Do you ever wonder how many peoples actions and attributions have been overlooked, ignored, or taken credit for in the past? Well Double Victory by Cheryl Mullenbach gives the public a deep and detailed look into many African- American women’s lives in the past, and how their attempts to help win World War II were far overlooked and ignored. This was based strictly on the fact that they were African American Women. This book shows the barriers; both racial and gender, that these strong black women needed to break to receive full credit and respect for what they have accomplished. The overall theme and or purpose of this book was to expose the racial and sexual discrimination African American women experienced just to do their work, and shows …show more content…
This is for many reasons. One of the ways is the fact that it is unique; Unique in the way that not many books are on this subject in general. Another unique trait is that it takes a different type of perspective, one that most book wouldn’t dare to take; by looking to the dark side of a huge American win, literally. This makes the book very refreshing and intriguing because it is hard to get bored reading when you do not know what to expect. Another reason is the way the book was set up, this did not allow the storyteller to dwell too much on one subject or story, forcing the book to lack in lengthy and boring listing of factual evidence. Overall this aided the book in being an exceptional read. This book also had many specific strengths. The strengths of Double Victory was the way Mullenbach decided to present the information. This was through stories, in separation of certain subjects and work forces. This was a very large asset towards theme portrayal and interest factor. Another strength is the massive amount of information Mullenbach is giving this makes the book very fast paced and not monotonous. As for weaknesses of Double Victory, I could not seem to find any, I found this book to be very interesting and would classify it as an exceptional read without …show more content…
With these facts being presented to me, especially in relation to Civil Rights and Liberties, it was challenging not to make real world connections and see true examples of government and politics in action. During this read I made a vast amount of connections and learned an abundance of new stories and information about government. Being more specific, Double Victory taught me many African- American women’s stories and struggles in labor and work forces relating to Civil Rights. Overall I learned the immense asset that black women were to World War 2 and the hardships they experienced to gain that title that still, not many people know of today. I also learned that many people have overlooked their struggles, and their contribution to America, especially in that time frame. Although this book taught me many things individually, it strongly contributes to the public and a larger conceptual understanding of the U.S struggling and growing in its ability to enforce and live out the principles of the Constitution, of democracy, and of a world leader. This is done by giving information or insight to the public of how equality among the principles of both the Constitution and democracy was enforced among African-American women in the past. Although at the time we globally led and still do in equality among all people, it did not fulfill the framers intention with the democracy created within the
Eyes off the Prize by Carol Anderson is a historical narrative that examines the struggle of various African American organizations to raise the issue of human rights before the United Nations in the aftermath of World War II. Throughout 1944-1955, several organizations such as the NAACP, National Negro Congress (NNC), and Civil Rights Congress played important roles in the protection of U.S. human rights policies. She focuses on the NAACP and their mission to end segregation and inequality in America but with the rise of anti-communism and start of the Cold War powerful Southerners were able to dismiss this offensive, which then began the Civil Rights Movement. Anderson’s mission is not to examine the struggle for civil rights, but instead the true “prize” that is human rights in order to answer why inequality was still prominent post Civil Rights Movement.
The Civil War, fought mostly by men, is often referred to as the war of brother against brother. Although there were a few women who engaged in the battles alongside the men, the number was very small and their direct contribution to battle was probably not very significant. This is not to say that women were not important to the Civil War. Women were very influential in the national crisis and their contributions were arguably just as important as the male soldier’s on the battlefield. On both sides of the war, women employed their strength, intelligence, and compassion in the critical roles of abolitionists, civil right’s advocates, nurses and spies.
