ipl-logo

The Role Of Antonio Lopez De Santa Anna In Mexico

501 Words3 Pages

Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna had many leadership qualities he was literally a leader, he served as a Mexican politician and general. He significantly influenced early Mexican politics and government, he was a skilled soldier and clever politician. He gained power in Mexico, throwing out the Mexican constitution and declaring himself dictator. Santa Anna did not have a specific ideology. The federalists gave him the opportunity to come back to the country, to take power, and to defend Mexico. Since Santa Anna was not really committed to either side of politics, his alliance with the federalists was just so he would be allowed to return to power. It was possible for Santa Anna to change his political views from one group to the other as long as the group could guarantee that he would be in power because that is all that he wanted.
Santa Anna repealed the Mexican Constitution, which eventually led to the beginning of the Texas Revolution. Santa Anna 's reasoning for the repeal was that American settlers in Texas were not paying taxes or tariffs, the Texans were claiming they were not recipients of any of the services provided by the Mexican Government. As a result, the new settlers were not allowed there. The new policy was a response to the U.S. attempts to purchase Texas from Mexico. Santa Anna’s …show more content…

Texas was part of Mexico, with the land being cheap Americans wanted to settle there and when Americans tried claiming it as their own he had to fight back just like anyone would. Americans were trying to take over and they disagreed with his laws therefore he was standing his ground. Later Santa Anna described in a letter that killing defenders of the Alamo was his only option. The letter blamed William Travis on the amount of violence that occurred. He stated that if Travis had not have been so disrespectful towards him that he would have allowed Sam Houston to establish a dominant presence

Show More
Related

  • Mexican Law Of April 6, 1830

    466 Words  | 2 Pages

    The very rapid growth of the colonies made the Mexican leaders very nervous and insecure. Their attempt to protect the territory by stopping immigration into Texas caused a rebellion. This continuous conflict led to revolution and independence. The Law of April 6, 1830, expressed the Mexican policy of stopping the further colonization of Texas by American settlers. The law proposed to make the empresario contracts that had not been finished yet void and prohibited settlement of immigrants in territory next to their native countries.

    Read More

  • Who Is The Defense Of The Mexican Army In The Film The Alamo

    434 Words  | 2 Pages

    In The (2004) movie The Alamo we see the battle that led up to the defeat of Texan soldiers in their defense of the Alamo from the Mexican Army led by the Dictator Santa Anna. This film was in some ways very accurate but in other ways had great inaccuracies On February 23, 1836, The Mexican army arrived outside the Alamo and waged a siege on the Spanish mission. The Alamo was defended by a mixed group of Texians and Tejanos who fought and defended the Alamo against a force vastly larger than their own for 13 days viewing it as the key to the defense of Texas. The defenders of the Alamo were led by William B. Travis and was joined by many famous individuals of the time such as Jim Bowie, and David Crockett.

    Read More

  • How Did Houston A Lack Of Shared Understanding

    731 Words  | 3 Pages

    As previously mentioned, the Texians committed a slaughter with abandon. General Houston that capturing Mexican leadership, especially General Santa Anna was key to victory. If they killed him or he escaped then the other Mexican forces would then destroy the Texian force in a counterattack. General Houston’s outburst at seeing what he thought was a Mexican column is an indicator of his understanding. No one else in the Texian army understood this.

    Read More

  • History Of The Treaty Of Guadalupe Hidalgo

    315 Words  | 2 Pages

    By September 1847, American troops had captured Mexico City after winning a series of hotly contested battles. The Mexicans still refused to surrender. With the American army went a special envoy, Nicholas Trist, who unauthorized to deliver Polk’s terms of peace. Therefore, in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which signed on February 2, 1848, Mexico ceded its northern provinces of California, New Mexico (included today’s Arizona, Utah, Nevada and part of Colorado) and accepted the Rio Grande as the boundary of Texas. The United States was to pay Mexico $15 million and assume up to $3 million in Mexican debts to American citizens.

    Read More

  • Alamo In Blood And Memory

    1345 Words  | 6 Pages

    The authors do an excellent job showing that while the Texans were outnumbered and everything was going against them they still fought because they feared they would be ruled with a dictator and would not have freedom like they already had. They felt like this because the Santa Anna led Mexican army fought by force, the soldiers were forced to fight. That is the definition of tyranny and the Texans wanted no part of that, William Travis even expressed their mindset in a letter saying, “VICTORY or DEATH.’’ (127). What the reader sees later is that the battle of the Alamo was not just a loss to the Mexican Army, it was really a wakeup call for everyone to realize that Santa Anna was ruthless and should be accounted for.

    Read More

  • How Did The Americans Fight In Mexico

    469 Words  | 2 Pages

    He began gathering colonists, but died before he could begin the colony. His son, Stephen Austin resumed his father’s work. The three simple stipulations we had for colonizing were ; they were to bring no slaves (slavery is illegal) ; the settlers must swear oaths of loyalty to the Mexican Government ; they must become Roman Catholic. The little rebels decided to ignore these conditions and we, the reasonable people of Mexico decided to give them one more chance, follow the laws, or the land grant is taken away. They still didn’t want to listen, so we banned immigration to Texas, made the Americans pay property taxes, and raised tariffs on imported American goods, and they still wouldn’t obey the laws!

