Are texters all over the universe demolishing the English Language? In John Humphrys’ “I h8 txt msgs: How texting is wrecking our language” he argues that texters all over the world, and beyond, are destroying the language that we once knew and loved simply because society is looking for a quicker and easier way to do things. In the article, Humphrys also brings to many reader’s attention that everyone is gradually partaking in the use of text language, despite their intentions. In the article he uses logical evidence and facts to prove his argument, he also appears trustworthy by being open minded, and additionally is able to connect with the readers emotionally; by doing this he is convincing the readers that they can find satisfaction by using a dictionary and not falling …show more content…
He states “[Our language] is constantly evolving and anyone who tries to get in the way is a fuddy-duddy who deserves to be run down. I agree. One of the joys of the English language and one of the reasons it has been so successful in spreading across the globe is that it is infinitely adaptable.” With Humphrys using this ethical appeal, it makes him seem fair, trustworthy, and credible by agreeing that the English language does change. By using this statement he shows that he is open minded to the fact that things change over time and that is acceptable. A strong emotional appeal is also used in Humphrys’ “I h8 txt msgs: How texting is wrecking our language” by resonating with the reader when he explains that the use of a dictionary will actually be fulfilling. He states “The eye falls on a word you've never seen before or one whose meaning you have always wanted to check, and you close the dictionary just a little bit richer for the experience.” By using this emotional appeal, Humphrys is able to evoke the feeling that the reader will be pleased from the experience of using a dictionary and therefore be richer with
Raghuram Venkatapuram English, Period B7 9/19/16 Rhetorical Analysis Essay Excerpt from “Preface to A Dictionary of the English Language” - By Samuel Johnson. In this excerpt, Samuel Johnson’s feelings about dictionary writers is are very strong, in a sense that he has a direct emotional appeal on the reader about how they, the dictionary writers, are often neglected. In this essay, I will focus on two rhetorical terms - ‘asyndeton’ and, from Aristotle’s Three Appeals, ‘Pathos’ or emotion.
Today, texting has become the most widely used communication technique for teenagers and young adults. It is written in completely informal language and it has no literature value in it. Although the critics believe texting is destroying literature value, McWhorter has another opinion in mind. McWhorter thinks that texting is another form of language that is developed by teenagers. It is the creation of a brand new language evolving from the old literature.
In her essay "Does Texting Affect Writing?", Michaela Cullington presents her argument that texting does not impact formal writing written by students. She discusses the concerns presented by many people about how texting language can transfer into writing, but through the use of personal experiences and credible sources she discusses how this is not true. Her use of multiple different studies and situations help boost her argument and allow the reader to truly see how students actually do formal writing. She presents a strong argument as to why those who believe students don't have the control and knowledge to write formally, instead of with text speak, are wrong.
In this passage written by Lord Chesterfield, he talks to his son and the evolution of the English language, being advanced in his diction and descriptive in his phrasing. Along with those two strategies, he uses pathos to show the emotions of a father towards a son and the virtues he wants his son to learn throughout his journey to adulthood. The reader is informed that this letter Lord Chesterfield wrote was for his son who was younger, but the reader did not know what age the young boy was. Throughout the letter, Lord Chesterfield uses an advanced diction such as, “... moroseness… imperviousness… garrulity… conducive… emulation…”
Texting is ubiquitous in modern Western society. It's a convenient way to communicate basic ideas quickly without having to commit to a phone conversation or the long wait for a letter. All of this is done through cellular phones on the go and many teenagers have subscribed to this method of communication as their primary one. When texting, it is customary to abbreviate certain words in order to save time. These abbreviations can be considered a language that evolves out of texting, and that language can be referred to as textspeak.
In the passage from The Great Influenza, John M. Barry uses rhetorical strategies like: antithetical ideas, extended metaphors, and diction to characterize scientific research. In the first paragraph, Barry uses a parallel sentence structure of an antithetical idea when discussing Certainty versus Uncertainty, he uses Certainty versus Uncertainty to intensify the words in the next paragraph. " Certainty creates strength. Certainty gives one something upon which to lean.
Cullington after summarizing her research and having said both sides of opinions about texting affecting writing, she used the results as evidence of why Cullington disagreed that texting has no effect in writing. “On the basis of my own research, experts research, and personal observations, I can confidently state that texting is not interfering with student’s use of standards written English…” (Cullington 370). As you can see she used the strategy of disagreeing but with an explanation and summarized what her discoveries were. Cullington also agreed that texting is used on an everyday basis and at every moment that is possible. To agree to this Cullington included her own personal experience as a reference that texting effectively is used anywhere at any
The Rhetorical Analysis of the “America Needs its Nerds” The mental capacity is treated as a disadvantage in the America, despite the fact it already helped the country many times. This long-term problem became the main topic of the Leonid Fridman’s essay “America Needs its Nerds”. The work first appeared on January 11, 1990 in the New York Times as a part of the series “Voices of the New Generation”. The author spoke about the negative attitude the American society has to smart people and demonstrates it with the usage of words like “nerd” or “geek”.
George Orwell is the author of, “Politics and the English Language”, an article in which he attempts to persuade the reader to believe his claim that politics are influencing modern writing, in turn causing lazy and vague writing. Orwell says that, “Political language-...is designed to make lies sound truthful”(539). Essentially, his main point is that the habit of writing fancily for little reason, or with little purpose, is reversible with significant effort. Orwell’s goal is to get his readers to follow an “elementary” set of rules listed near the end of the article. He believes that there can be no good writers that do not follow the rules stated.
In her essay “Does Texting Affect Writing?” Michaela Cullington addresses the issue of text messaging possibly causing poor communication skills and the use of textspeak, abbreviations used during text messaging such as “LOL” and “g2g,” in students’ formal writing. Cullington argues that “texting actually has a minimal effect on student writing” (pg. 367). She addresses the opposition directly, even citing credible sources. However, she also cites credible sources with better information to support her point, and even conducts an experiment of her own.
(1). He uses the rhetorical device of figurative language to give the reader a strong image of his feeling
Not So Fast” Andrea Lunsford researched students’ writing for 30-plus years to see what effect new technology has on how students learn. Lunsford discovered that students are actually improving their own writing skills with the help of mass media. Not only does it allow students more access to educational resources and information, but it also encourages students to do more creative thinking and writing outside of class which Lunsford refers to in her article as “life writing.” In her research she recalls the account of a student who sent a friend a text message which was completely informal and would be considered unprofessional by most piers. However, the same student also sent a very formal and professional report to her faculty adviser later on.
In the article, “Have we literally broken the English Language? ”, the author Martha Gill depicts a fact that the word “literally” has changed its semantic meaning from literally to figuratively. Gill’s perspective that people need to “avoid [the word “literally”] completely” indicates her prescriptive attitude towards the word’s meaning change since she focuses on correcting the rules how people should use a word. At first sight, prescriptivism emphasizes that people should follow rules learnt consciously in school to speak and write a language. At the beginning of the article, Gill provides the definition of the word “literally” based on Google to show that many words have developed their original meanings in recent days.
What do we mean when we speak of a language ‘dying ’? How does it happen? Can it be predicted? Canit be prevented? (Moseley.
It might be seen as something interminable however English has turned into a, for the most part, language used in 80% of the content. The cause of this could be traced back to a phenomenon called globalization – a globalized language is form. The effect of globalization on language may cause a digital language divide within the cultural context within a society. This would lead to a collapsing context whereby the competition between digital native (local people) and digital immigrants (foreigners) is demonstrated on activities such as rock climbing or any extreme sport nature in a host country which requires a localized expert but instead rely on information provided by the internet as their guide at foreign