When it comes to the topic of guns, most of us will readily agree that it is our constitutional right to bare arms. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of as AR platform and assault rifles. Whereas some are convinced that we should not be able to own them, others maintain that we should be able to own assault rifles. The term “assault weapon” is an invention of pro-gun control politicians that demonizes semi-automatic rifles with certain looks. These looksdo not cause the rifles to operate any differently or fire any faster than a typical semi-automatic hunting rifle.The looks do not cause the rifles to operate or fire different from a typical semi-automatic hunting rifle An assault rifle is the same as a semi-automatic …show more content…
handguns do.In 2012 only 322 were killed with any rifle so even fewer with assault rifles.
Banning these gun will make it harder for criminals to get there hands on them which will cause crime rate to go down. A ban would help public safety agencies root out domestic terror threats more effectively. Instead of worrying about the intent of certain assault rifle owners, agencies could go after all assault weapons, period. Individual privacy and independence would increase, as would America’s collective security.
With fewer gun laws there will be less crime and less Terrorist attacks because civilians will fight back if they can that’s why the crime is so high where there are strict gun laws and more terrorist attacks.Take parris for example they have the strictest gun laws in the world and that’s why they were targeted because nobody could stop them.It is our constitutional rights as citizens of America to own and bare arms,Why let the government take that away from
In most recent years, legislation in the United States has done little to implement stricter gun control laws due to the gridlocks in Congress surrounding the divisive issue. The Assault Weapon Ban was created in 1994 and lasted until 2004, and during these years, it became illegal to produce certain automatic weapons and purchase high capacity cartridges. After the creation of this law, many weapon manufacturers began to find ways around the ban by modifying weapons so they did not fall into the category of banned firearms (Plumer). With the research that exists today it is hard to credit the ban with reducing gun violence, but statistically during this time period the number of people killed in mass shootings did go down and since the ban has expired the number of mass shootings per year has
Extreme anti-gun hardliners issue cries exclaiming weapons are to blame and banning assault rifles would eliminate mass shootings entirely. The predicament is America is extremely well-armed with the assault rifle, so more would need to be done in conjunction with the ban to combat the issue such as a
Multiple people live in certain environments where they need these types of weapons to protect them. By banning assault weapons this might ruin their entire life. On the “New York Post”, they state banning of assault weapons is nothing but a symbolism and will not be a difference. The article states this because even if assault weapons were to ban, there will still be handguns and all types of firearms out there. Americans who had an assault weapon before, will still continue to have it.
The federal law made assault rifles legal, yet state and local counties are able to ban assault weapons. Laws to ban assault rifles should be enforced to protect civilians such as the Sandy Hook shooting. This law needs better enforcement so high powered firearms are not in the hands of irresponsible criminals. Any weapon, especially assault rifles that are capable of shooting one hundred rounds of ammunition with one magazine should be banned. Events in which assault weapons were used resulted in 135% more people shot and 57% more killed than incidents when a handgun or long gun is being used (For Lives and Liberty.)
Recently, there has been a lot of controversy around the ArmaLite rifle (AR 15), a modern sporting rifle that is legal to own in all 50 states (NSSF Sport Foundation). The public policy question raised is whether the AR 15 should be banned from citizens. Yack stated that “Discussions of the advantages and disadvantages of alternative actions natural leads to assertions of standards of mutual obligation.” By analyzing the telos and virtues associated with the AR 15, I hope to be able to clearly identify what is at stake and be able to understand right from wrong.