    Read More

  • Long Term Effects Of The Texas Revolution

    1536 Words  | 7 Pages

    It is irrefutable that the Texas Revolution had long term effects that changed American foreign and domestic policy. The actions of one man however, was the cause of the prelude to what will become a pivotal moment in U.S. history. Samuel “Sam” Houston from Tennessee was a military leader and politician who served in the American military and the U.S. House of Representatives before moving to Texas. Although not present during the founding of the Texan colonies, Sam Houston took a stand for Texas through his military leadership, securing independence from Mexico, and setting the stage for annexation by the United States of America. Before the arrival of Sam Houston, Stephen Austin, an American, set out to colonize land owned by the Spanish

    Read More

  • Essay On Texas Revolution

    624 Words  | 3 Pages

    He also removed some customs duties, but increased them in January of 1835. So while he did employ some of the changes that Texans wanted, he failed to cease the growing dissent Texas had for Mexico. One of the slightly more minor reasons the Texas Revolution happened was because of Mexico’s policy on immigration. The Law of April 6, 1830 made it illegal for anyone from the United States to immigrate to Texas. As you could imagine, this angered the already existing American immigrants, because that meant that they could not bring relatives along so that they could move to Texas as well.

    Read More

  • Hernan Cortes Contributions To The Renaissance

    201 Words  | 1 Pages

    Hernan Cortes significantly contributed to the Renaissance by giving Spain money/ spreading Spanish culture and power, and encouraging exploration. Cortes earned Spain money by conquering Central and South America. It was cruel and horrible for the people living in the area, but it gave artisans (craftsperson), merchants, and artists who supplied Spain with goods. Another achievement Cortes is credited with is, spreading the rule of Spain; he conquered the Aztecs (if he hadn’t they may still be in our society and our history would be completely different.), Cortes also built New Mexico in the New World. He also took riches from Natives in South and North America.

    Read More

  • Mexican American War Essay Thesis

    1171 Words  | 5 Pages

    INTRODUCTION Throughout the 1840s and 1850s a major war happened called the Mexican American War which drastically changed the U.S. and Mexico and lead to the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo to be signed and which established the Rio Grande and not the Nueces River as the U.S Border. This also lead to the U.S. annexation of Texas and lead to the Mexico agreeing to sell California and the rest of the territory for 15 million. So you 're probably wondering why the war was fought but you 'll find that out later.

    Read More

  • Mexican American War Justified Dbq Essay

    492 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Document B, President Polk said, “I had ordered and efficient military force to take a position...to meet a threatened invasion of Texas by the Mexican forces….invasion was threatened solely because Texas had determined….to annex herself to our Union,... it was plainly our duty to extend our protection over her citizens and soil.” President Polk then mentioned the attack at the Rio del Norte, where the invasion in Texas happened. This evidence shows the US was justified in going to war with Mexico because Texas was invaded by Mexico, meaning that the U.S. should protect Texas by fighting

    Read More

  • Essay On Was The Us Justified In Going To War With Mexico

    465 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thirdly, a second reason the Mexican War was not justified because US soldiers were in a disputed area. According to Jesus Velasco Marquez from “A Mexican Viewpoint on the War With the United States,” he states that “From Mexico’s point of view, the annexation of Texas to the United States was inadmissible for both legal and security reasons.” As well as, “The American government acted like a bandit who came upon a

    Read More

  • Battle Of San Jacinto Battle Analysis

    969 Words  | 4 Pages

    “In exchange for his freedom, Santa Anna signed a treaty recognizing Texas’ independence” (Battle of San Jacinto, 2015). General Houston and his army were heavly inspired for victory following the massacres at the Alamo and Goliad. Santa Anna lost the Battle of San Jacinto due his previous viciousness, arrogance, and misuse of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) assets effectively. Had Santa Anna not made these mistakes, the Battle of San Jacinto would have turned out differently and Texas may have not won its independence from Mexico (Wright, n.d.). Introduction

    Read More

  • Was The Mexican War Justified Essay

    568 Words  | 3 Pages

    The United states was longing to annex,or take land into a country, California. One reason the Mexican War was justified

    Read More

  • Was The Mexican-American War Justified?

    1199 Words  | 5 Pages

    Jesús Velasco-Márquez, a modern-day Mexican professor of studies wrote an article in 2006 about the Mexican-American War. He said, “US historians refer to this event as ‘The Mexican-American War’, while in Mexico, we prefer to use the term ‘The U.S. Invasion... From Mexico’s point of view, the annexation of Texas to the United States was inadmissible for both legal and security reasons. ’’’ (Velasco-Márquez, 12). During the time of the independence of Texas, Mexico was ruled by the dictator General Antonio López de Santa Anna.

    Read More

More about The Role Of Antonio Lopez De Santa Anna In Mexico

Open Document