What Was Brutus's Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

474 Words2 Pages

In 1599, William Shakespeare wrote a play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar . The play was first performed on September 21, 1599. It consists of three main characters; Julius Caesar, Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony. In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar , Brutus delivers a more persuasive funeral speech due to his extraordinary use of ethos, pathos and logos. In Act III Scene 2 of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus uses the concept of ethos. He states “ … hear me for my cause, and be silent, that you may hear: believe me for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour, that you may believe; censure me in your wisdom, and awaken your senses, that you may the better judge. ”. Brutus ensures the crowd that …show more content…

Marcus Brutus makes a better ethos statement. For pathos, Brutus appeals to emotions better. He states “ Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman? ”. Brutus uses emotion to lure the people. He claims that he did love Caesar but his love for his country was stronger. He makes the people feel patriotic. For Antony, he also states, “ You are not wood, you are not stones, but men; And being men, bearing the will of Caesar… ”. Antony claims Brutus was not ambitious. His purpose was to turn the people against Brutus, but his use of pathos was poor. He did not fully cover why Brutus was wrong in killing Caesar to defend his country. Brutus was stronger in using pathos. For logos, Brutus has a strong claim. He claims “ … but, as he was ambitious, I slew him. ”. Brutus uses facts about Roman history to prove that the assassination of Julius Caesar was done for the better of the country. He has a strong point with his use of logos. On the other hand, Antony states, “ If it were so, it was a grievous fault, and grievously hath Caesar answer’d it. ”. Antony has a weak point in which he attempted to prove that Brutus himself was ambitious. For in the end, the people chose Brutus’s

Open Document