when it comes to preventing violence. This supports his argument against strict gun control because, according to Hunter, many Liberals claim to oppose the death penalty because it does little to prevent future crime, yet Liberals are for strict gun control. However, strict gun control isn’t going to prevent criminals from committing crimes, because criminals do not follow the law

    Read More

  • Gun Violence Rhetorical Analysis

    682 Words  | 3 Pages

    The whole situation has not been resolved, nobody can come to an agreement when it comes to gun violence so the shade of grey makes the resemblance to the disagreement of the situation. All the emotions that the PSA is portraying are very persuasive towards parents around the country for the reason that it makes them want the best for their children. Parents around the country want to make sure their children are in a safe environment so they could acquire their education and succeed in life. This PSA is great to persuade parents to vote against guns so they make the community safer for their children. Another emotion the PSA portrays is sympathy.

    Read More

  • Argument On Gun Shootings

    1372 Words  | 6 Pages

    This comic is unsuccessful due to the lack of hard evidence. By just looking at the comic the author is saying that shooters aren’t being diagnosed. When the shooter isn’t diagnosed the author wants us to interpret this as if they’re going to end up shooting something. However, this isn’t true at all and there is no real evidence saying that they will. Also, there is no logic communicated to us why the individual had to go to the extreme to get attention drawn to them.

    Read More

  • Arguments For Gun Control Laws

    116 Words  | 1 Pages

    One of the major arguments for the elimination of firearms, and derivatively for gun control laws, is that such measures would reduce the number of criminal homicides.' It has been argued, however, that eliminating guns would have no such effect because if somebody wants to kill, he will find a weapon to achieve "his destructive goal"; there is, it is said, more than one way to skin a cat. This paper is an attempt to bring this phase of the gun control debate closer to a resolution, through analysis of data from the Police Department of the City of Chicago on reported criminal homicides and serious, but not fatal, criminal assaults during 1965, 1966, and 1967.

    Read More

  • Our Blind Spot About Guns Rhetorical Analysis

    642 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Our Blind Spot about Guns” Rhetorical Analysis Essay American Journalist, Nicholas Kristof, in his essay, “Our Blind Spot about Guns”, addresses that if only guns were regulated and controlled like cars, there would be less fatalities. Kristof’s purpose is to emphasize how much safer cars are now than in the past, while guns do not have the same precautions. He constructs a compelling tone in order to convince the reader that the government should take more control on the safety of guns and who purchases them. Kristof builds credibility by successfully exerting emotional appeals on the audience, citing plausible statistics, and discussing what could possibly be done to prevent gun fatalities. Kristof begins his essay by discussing how automobile

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Confessions Of A Liberal Gun Owner By Justin Cronin

    796 Words  | 4 Pages

    Justin Cronin’s “Confessions of a Liberal Gun Owner” is a dynamic op-ed explaining his social and political dilemma of being an armed leftist. Residing in Texas, he is not arguing to outlaw guns, but rather regulate the accessibility of guns. The author is a self-described devout democrat, but explains his reasoning and logic behind his right to bear arms. He effectively defends his use of the second amendment and the need for regulation by the use of his personal anecdotes that served as a counterargument. Cronin surrounds his argument by explaining his circumstances regarding gun ownership.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis On School Shootings

    889 Words  | 4 Pages

    School Shootings: How We All Miss the Point... The aftermath of a school shooting is tragic, depressing, and causes hatred for the lives lost and the person who took them. Everyone, especially the media, tries to interpret why the shooter killed their victims, or why they felt the need to end others’ lives and their own. How We All Miss the Point on School Shootings, by Mark Manson, explains what and why these mass shootings happen. He starts by using examples of shootings and the murderer’s past.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Our Blind Spot About Guns

    836 Words  | 4 Pages

    Guns don’t kill people. People kill people. Many believe this, but columnist Nicholas Kristof, author of “Our Blind Spot about Guns,” published in 2014 in the New York Times, disagrees. A rhetorical analysis should consist of: logos, pathos, and ethos. Kristof’s use of logos is strong due to the amount of facts and statistics he offers to his audience, but he fails to strongly use pathos and ethos, due to the lack of these elements Kristof’s argument is weakened.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Gunned Down: The Power Of The NRA

    978 Words  | 4 Pages

    The PBS program “Gunned Down: The power of the NRA” highlighted how the NRA continues it’s stranglehold on the government and gun policies. It is quite clear that gun control advocates attempt to play off the emotion of citizens whereas pro gun advocates fear the public into believing the government is attempting to steal their guns and liberties. The side of the gun control advocates can be seen through the likes of President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden. Conversely, the pro gun effort is shown through Ringleader Wayne LaPierre who continues to save the NRA and second amendment rights. President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden were both portrayed as compassionate, caring individuals that were fighting for a life or

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Essay: The Case For More Guns By Jeffrey Goldberg

    1499 Words  | 6 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay on The Case For More Guns In “The Case for more Guns”, the author Jeffrey Goldberg staff writer for the Atlantic, implies why more people with concealed carry permits could keep American citizens safer. Goldberg’s purpose is to inform the reader that guns in the hands of criminals are dangerous, but also that more people with the proper training to handle a gun could keep us safer. Goldberg’s points are valid and based on events that have occurred and if a reader is not pro-2nd amendment they could be persuaded with the facts that he points out.

    Read More

  • Police Brutality Rhetorical Analysis

    425 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the essay titled “Police Brutality”, Danna Hernandez uses rhetorical devices to declare that police brutality is dreadful. She utilizes anecdotes to support her claim, pathos to persuade the audience to agree with her argument by producing an emotional response, and imagery to illustrate her hardships caused by police brutality. Danna does this in order to make the general public realize that police brutality is a significant issue that should not be treated as a trend. Danna Hernandez uses anecdote to support her argument. The vast majority of the essay is an anecdote that tells of the tragic death of her son due to unjustified gun usage by a police officer(which constitutes as police brutality) and the emotional consequences that followed.

    Read More

  • Why Guns Should Not Be Banned Essay

    1700 Words  | 7 Pages

    In today’s society, one of the most alienating issues in American politics is gun control. More specifically, the issue is whether or not guns should be banned in the United States. Some people would say that guns should be banned because it would reduce crime as a whole and keep citizens safer. These people, enthusiasts of stricter gun laws, fear being safe in their country where there are so many people who have access to guns. Opponents of this argument, however, also fear losing safety.

    Read More

  • Why Is Gun Control Important?

    978 Words  | 4 Pages

    Last year, handguns alone killed 48 people in Japan, 34 people in Switzerland, 8 people in Great Britain, and 10, 728 people in the United States. This proves how gun control laws are so essential to keeping people away from the threat that guns pose to society. Although guns might be used as a source of self-defense, an increase in the number of gun control laws are necessary to lower death rates due to guns, to ban weapons that account for much of the violence, and to eliminate the misinterpretation the second amendment for one 's selfish purposes. One reason why gun control laws are so crucial is to reduce the number of gun deaths in the United States.

    Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of Gun Control For Dummies

Open Document