Similarities Between Big Stick Policy And Good Neighbor Policy

1173 Words5 Pages

All policies were utilized to keep the US as the dominant power over the Americas. It allowed them to build good relationships or influence most of Latin America. The moral diplomacy and big stick diplomacy were both policies that included fighting off threats to the US. The big stick and good neighbor policy were both policies that were enforced keeping peace within the Americas when possible. Big Stick Policy was created by President Theodore Roosevelt, Dollar Diplomacy was created by President William Howard Taft and his Secretary of State Philander C. Knox, Moral Diplomacy was created by President Woodrow Wilson and Good Neighbor Policy was created by President Franklin Roosevelt. Another similarity between these policies is that they were all created to benefit the United States but the policies help the United States in different ways. The Big Stick Policy help made U.S a world power and had every nation believing that the U.S. military was powerful and willing to enforce action when needed, which created fear. The Dollar Diplomacy help the United State …show more content…

Julius Pratt also argued that whenever a war would start back up the stock market would drop and scared the people with the economy. The United State had invest in the sugar production so business man would try to think of a way to solve the situation with Cuba. Basically Julius Pratt argued that the United States went to war to gain more stuff while the people living in the nation was afraid of the effect the war can

Open Document