The reason rifles are need to defend against a tyrannical government is because the military uses rifles and body armor so pistols aren’t as effective against them and if the people are out gunned and skilled by the military they will lose in the effort to defend their freedom. One of the biggest issues with people demanding gun control on assault rifles is that they are misinformed. The definition of assault rifle is “any of various intermediate-range, magazine-fed military rifles (such as the AK-47) that can be set for automatic or semiautomatic fire” according to merriam-webster. The current gun control laws are already heavily restrictive on assault rifles. The current law requires the person to send in photos of themselves, send in fingerprints, fill out an application, interview with ATF, interview
Yes is really needed to have a new assault weapons ban because that kind of guns are creating to much destruction, this kind of guns are too powerful for the public use, so is needed to regulate them. Also it will bring many advantages like a better control on the use of these guns, a more accurate regulation on the people who sell and purchase all these guns, make the communities feel safe on the places the live and it is really important, give better ways to the law for fight crime, it help them to protect people more easily, and finally and really important it will give to the government a better appearance in front of its country so, is needed to create a new assault weapons ban as soon as
Since 1982, regulations on an individual’s right to arms have been negotiated. 55 percent of Americans see direct correlation between guns and crimes,but they don’t see the other side of the story. Guns is not what causes these crimes. Because of the real meaning behind the second amendment, the real reason behind mass shootings, and the
‘In the late 1980s, gun control groups realized that they had failed in their original goal—getting handguns banned—and began campaigning against semi-automatic firearms they called "assault weapons," most of which are rifles’(“A ban on assault weapons would not reduce crime”). From 1994 to 2004, the Federal Assault Weapons (F.D.A) banned semi automatic weapons from having more than 10 rounds. The easiest way to define gun control is by saying it a government regulation sale of any type of handgun, or assault rifle. It’s just a certain style the government sales firearms, if you have a criminal background or criminal history you are not allowed to purchase a firearm due to gun control. I personally think gun control doesn’t cause any harm to today’s society, considering the fact that i’m constantly around guns and I have no violent urge to put anyone in danger.
Gun Control: Assault Weapons Should be Banned in America In the past decade there have been many mass shootings which sparked a nationwide debate on the ban on assault weapons. Assault weapons are Semiautomatic weapons that are usually used in the military due to their advanced features. The difference between a Semiautomatic weapon and a regular pistol is that semiautomatic guns reload automatically and can fire consistently (Assault Weapons). Majority of Americans argue that Assault Weapons should be banned nationwide because of the amount of mass shootings caused by Assault weapons.
Even Senator of California Dianne Feinstein, one of the many senators who wanted a ban on assault weapons said that “The 1994 Assault Weapons Ban was effective at reducing crime and getting these military-style weapons off our streets,” (Assault Weapons). If the government once banned assault weapons and only good effects came, the government should do the ban
But what should be done about assault weapons? There should be no reason for homeowners and everyday citizens to own such things as an AR-15 or a Machine Gun. Assault weapons should not be permitted in the US. The majority of assault weapons that are used for these shootings are acquired legally by shooters. In some of the most recent major attacks, “killers in Las Vegas and Orlando attacks… walk into gun shops and legally purchase assault weapons” (Ingraham).
The Gun Control Debate In recent years, there’s not many topics on the political spectrum that aren’t absolutely polarizing. This essay will attempt to show each side’s generalized opinions, and find flaws in each of their arguments, as every ethical argument has flaws. Analyzing each side will help anyone understand their own opinions better, because without the demonization of the opposite party, ethics get much more difficult. Gun control is everywhere in the news right now, as three months into the year, the country has had12 school shootings in 2018. Exploring the ethics of gun control can get messy and emotional, but it’s important to understand all sides of a subject.
And for anyone who could possibly oppose that we put stricter laws on getting guns is simply blind to the sad and awful reality that children cant even attend school without the fear of someone coming in that school and do something as terrible as open fire on innocent students. The frightening truth is that on average science 2013 there is approximately 1 school shooting every week that sums up to about 300 shootings and that 's
Pistols aren’t the only problem but automatic weapons are legal in only a few places and the United States is one of them. It is illegal to hunt with automatic weapons, they are only used for home defense and recreation. Is it worth keeping automatic weapons and semi-automatic weapons for home defense and recreation when tens of thousands of people die each year from gun violence? Banning pistols could have the same effect as it did in Australia and reduce the crime rates and