There has been a big controversy from years ago about whether or not NCAA students athletes should be paid a salary. This issue is important because so many people believe that these college athletes are already being paid through the scholarships they receive for their studies. However, others argue that they are not been given enough for all their sacrifices and hard work while playing in the field. There are countless reasons why it is fair for students athletes in college to obtain at least a minimum payment, and some of them are because colleges are producing lots of money with students playing sports, body injuries can dramatically risk athletes’ scholarships, and finally because they deserve to receive something back from having their …show more content…
Students athletes are having their mind and body exploited with all the different activities they go through everyday. Being a college student and an athlete at the same time is not easy, they have too much things to do besides having classes. According to Oliver, a college athlete 's day consists in the following: waking up early in the morning to do exercise, then go to class, after class there is practice, next go get a quickly eating (if possible), later attend to practice, and finally the student athlete has to make sure to finish all the homeworks and work behind for the classes. Hence, a day is just not enough for college athletes to accomplish all those obligations they experience; “sometimes they don’t even get to eat anything throughout the day or before going to bed” (Oliver), however they still have to go practice or play in a game without having the energy necessary. But, what are they receiving back for having their mind and body exploiting? nothing! Except scholarships that as mentioned before, can be canceled if an injury comes in the way. Therefore, there is a necessity to change the system in which colleges treat their athletes because they deserve and should get paid for the sacrifices they do outside of a classroom. In conclusion, despite the fact that so many people argue that college athletes shouldn’t be given a salary because they already have scholarships and also sports are seen as a part of the education itself, these athletes should be awarded with a payment because colleges and the NCAA are not only producing money off of them, but also because college athletes are being exploited by all the activities they do every day and when they suffer an injury, there is a huge possibility that their scholarships get
Paying College Athletes There are several reasons why college athletes should receive a form of payment. The athletes always seem to be practicing, which means that they are almost always busy, leaving little time for anything else. Additionally, they have to go to their classes and study in order to participate in that particular sport. In contrast, giving the athletes money could potentially be a bad idea. Some athletes might receive more because their sport may generate more money.
Colleges generate billions off of players, therefore it should not hurt to compensate student athletes, furthermore, these players are risking their health and well-being without receiving a penny in return, and lastly, getting paid to play can teach these young student athletes financial responsibility. To begin with, colleges generate billions off of players, therefore, it should not hurt to indemnify their student athletes. Paying each athlete even at minimum wage is better than nothing, in addition, it would not even make a dent in the billions the colleges produce because of the players. All jersey sales, ticket sales, television revenue, and basically all outlets of income get dispersed to the coaches, the staff, the schools, the NCAA and any and everyone involved
Currently there are 460,000 student athletes in the U.S. according to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Most of these student athletes along with many other people think that they should get paid money by the university that they are attending or by the NCAA for playing a sport for the college and making the college money in that sport. On the other hand, there are also people who think that these college/student athletes should not get paid for many reasons. Most reasons are because the athletes are already accepting scholarships, paying athletes takes away from the purity of game, and the universities should be treating the college athletes the same as their college peers within the school. College students should not get paid because they most likely are accepting scholarships, paying the athletes takes away from the purity of the game, and colleges should be treating the athletes
College sports have become a big business in recent years, with universities and the NCAA earning billions of dollars in revenue from television deals, merchandise sales, and other sources. However, the athletes who generate this revenue are not compensated for their participation in sports. This has led to a growing debate about whether college athletes should be paid for their participation in sports. The exploitation of college athletes and the significant revenue they generate for universities and the NCAA without any direct compensation for their participation in sports necessitates the need for paying them. This would not only address their financial challenges and ensure a level playing field but also provide fair compensation for their
They spend countless hours practicing, traveling, and competing, all while trying to balance their academics. Many of them come from low-income backgrounds and could use the money to support themselves and their families. Additionally, college sports generate a lot of revenue for universities, and it seems unfair that the athletes who are actually responsible for producing that revenue don't see any of it. However, there are some arguments against paying student athletes.
As the NCAA revenue continues to climb, pressure to pay student athletes is growing(“Why college athletes deserve compensation” 1).Former NFL player Michael Bennett told ESPN, “Heck yeah college athletes should be paid(Reasons Why Student Athletes Should Be Paid” 2).He says “NCAA gets paid, Rose Bowl gets paid, everybody gets paid except the people making the product(“Reasons Why Student Athletes Should Be Paid” 2). There is an extreme amount of attention brought to curtain sports around the world, and that is Football, and Basketball(“Why College Athletes Should Be Compensated” 1). These sports alone generate Billions of dollars every year for just such a short period of time, and this revenue that is being brought in from not only these two sports, but the other sports that other 4-year universities may have, is not being used in the right ways(“Why College Athletes Should Be Compensated” 2). The money that is being brought in every year seems to never find the student
College sports are a significant part of American culture and generate billions of dollars in revenue every year. While universities profit greatly from the work of college athletes, the athletes themselves receive no compensation for their hard work. The question of whether college athletes should be paid has been debated in recent years, with strong arguments on both sides. In this essay, I will argue that college athletes should be paid for their work.
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.
In the documentary schooled: the price of college sports I learned that the NCAA does not treat student athletes like employees but these students are treated like slaves it all started in 1971 when the young Caucasian man by name of started playing college football for TSU, he was the running back for the team and when he caught the ball in running he was hit by two other players from the opposing team which caused him to be paralyzed for the rest of his life. Most of the players feel that they should be paid for playing college sports but the NCAA believes that a student who gets a full scholarship to play any sport at a university should not be paid because they are being paid with a free education, room, and board, and free meals, the NCAA
Paying these college athletes will help pay for more than just extra activities. This money could help pay for students textbooks and other materials for education. Some textbooks, school supplies and even clothes for going to football banquets more often than not have to come out of the players’ pockets. Full scholarships can be great for students who get extra money from
The NCAA is one of the biggest organizations and one of the most polemical arguments in the college sports world is whether student athletes should be paid or not beyond a scholarship. Student athletes are being exploited for their hard work and dedication to the sport. Universities give the illusion that they are providing fair compensation with an athletic scholarship however, they profit off of the student athletes. The NCAA states that student athletes should not be paid because they are amateurs compared to professionals and prohibits them from receiving any money from anything other than a part time job. College athletes deserve a perquisite beyond a scholarship; the NCAA is taking the time from college athletes, profiting way more
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
In “Why Should College Athletes Be Paid” author Imed Bouchrika first begins by explaining what college athletics are and what role they play in some students’ lives. Bouchrika details the Student-Athlete Compensation System, which includes the $3.7 billion provided by the NCAA to DI and DII colleges for athletic scholarships. Bouchrika then moves into the main idea of his article, why should college athletes be paid? He states several pros and cons, such as payment is the equal to a work-study basis. The money given to student-athletes
Also from the article Should College Athletes Be Paid, it shows In comparison, student athletes already have it easier, financially, than most of the other kids at school.” Many athletes already receive benefits from scholarships which save them plenty of