The Clansman which was published in 1905 by Thomas Dixon Jr., and is the second book in a trilogy following the post-Civil War era, debuted at a time when the country was still recovering from the Civil War and African Americans were attempting to make their way into politics while continuing to lobby for equality. The book opens in 1865 when the war ends and follows the Reconstruction period showcasing both sides of the conflict and bringing to light the reemergence of the Ku Klux Klan throughout the story as well as bringing to light the social stigmas and discrimination of the time. Thomas Frederick Dixon Jr. was born in Shelby, North Carolina on January 11, 1864 to Thomas Jeremiah Frederick Dixon II and Amanda Elvira McAffe. His father
I found this book very interesting and crisp with lots of detail. This book shows the journey of two men James Garfield and Charles Guiteau and how both their paths collided with an ending that led to sorrow and grief. This
Jeff Shaara did a outstanding job of portraying the generals’ thoughts and feelings. It was so well written that I felt more connected to the characters and understood them more because I read about the events of the Civil War through their point of view. I would definitely recommend this book to a friend, especially if they want a glimpse of the American Civil War and its heroic
It not only provided an abundant amount of information, but gave the reader a different understanding of the history of the world. Throughout the book, Diamond never failed to prove a point and, of course, answer the captivating question that will forever remain stuck in Diamond’s mind. Nonetheless, I would not recommend this book to anyone looking for an amusing or entertaining selection, seeing as they would lose interest very
Sure it had a lot of things I loved, but it lacked a "wow" factor that would 've blew my mind away. But still, this book also had a lot
In her speech, “For the Equal Rights Amendment” Shirley Chisholm addresses her views on securing women’s equality to ensure women have better opportunities. She is an American politician, educator and author that became the first black woman elected to the United States Congress. Chisholm supports her claims about equal rights for women by using examples of statistics to prove a point. Her purpose is to persuade her audience that women in America are neglected by equal rights and excluded from things that men are not. Throughout her deliverance she expressed an inspiring and informative tone to uplift her audience so that Congress can make a change for women.
The novel proves to be a success through its incredible ability to include suspense, useful and comprehensive
The excerpt I chose to reflect on is called “An End to the Neglect of the Problems of the Negro Woman!” by Claudia Jones (1949). Jones express the concerns that women of color in her time suffer from the neglect and degradation they receive throughout their lives. During this time, the reason many African American women go through the struggles in their community originated from the notion that the “bourgeoisie is fearful of the militancy of the Negro woman” (108). In my opinion, they have every right to be afraid of African American women. As Jones stated nicely "once Negro women undertake action, the militancy of the whole Negro people, and thus of the anti-imperialist coalition, is greatly enhanced" (108).
Sometimes the book did not seem realistic because of the exaggeration that was in it but it also made the book kind of confusing. Even though the exaggeration has a negative effect to the book it does not mean it ruined the book. The book is overall good, but less exaggeration would make it
Legal historian Mary Dudziak, author of the book Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy, explores impacts of Cold War foreign affairs on American civil rights. Dudziak argues that the United States government pushed for civil rights reforms due to risk’s to the nation’s alleged moral supremacy. Dissecting the so-called Negro problem as propaganda muscle during the Cold War resulting in the mistreatment of persons of color. Dudziak uses the book The Unsteady March: The Rise and Decline of Racial Equality in America, written by Philip A. Klinkner with Rogers A. Smith to underscore the point that civil rights activists’ were aware of racism during and after WWI.
During World War II, the soldiers overseas were exposed to a much different world—a world where racial segregation was not the norm. This upside-down world abroad had an astounding effect on the black soldiers who returned home after the war to the segregated society they had left behind. This effect, the growth in NAACP membership, and the development of a southern black middle class helped to motivate African Americans to demand a dramatic change that would put an end to their oppression. Thus, the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s emerged, and blacks were determined to revolutionize American society. The two historians, Howard Zinn and Alan Brinkley, focused on this movement in their book’s A People’s History of the United States
Value- One of the main advantages of this book is the fact that it is rather fact based, and contains minimal amounts of story-like quality. Although this can be viewed as a limitation, the fact that the book was written few years after the events took place could be beneficial as primary resources would have been available in abundance. Both through written evidence, but also eyewitness
It is not so much concerned with social defeats and victories as with its "adamic falls and quixotic redemptions". But on the contrary, as Jonathan Baunbach has pointed out, it seeks to examine, "by the large the shadow landscape of the self, often in the disguise of a dimly recognizable "real" world-a Mythic world more consequential than the one it pretends to represent, more believable and horrible, more possible to survive in"1 Stemming from a disinterested study of experience, the American novel relatively is free from the pseudo technical virtuosity, which tends to vitiate much of recent